Classification of Stereo-EEG Contacts in White Matter vs. Gray Matter Using Recorded Activity

For epileptic patients requiring resective surgery, a modality called stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) may be used to monitor the patient's brain signals to help identify epileptogenic regions that generate and propagate seizures. SEEG involves the insertion of multiple depth electrodes int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Greene, Adam Li, Jorge González-Martínez, Sridevi V. Sarma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.605696/full
id doaj-69e6be9394b34d04906ec425a91af5b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69e6be9394b34d04906ec425a91af5b22021-01-06T05:33:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-01-011110.3389/fneur.2020.605696605696Classification of Stereo-EEG Contacts in White Matter vs. Gray Matter Using Recorded ActivityPatrick Greene0Adam Li1Jorge González-Martínez2Sridevi V. Sarma3Neuromedical Control Systems Lab, Institute for Computational Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United StatesNeuromedical Control Systems Lab, Institute for Computational Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United StatesNeurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United StatesNeuromedical Control Systems Lab, Institute for Computational Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United StatesFor epileptic patients requiring resective surgery, a modality called stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) may be used to monitor the patient's brain signals to help identify epileptogenic regions that generate and propagate seizures. SEEG involves the insertion of multiple depth electrodes into the patient's brain, each with 10 or more recording contacts along its length. However, a significant fraction (≈ 30% or more) of the contacts typically reside in white matter or other areas of the brain which can not be epileptogenic themselves. Thus, an important step in the analysis of SEEG recordings is distinguishing between electrode contacts which reside in gray matter vs. those that do not. MRI images overlaid with CT scans are currently used for this task, but they take significant amounts of time to manually annotate, and even then it may be difficult to determine the status of some contacts. In this paper we present a fast, automated method for classifying contacts in gray vs. white matter based only on the recorded signal and relative contact depth. We observe that bipolar referenced contacts in white matter have less power in all frequencies below 150 Hz than contacts in gray matter, which we use in a Bayesian classifier to attain an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 ± 0.079 (SD) across 29 patients. Because our method gives a probability for each contact rather than a hard labeling, and uses a feature of the recorded signal that has direct clinical relevance, it can be useful to supplement decision-making on difficult to classify contacts or as a rapid, first-pass filter when choosing subsets of contacts from which to save recordings.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.605696/fullstereo-electroencephalographySEEGwhite matterclassificationpower spectrumbipolar reference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrick Greene
Adam Li
Jorge González-Martínez
Sridevi V. Sarma
spellingShingle Patrick Greene
Adam Li
Jorge González-Martínez
Sridevi V. Sarma
Classification of Stereo-EEG Contacts in White Matter vs. Gray Matter Using Recorded Activity
Frontiers in Neurology
stereo-electroencephalography
SEEG
white matter
classification
power spectrum
bipolar reference
author_facet Patrick Greene
Adam Li
Jorge González-Martínez
Sridevi V. Sarma
author_sort Patrick Greene
title Classification of Stereo-EEG Contacts in White Matter vs. Gray Matter Using Recorded Activity
title_short Classification of Stereo-EEG Contacts in White Matter vs. Gray Matter Using Recorded Activity
title_full Classification of Stereo-EEG Contacts in White Matter vs. Gray Matter Using Recorded Activity
title_fullStr Classification of Stereo-EEG Contacts in White Matter vs. Gray Matter Using Recorded Activity
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Stereo-EEG Contacts in White Matter vs. Gray Matter Using Recorded Activity
title_sort classification of stereo-eeg contacts in white matter vs. gray matter using recorded activity
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2021-01-01
description For epileptic patients requiring resective surgery, a modality called stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) may be used to monitor the patient's brain signals to help identify epileptogenic regions that generate and propagate seizures. SEEG involves the insertion of multiple depth electrodes into the patient's brain, each with 10 or more recording contacts along its length. However, a significant fraction (≈ 30% or more) of the contacts typically reside in white matter or other areas of the brain which can not be epileptogenic themselves. Thus, an important step in the analysis of SEEG recordings is distinguishing between electrode contacts which reside in gray matter vs. those that do not. MRI images overlaid with CT scans are currently used for this task, but they take significant amounts of time to manually annotate, and even then it may be difficult to determine the status of some contacts. In this paper we present a fast, automated method for classifying contacts in gray vs. white matter based only on the recorded signal and relative contact depth. We observe that bipolar referenced contacts in white matter have less power in all frequencies below 150 Hz than contacts in gray matter, which we use in a Bayesian classifier to attain an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 ± 0.079 (SD) across 29 patients. Because our method gives a probability for each contact rather than a hard labeling, and uses a feature of the recorded signal that has direct clinical relevance, it can be useful to supplement decision-making on difficult to classify contacts or as a rapid, first-pass filter when choosing subsets of contacts from which to save recordings.
topic stereo-electroencephalography
SEEG
white matter
classification
power spectrum
bipolar reference
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.605696/full
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickgreene classificationofstereoeegcontactsinwhitemattervsgraymatterusingrecordedactivity
AT adamli classificationofstereoeegcontactsinwhitemattervsgraymatterusingrecordedactivity
AT jorgegonzalezmartinez classificationofstereoeegcontactsinwhitemattervsgraymatterusingrecordedactivity
AT sridevivsarma classificationofstereoeegcontactsinwhitemattervsgraymatterusingrecordedactivity
_version_ 1724347622439780352