Race, color, and income inequality across the Americas

<b>Background</b>: Racial inequality in the U.S. is typically described in terms of stark categorical difference, as compared to the more gradational stratification based on skin color often said to prevail in parts of Latin America. However, nationally representative data with both type...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stanley Bailey, Aliya Saperstein, Andrew Penner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2014-09-01
Series:Demographic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol31/24/
id doaj-69c93367c5ae430c9234fddff10f50ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69c93367c5ae430c9234fddff10f50ed2020-11-24T22:49:00ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712014-09-01312410.4054/DemRes.2014.31.242450Race, color, and income inequality across the AmericasStanley Bailey0Aliya Saperstein1Andrew Penner2University of California, IrvineStanford UniversityUniversity of California, Irvine<b>Background</b>: Racial inequality in the U.S. is typically described in terms of stark categorical difference, as compared to the more gradational stratification based on skin color often said to prevail in parts of Latin America. However, nationally representative data with both types of measures have not been available to explicitly test this contrast. <b>Objective</b>: We use novel, recently released data from the U.S. and 18 Latin American countries to describe household income inequality across the region by perceived skin color and racial self-identification, and examine which measure better captures racial disparities in each national context. <b>Results</b>: We document color and racial hierarchies across the Americas, revealing some unexpected patterns. White advantage and indigenous disadvantage are fairly consistent features, whereas blacks at times have higher mean incomes than other racial populations. Income inequality can best be understood in some countries using racial categories alone, in others using skin color; in a few countries, including the U.S., a combination of skin color and self-identified race best explains income variation. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results complicate theoretical debates about U.S. racial exceptionalism and methodological debates about how best to measure race. Rather than supporting one measure over another, our cross-national analysis underscores race‟s multidimensionality. The variation in patterns of inequality also defies common comparisons between the U.S. on the one hand and a singular Latin America on the other.http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol31/24/racial identificationracial inequalityskin color
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stanley Bailey
Aliya Saperstein
Andrew Penner
spellingShingle Stanley Bailey
Aliya Saperstein
Andrew Penner
Race, color, and income inequality across the Americas
Demographic Research
racial identification
racial inequality
skin color
author_facet Stanley Bailey
Aliya Saperstein
Andrew Penner
author_sort Stanley Bailey
title Race, color, and income inequality across the Americas
title_short Race, color, and income inequality across the Americas
title_full Race, color, and income inequality across the Americas
title_fullStr Race, color, and income inequality across the Americas
title_full_unstemmed Race, color, and income inequality across the Americas
title_sort race, color, and income inequality across the americas
publisher Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
series Demographic Research
issn 1435-9871
publishDate 2014-09-01
description <b>Background</b>: Racial inequality in the U.S. is typically described in terms of stark categorical difference, as compared to the more gradational stratification based on skin color often said to prevail in parts of Latin America. However, nationally representative data with both types of measures have not been available to explicitly test this contrast. <b>Objective</b>: We use novel, recently released data from the U.S. and 18 Latin American countries to describe household income inequality across the region by perceived skin color and racial self-identification, and examine which measure better captures racial disparities in each national context. <b>Results</b>: We document color and racial hierarchies across the Americas, revealing some unexpected patterns. White advantage and indigenous disadvantage are fairly consistent features, whereas blacks at times have higher mean incomes than other racial populations. Income inequality can best be understood in some countries using racial categories alone, in others using skin color; in a few countries, including the U.S., a combination of skin color and self-identified race best explains income variation. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results complicate theoretical debates about U.S. racial exceptionalism and methodological debates about how best to measure race. Rather than supporting one measure over another, our cross-national analysis underscores race‟s multidimensionality. The variation in patterns of inequality also defies common comparisons between the U.S. on the one hand and a singular Latin America on the other.
topic racial identification
racial inequality
skin color
url http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol31/24/
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleybailey racecolorandincomeinequalityacrosstheamericas
AT aliyasaperstein racecolorandincomeinequalityacrosstheamericas
AT andrewpenner racecolorandincomeinequalityacrosstheamericas
_version_ 1725677642967941120