Do Mass Nouns Constitute a Semantically Uniform Class?

Research on mass nouns has focused on concrete terms. So, are there semantic properties shared by all mass terms? We first consider concrete nouns like milk and furniture. Contra Cheng (1973), we show that they can be held to refer distributively (i.e. to apply to any part of what they apply to) onl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolas, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Kansas, Department of Linguistics 2002-01-01
Series:Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1808/591
Description
Summary:Research on mass nouns has focused on concrete terms. So, are there semantic properties shared by all mass terms? We first consider concrete nouns like milk and furniture. Contra Cheng (1973), we show that they can be held to refer distributively (i.e. to apply to any part of what they apply to) only if this property is understood with a new part-relation, that of N -part. In addition, they refer cumulatively: when they apply to each of two things, they also apply to the two things considered together. We then turn to abstract mass terms like beauty and love. We find, surprisingly, that they too refer distributively and cumulatively.
ISSN:2378-7600