Recent Trends in Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Impact of Research and Use of Cell Lines in Experimental Research and Clinical Trials

Summary: The human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) research landscape is rapidly evolving. To assess possible novel trends in hPSC usage, we analyzed experimental hPSC research published from 2014 to 2016 and compared our data with those of earlier periods. The number of papers describing experimental...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anke Guhr, Sabine Kobold, Stefanie Seltmann, Andrea E.M. Seiler Wulczyn, Andreas Kurtz, Peter Löser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-08-01
Series:Stem Cell Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213671118302753
id doaj-69ac1224d78544cba08dd680118b8217
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69ac1224d78544cba08dd680118b82172020-11-25T02:21:04ZengElsevierStem Cell Reports2213-67112018-08-01112485496Recent Trends in Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Impact of Research and Use of Cell Lines in Experimental Research and Clinical TrialsAnke Guhr0Sabine Kobold1Stefanie Seltmann2Andrea E.M. Seiler Wulczyn3Andreas Kurtz4Peter Löser5Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin 13353, GermanyRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin 13353, GermanyBerlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany; hPSCreg, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 13353, GermanyRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin 13353, GermanyBerlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany; hPSCreg, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 13353, Germany; Corresponding authorRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin 13353, Germany; Corresponding authorSummary: The human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) research landscape is rapidly evolving. To assess possible novel trends in hPSC usage, we analyzed experimental hPSC research published from 2014 to 2016 and compared our data with those of earlier periods. The number of papers describing experimental work involving hPSCs increased further with clear differences in the scientific impact of publications from different countries. Our results confirm the leading position of US-based hPSC research, although to a lesser degree than observed previously. Our data reveal that research into human induced pluripotent stem cells alone surpassed human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research by 2015 and rapidly grew after that. We also report on continuing and even slightly growing research activities in the hESC field as well as on a generally declining rate of the generation of new hESC lines. An increasing portion of new hESC lines represents disease-specific and clinical-grade cell lines. The previously noted usage of only a few early established hESC lines in the vast majority of scientific work is sustained. We also provide a comprehensive overview on clinical trials on the basis of hPSCs. We find that the vast majority of those trials are based on hESC-derived cell products that were generated from an only limited number of relatively old cell lines. : Guhr et al. show that there are marked differences in the impact of recent hPSC research from different countries. The hESC line usage patterns remained mainly unchanged. The authors provide a comprehensive overview on clinical trials involving hPSC-derived cell products and find that these trials are mainly based on hESCs. Keywords: human pluripotent stem cells, human embryonic stem cells, human induced pluripotent stem cells, research, impact, citation frequencies, hESC lines, clinical trialshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213671118302753
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anke Guhr
Sabine Kobold
Stefanie Seltmann
Andrea E.M. Seiler Wulczyn
Andreas Kurtz
Peter Löser
spellingShingle Anke Guhr
Sabine Kobold
Stefanie Seltmann
Andrea E.M. Seiler Wulczyn
Andreas Kurtz
Peter Löser
Recent Trends in Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Impact of Research and Use of Cell Lines in Experimental Research and Clinical Trials
Stem Cell Reports
author_facet Anke Guhr
Sabine Kobold
Stefanie Seltmann
Andrea E.M. Seiler Wulczyn
Andreas Kurtz
Peter Löser
author_sort Anke Guhr
title Recent Trends in Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Impact of Research and Use of Cell Lines in Experimental Research and Clinical Trials
title_short Recent Trends in Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Impact of Research and Use of Cell Lines in Experimental Research and Clinical Trials
title_full Recent Trends in Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Impact of Research and Use of Cell Lines in Experimental Research and Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Recent Trends in Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Impact of Research and Use of Cell Lines in Experimental Research and Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Recent Trends in Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Impact of Research and Use of Cell Lines in Experimental Research and Clinical Trials
title_sort recent trends in research with human pluripotent stem cells: impact of research and use of cell lines in experimental research and clinical trials
publisher Elsevier
series Stem Cell Reports
issn 2213-6711
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Summary: The human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) research landscape is rapidly evolving. To assess possible novel trends in hPSC usage, we analyzed experimental hPSC research published from 2014 to 2016 and compared our data with those of earlier periods. The number of papers describing experimental work involving hPSCs increased further with clear differences in the scientific impact of publications from different countries. Our results confirm the leading position of US-based hPSC research, although to a lesser degree than observed previously. Our data reveal that research into human induced pluripotent stem cells alone surpassed human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research by 2015 and rapidly grew after that. We also report on continuing and even slightly growing research activities in the hESC field as well as on a generally declining rate of the generation of new hESC lines. An increasing portion of new hESC lines represents disease-specific and clinical-grade cell lines. The previously noted usage of only a few early established hESC lines in the vast majority of scientific work is sustained. We also provide a comprehensive overview on clinical trials on the basis of hPSCs. We find that the vast majority of those trials are based on hESC-derived cell products that were generated from an only limited number of relatively old cell lines. : Guhr et al. show that there are marked differences in the impact of recent hPSC research from different countries. The hESC line usage patterns remained mainly unchanged. The authors provide a comprehensive overview on clinical trials involving hPSC-derived cell products and find that these trials are mainly based on hESCs. Keywords: human pluripotent stem cells, human embryonic stem cells, human induced pluripotent stem cells, research, impact, citation frequencies, hESC lines, clinical trials
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213671118302753
work_keys_str_mv AT ankeguhr recenttrendsinresearchwithhumanpluripotentstemcellsimpactofresearchanduseofcelllinesinexperimentalresearchandclinicaltrials
AT sabinekobold recenttrendsinresearchwithhumanpluripotentstemcellsimpactofresearchanduseofcelllinesinexperimentalresearchandclinicaltrials
AT stefanieseltmann recenttrendsinresearchwithhumanpluripotentstemcellsimpactofresearchanduseofcelllinesinexperimentalresearchandclinicaltrials
AT andreaemseilerwulczyn recenttrendsinresearchwithhumanpluripotentstemcellsimpactofresearchanduseofcelllinesinexperimentalresearchandclinicaltrials
AT andreaskurtz recenttrendsinresearchwithhumanpluripotentstemcellsimpactofresearchanduseofcelllinesinexperimentalresearchandclinicaltrials
AT peterloser recenttrendsinresearchwithhumanpluripotentstemcellsimpactofresearchanduseofcelllinesinexperimentalresearchandclinicaltrials
_version_ 1724867860743847936