Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems Analysis

With an increasing share of renewable energy technologies in our energy systems, the integration of not only direct emission (from the use phase), but also the total life cycle emissions (including emissions during resource extraction, production, etc.) becomes more important in order to draw meanin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Betten, Shivenes Shammugam, Roberta Graf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4437
id doaj-69f7d013c1514e2f8ffc43808515d359
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69f7d013c1514e2f8ffc43808515d3592020-11-25T03:50:09ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-08-01134437443710.3390/en13174437Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems AnalysisThomas Betten0Shivenes Shammugam1Roberta Graf2Institute for Acoustics and Building Physics, University of Stuttgart, 70563 Stuttgart, GermanyFraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (ISE), 79110 Freiburg, GermanyFraunhofer Institute for Building Physics (IBP), 70563 Stuttgart, GermanyWith an increasing share of renewable energy technologies in our energy systems, the integration of not only direct emission (from the use phase), but also the total life cycle emissions (including emissions during resource extraction, production, etc.) becomes more important in order to draw meaningful conclusions from Energy Systems Analysis (ESA). While the benefit of integrating Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) into ESA is acknowledged, methodologically sound integration lacks resonance in practice, partly because the dimension of the implications is not yet fully understood. This study proposes an easy-to-implement procedure for the integration of LCA results in ESA based on existing theoretical approaches. The need for a methodologically sound integration, including the avoidance of double counting of emissions, is demonstrated on the use case of Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell photovoltaic technology. The difference in Global Warming Potential of 19% between direct and LCA based emissions shows the significance for the integration of the total emissions into energy systems analysis and the potential double counting of 75% of the life cycle emissions for the use case supports the need for avoidance of double counting.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4437life cycle assessmentenergy system analysisenergy system modellingdecarbonisationdouble countingdirect emissions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Betten
Shivenes Shammugam
Roberta Graf
spellingShingle Thomas Betten
Shivenes Shammugam
Roberta Graf
Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems Analysis
Energies
life cycle assessment
energy system analysis
energy system modelling
decarbonisation
double counting
direct emissions
author_facet Thomas Betten
Shivenes Shammugam
Roberta Graf
author_sort Thomas Betten
title Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems Analysis
title_short Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems Analysis
title_full Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems Analysis
title_fullStr Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems Analysis
title_sort adjustment of the life cycle inventory in life cycle assessment for the flexible integration into energy systems analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-08-01
description With an increasing share of renewable energy technologies in our energy systems, the integration of not only direct emission (from the use phase), but also the total life cycle emissions (including emissions during resource extraction, production, etc.) becomes more important in order to draw meaningful conclusions from Energy Systems Analysis (ESA). While the benefit of integrating Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) into ESA is acknowledged, methodologically sound integration lacks resonance in practice, partly because the dimension of the implications is not yet fully understood. This study proposes an easy-to-implement procedure for the integration of LCA results in ESA based on existing theoretical approaches. The need for a methodologically sound integration, including the avoidance of double counting of emissions, is demonstrated on the use case of Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell photovoltaic technology. The difference in Global Warming Potential of 19% between direct and LCA based emissions shows the significance for the integration of the total emissions into energy systems analysis and the potential double counting of 75% of the life cycle emissions for the use case supports the need for avoidance of double counting.
topic life cycle assessment
energy system analysis
energy system modelling
decarbonisation
double counting
direct emissions
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4437
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasbetten adjustmentofthelifecycleinventoryinlifecycleassessmentfortheflexibleintegrationintoenergysystemsanalysis
AT shivenesshammugam adjustmentofthelifecycleinventoryinlifecycleassessmentfortheflexibleintegrationintoenergysystemsanalysis
AT robertagraf adjustmentofthelifecycleinventoryinlifecycleassessmentfortheflexibleintegrationintoenergysystemsanalysis
_version_ 1724491954254774272