Allowing repeat winners
Unbiased lotteries seem the least unfair and simplest procedures to allocate scarce indivisible resources to those with equal claims. But, when lotteries are repeated, it is not immediately obvious whether prior winners should be included or excluded. As in design questions surrounding single-shot l...
Main Authors: | Marco D. Huesch, Richard Brady |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2010-08-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/10/9311/jdm9311.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Patterns in manually
selected numbers in the Israeli lottery
by: Brian A. Polin, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
The
representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field
experiment
by: Michał Wiktor Krawczyk, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
WTP and WTA in competitive and non-competitive environments
by: Shosh Shahrabani, et al.
Published: (2008-02-01) -
Predictably
intransitive preferences
by: David J. Butler, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Veil-of-ignorance
reasoning mitigates self-serving bias in resource allocation during the
COVID-19 crisis
by: Karen Huang, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)