The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men
Background: This report details the development of the Men’s Safer Sex website and the results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), health economic assessment and qualitative evaluation. Objectives: (1) Develop the Men’s Safer Sex website to address barriers to condom use; (2) determi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
NIHR Journals Library
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Health Technology Assessment |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20910 |
id |
doaj-69ed2b869f5c4bdf8e3da3ceb7ed0b75 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Julia V Bailey Rosie Webster Rachael Hunter Mark Griffin Nicholas Freemantle Greta Rait Claudia Estcourt Susan Michie Jane Anderson Judith Stephenson Makeda Gerressu Chee Siang Ang Elizabeth Murray |
spellingShingle |
Julia V Bailey Rosie Webster Rachael Hunter Mark Griffin Nicholas Freemantle Greta Rait Claudia Estcourt Susan Michie Jane Anderson Judith Stephenson Makeda Gerressu Chee Siang Ang Elizabeth Murray The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men Health Technology Assessment |
author_facet |
Julia V Bailey Rosie Webster Rachael Hunter Mark Griffin Nicholas Freemantle Greta Rait Claudia Estcourt Susan Michie Jane Anderson Judith Stephenson Makeda Gerressu Chee Siang Ang Elizabeth Murray |
author_sort |
Julia V Bailey |
title |
The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men |
title_short |
The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men |
title_full |
The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men |
title_fullStr |
The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men |
title_sort |
men’s safer sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men |
publisher |
NIHR Journals Library |
series |
Health Technology Assessment |
issn |
1366-5278 2046-4924 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Background: This report details the development of the Men’s Safer Sex website and the results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), health economic assessment and qualitative evaluation. Objectives: (1) Develop the Men’s Safer Sex website to address barriers to condom use; (2) determine the best design for an online RCT; (3) inform the methods for collecting and analysing health economic data; (4) assess the Sexual Quality of Life (SQoL) questionnaire and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, three-level version (EQ-5D-3L) to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); and (5) explore clinic staff and men’s views of online research methodology. Methods: (1) Website development: we combined evidence from research literature and the views of experts (n = 18) and male clinic users (n = 43); (2) feasibility RCT: 159 heterosexually active men were recruited from three sexual health clinics and were randomised by computer to the Men’s Safer Sex website plus usual care (n = 84) or usual clinic care only (n = 75). Men were invited to complete online questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnoses were recorded from clinic notes at 12 months; (3) health economic evaluation: we investigated the impact of using different questionnaires to calculate utilities and QALYs (the EQ-5D-3L and SQoL questionnaire), and compared different methods to collect resource use; and (4) qualitative evaluation: thematic analysis of interviews with 11 male trial participants and nine clinic staff, as well as free-text comments from online outcome questionnaires. Results: (1) Software errors and clinic Wi-Fi access presented significant challenges. Response rates for online questionnaires were poor but improved with larger vouchers (from 36% with £10 to 50% with £30). Clinical records were located for 94% of participants for STI diagnoses. There were no group differences in condomless sex with female partners [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52 to 1.96]. New STI diagnoses were recorded for 8.8% (7/80) of the intervention group and 13.0% (9/69) of the control group (IRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.89). (2) Health-care resource data were more complete using patient files than questionnaires. The probability that the intervention is cost-effective is sensitive to the source of data used and whether or not data on intended pregnancies are included. (3) The pilot RCT fitted well around clinical activities but 37% of the intervention group did not see the Men’s Safer Sex website and technical problems were frustrating. Men’s views of the Men’s Safer Sex website and research procedures were largely positive. Conclusions: It would be feasible to conduct a large-scale RCT using clinic STI diagnoses as a primary outcome; however, technical errors and a poor response rate limited the collection of online self-reported outcomes. The next steps are (1) to optimise software for online trials, (2) to find the best ways to integrate digital health promotion with clinical services, (3) to develop more precise methods for collecting resource use data and (4) to work out how to overcome barriers to digital intervention testing and implementation in the NHS. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18649610. Funding: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 91. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20910 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juliavbailey themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT rosiewebster themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT rachaelhunter themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT markgriffin themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT nicholasfreemantle themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT gretarait themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT claudiaestcourt themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT susanmichie themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT janeanderson themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT judithstephenson themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT makedagerressu themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT cheesiangang themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT elizabethmurray themenssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT juliavbailey menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT rosiewebster menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT rachaelhunter menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT markgriffin menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT nicholasfreemantle menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT gretarait menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT claudiaestcourt menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT susanmichie menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT janeanderson menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT judithstephenson menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT makedagerressu menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT cheesiangang menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen AT elizabethmurray menssafersexprojectinterventiondevelopmentandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen |
_version_ |
1725271984325001216 |
spelling |
doaj-69ed2b869f5c4bdf8e3da3ceb7ed0b752020-11-25T00:45:00ZengNIHR Journals LibraryHealth Technology Assessment1366-52782046-49242016-12-01209110.3310/hta2091010/131/01The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in menJulia V Bailey0Rosie Webster1Rachael Hunter2Mark Griffin3Nicholas Freemantle4Greta Rait5Claudia Estcourt6Susan Michie7Jane Anderson8Judith Stephenson9Makeda Gerressu10Chee Siang Ang11Elizabeth Murray12E-Health unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UKE-Health unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UKPRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UKPRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UKPRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UKPRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UKBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Barts Sexual Health Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UKResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UKHomerton Sexual Health Services, Homerton Teaching Hospitals, London, UKDepartment of Reproductive Health, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UKDepartment of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UKEngineering and Digital Arts, University of Kent, Kent, UKE-Health unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UKBackground: This report details the development of the Men’s Safer Sex website and the results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), health economic assessment and qualitative evaluation. Objectives: (1) Develop the Men’s Safer Sex website to address barriers to condom use; (2) determine the best design for an online RCT; (3) inform the methods for collecting and analysing health economic data; (4) assess the Sexual Quality of Life (SQoL) questionnaire and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, three-level version (EQ-5D-3L) to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); and (5) explore clinic staff and men’s views of online research methodology. Methods: (1) Website development: we combined evidence from research literature and the views of experts (n = 18) and male clinic users (n = 43); (2) feasibility RCT: 159 heterosexually active men were recruited from three sexual health clinics and were randomised by computer to the Men’s Safer Sex website plus usual care (n = 84) or usual clinic care only (n = 75). Men were invited to complete online questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnoses were recorded from clinic notes at 12 months; (3) health economic evaluation: we investigated the impact of using different questionnaires to calculate utilities and QALYs (the EQ-5D-3L and SQoL questionnaire), and compared different methods to collect resource use; and (4) qualitative evaluation: thematic analysis of interviews with 11 male trial participants and nine clinic staff, as well as free-text comments from online outcome questionnaires. Results: (1) Software errors and clinic Wi-Fi access presented significant challenges. Response rates for online questionnaires were poor but improved with larger vouchers (from 36% with £10 to 50% with £30). Clinical records were located for 94% of participants for STI diagnoses. There were no group differences in condomless sex with female partners [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52 to 1.96]. New STI diagnoses were recorded for 8.8% (7/80) of the intervention group and 13.0% (9/69) of the control group (IRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.89). (2) Health-care resource data were more complete using patient files than questionnaires. The probability that the intervention is cost-effective is sensitive to the source of data used and whether or not data on intended pregnancies are included. (3) The pilot RCT fitted well around clinical activities but 37% of the intervention group did not see the Men’s Safer Sex website and technical problems were frustrating. Men’s views of the Men’s Safer Sex website and research procedures were largely positive. Conclusions: It would be feasible to conduct a large-scale RCT using clinic STI diagnoses as a primary outcome; however, technical errors and a poor response rate limited the collection of online self-reported outcomes. The next steps are (1) to optimise software for online trials, (2) to find the best ways to integrate digital health promotion with clinical services, (3) to develop more precise methods for collecting resource use data and (4) to work out how to overcome barriers to digital intervention testing and implementation in the NHS. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18649610. Funding: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 91. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20910 |