Industrial interference and radio astronomy

The interferer – victim scenario is described for the case of industrial interference affecting radio astronomical observatories. The sensitivity of radio astronomical receivers and their interference limits are outlined. EMC above 30 MHz is a serious problem for Radio Astronomy. Interferer (CISPR)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. Jessner
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-07-01
Series:Advances in Radio Science
Online Access:http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/11/251/2013/ars-11-251-2013.pdf
id doaj-6a058363261d403f8704d6fcad480f82
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a058363261d403f8704d6fcad480f822020-11-24T22:39:47ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsAdvances in Radio Science 1684-99651684-99732013-07-011125125810.5194/ars-11-251-2013Industrial interference and radio astronomyA. Jessner0Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Auf dem Huegel 69, 53121 Bonn, GermanyThe interferer – victim scenario is described for the case of industrial interference affecting radio astronomical observatories. The sensitivity of radio astronomical receivers and their interference limits are outlined. EMC above 30 MHz is a serious problem for Radio Astronomy. Interferer (CISPR) and victim (ITU-R RA 769) standards are not harmonised. The emissions from the interferer and their spectral characteristics are not defined sufficiently well by CISPR standards. The required minimum coupling losses (MCL) between an industrial device and radio astronomical antenna depends on device properties but is shown to exceed 140 dB in most cases. Spatial separation of a few km is insufficient on its own, the terrain must shield > 30–40 dB, additional mitigations such as extra shielding or suppression of high frequency emissions may be necessary. A case by case compatibility analysis and tailored EMC measures are required for individual installations. Aggregation of many weak rfi emitters can become serious problem. If deployment densities are high enough, the emission constraints can even exceed those for a single interferer at a short distance from the radio observatory. Compatibility studies must account not only for the single interferer but also for many widely distributed interference sources.http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/11/251/2013/ars-11-251-2013.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Jessner
spellingShingle A. Jessner
Industrial interference and radio astronomy
Advances in Radio Science
author_facet A. Jessner
author_sort A. Jessner
title Industrial interference and radio astronomy
title_short Industrial interference and radio astronomy
title_full Industrial interference and radio astronomy
title_fullStr Industrial interference and radio astronomy
title_full_unstemmed Industrial interference and radio astronomy
title_sort industrial interference and radio astronomy
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Advances in Radio Science
issn 1684-9965
1684-9973
publishDate 2013-07-01
description The interferer – victim scenario is described for the case of industrial interference affecting radio astronomical observatories. The sensitivity of radio astronomical receivers and their interference limits are outlined. EMC above 30 MHz is a serious problem for Radio Astronomy. Interferer (CISPR) and victim (ITU-R RA 769) standards are not harmonised. The emissions from the interferer and their spectral characteristics are not defined sufficiently well by CISPR standards. The required minimum coupling losses (MCL) between an industrial device and radio astronomical antenna depends on device properties but is shown to exceed 140 dB in most cases. Spatial separation of a few km is insufficient on its own, the terrain must shield > 30–40 dB, additional mitigations such as extra shielding or suppression of high frequency emissions may be necessary. A case by case compatibility analysis and tailored EMC measures are required for individual installations. Aggregation of many weak rfi emitters can become serious problem. If deployment densities are high enough, the emission constraints can even exceed those for a single interferer at a short distance from the radio observatory. Compatibility studies must account not only for the single interferer but also for many widely distributed interference sources.
url http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/11/251/2013/ars-11-251-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ajessner industrialinterferenceandradioastronomy
_version_ 1725707644876881920