Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Joint replacement is an effective intervention for people with advanced arthritis, although there is an important minority of patients who do not improve post-operatively. There is a need for robust evidence on outcomes after surgery...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wylde Vikki, Blom Ashley W, Bolink Stijn, Brunton Luke, Dieppe Paul, Gooberman-Hill Rachael, Grimm Bernd, Mann Cindy, Lenguerrand Erik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-11-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Hip
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/220
id doaj-69bdb443e173452a9a398d8ebf5b65bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69bdb443e173452a9a398d8ebf5b65bc2020-11-24T21:06:02ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742012-11-0113122010.1186/1471-2474-13-220Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort studyWylde VikkiBlom Ashley WBolink StijnBrunton LukeDieppe PaulGooberman-Hill RachaelGrimm BerndMann CindyLenguerrand Erik<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Joint replacement is an effective intervention for people with advanced arthritis, although there is an important minority of patients who do not improve post-operatively. There is a need for robust evidence on outcomes after surgery, but there are a number of measures that assess function after joint replacement, many of which lack any clear theoretical basis. The World Health Organisation has introduced the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which divides function into three separate domains: Impairment, activity limitations and participation restrictions. The aim of this study is to compare the properties and responsiveness of a selection of commonly used outcome tools that assess function, examine how well they relate to the ICF concepts, and to explore the changes in the measures over time.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>Two hundred and sixty three patients listed for lower limb joint replacement at an elective orthopaedic centre have been recruited into this study. Participants attend the hospital for a research appointment prior to surgery and then at 3-months and 1-year after surgery. At each assessment time, function is assessed using a range of measures. Self-report function is assessed using the WOMAC, Aberdeen Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction Measure, SF-12 and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2. Clinician-administered measures of function include the American Knee Society Score for knee patients and the Harris Hip Score for hip patients. Performance tests include the timed 20-metre walk, timed get up and go, sit-to-stand-to-sit, step tests and single stance balance test. During the performance tests, participants wear an inertial sensor and data from motion analysis are collected. Statistical analysis will include exploring the relationship between measures describing the same ICF concepts, assessing responsiveness, and studying changes in measures over time.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>There are a range of tools that can be used to assess function before and after joint replacement, with little information about how these various measures compare in their properties and responsiveness. This study aims to provide this data on a selection of commonly used assessments of function, and explore how they relate to the ICF domains.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/220Joint replacementHipKneeDisabilityPainFunctionOutcomeSelf-reportPerformance testsMotion analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wylde Vikki
Blom Ashley W
Bolink Stijn
Brunton Luke
Dieppe Paul
Gooberman-Hill Rachael
Grimm Bernd
Mann Cindy
Lenguerrand Erik
spellingShingle Wylde Vikki
Blom Ashley W
Bolink Stijn
Brunton Luke
Dieppe Paul
Gooberman-Hill Rachael
Grimm Bernd
Mann Cindy
Lenguerrand Erik
Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Joint replacement
Hip
Knee
Disability
Pain
Function
Outcome
Self-report
Performance tests
Motion analysis
author_facet Wylde Vikki
Blom Ashley W
Bolink Stijn
Brunton Luke
Dieppe Paul
Gooberman-Hill Rachael
Grimm Bernd
Mann Cindy
Lenguerrand Erik
author_sort Wylde Vikki
title Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study
title_short Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study
title_full Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study
title_fullStr Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study
title_sort assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2012-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Joint replacement is an effective intervention for people with advanced arthritis, although there is an important minority of patients who do not improve post-operatively. There is a need for robust evidence on outcomes after surgery, but there are a number of measures that assess function after joint replacement, many of which lack any clear theoretical basis. The World Health Organisation has introduced the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which divides function into three separate domains: Impairment, activity limitations and participation restrictions. The aim of this study is to compare the properties and responsiveness of a selection of commonly used outcome tools that assess function, examine how well they relate to the ICF concepts, and to explore the changes in the measures over time.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>Two hundred and sixty three patients listed for lower limb joint replacement at an elective orthopaedic centre have been recruited into this study. Participants attend the hospital for a research appointment prior to surgery and then at 3-months and 1-year after surgery. At each assessment time, function is assessed using a range of measures. Self-report function is assessed using the WOMAC, Aberdeen Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction Measure, SF-12 and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2. Clinician-administered measures of function include the American Knee Society Score for knee patients and the Harris Hip Score for hip patients. Performance tests include the timed 20-metre walk, timed get up and go, sit-to-stand-to-sit, step tests and single stance balance test. During the performance tests, participants wear an inertial sensor and data from motion analysis are collected. Statistical analysis will include exploring the relationship between measures describing the same ICF concepts, assessing responsiveness, and studying changes in measures over time.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>There are a range of tools that can be used to assess function before and after joint replacement, with little information about how these various measures compare in their properties and responsiveness. This study aims to provide this data on a selection of commonly used assessments of function, and explore how they relate to the ICF domains.</p>
topic Joint replacement
Hip
Knee
Disability
Pain
Function
Outcome
Self-report
Performance tests
Motion analysis
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/220
work_keys_str_mv AT wyldevikki assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
AT blomashleyw assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
AT bolinkstijn assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
AT bruntonluke assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
AT dieppepaul assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
AT goobermanhillrachael assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
AT grimmbernd assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
AT manncindy assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
AT lenguerranderik assessingfunctioninpatientsundergoingjointreplacementastudyprotocolforacohortstudy
_version_ 1716766911058935808