Practical examination of bystanders performing Basic Life Support in Germany: a prospective manikin study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In an out-of-hospital emergency situation bystander intervention is essential for a sufficient functioning of the chain of rescue. The basic measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Basic Life Support – BLS) by lay people are there...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahr Jan, Wilke Henryk, Wiese Christoph HR, Graf Bernhard M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-11-01
Series:BMC Emergency Medicine
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/8/14
id doaj-69978726afa44da393de70a6a4f3c9c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69978726afa44da393de70a6a4f3c9c32020-11-25T02:33:51ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2008-11-01811410.1186/1471-227X-8-14Practical examination of bystanders performing Basic Life Support in Germany: a prospective manikin studyBahr JanWilke HenrykWiese Christoph HRGraf Bernhard M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In an out-of-hospital emergency situation bystander intervention is essential for a sufficient functioning of the chain of rescue. The basic measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Basic Life Support – BLS) by lay people are therefore definitely part of an effective emergency service of a patient needing resuscitation. Relevant knowledge is provided to the public by various course conceptions. The learning success concerning a one day first aid course ("LSM" course in Germany) has not been much investigated in the past. We investigated to what extent lay people could perform BLS correctly in a standardised manikin scenario. An aim of this study was to show how course repetitions affected success in performing BLS.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The "LSM course" was carried out in a standardised manner. We tested prospectively 100 participants in two groups (<b>Group 1: </b>Participants with previous attendance of a BLS course; <b>Group 2: </b>Participants with no previous attendance of a BLS course) in their practical abilities in BLS after the course. Success parameter was the correct performance of BLS in accordance with the current ERC guidelines.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty-two (22%) of the 100 investigated participants obtained satisfactory results in the practical performance of BLS. Participants with repeated participation in BLS obtained significantly better results (<b>Group 1: </b>32.7% vs. <b>Group 2: </b>10.4%; p < 0.01) than course participants with no relevant previous knowledge.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Only 22% of the investigated participants at the end of a "LSM course" were able to perform BLS satisfactorily according to the ERC guidelines. Participants who had previously attended comparable courses obtained significantly better results in the practical test. Through regular repetitions it seems to be possible to achieve, at least on the manikin, an improvement of the results in bystander resuscitation and, consequently, a better patient outcome. To validate this hypothesis further investigations are recommended by specialised societies.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/8/14
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bahr Jan
Wilke Henryk
Wiese Christoph HR
Graf Bernhard M
spellingShingle Bahr Jan
Wilke Henryk
Wiese Christoph HR
Graf Bernhard M
Practical examination of bystanders performing Basic Life Support in Germany: a prospective manikin study
BMC Emergency Medicine
author_facet Bahr Jan
Wilke Henryk
Wiese Christoph HR
Graf Bernhard M
author_sort Bahr Jan
title Practical examination of bystanders performing Basic Life Support in Germany: a prospective manikin study
title_short Practical examination of bystanders performing Basic Life Support in Germany: a prospective manikin study
title_full Practical examination of bystanders performing Basic Life Support in Germany: a prospective manikin study
title_fullStr Practical examination of bystanders performing Basic Life Support in Germany: a prospective manikin study
title_full_unstemmed Practical examination of bystanders performing Basic Life Support in Germany: a prospective manikin study
title_sort practical examination of bystanders performing basic life support in germany: a prospective manikin study
publisher BMC
series BMC Emergency Medicine
issn 1471-227X
publishDate 2008-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In an out-of-hospital emergency situation bystander intervention is essential for a sufficient functioning of the chain of rescue. The basic measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Basic Life Support – BLS) by lay people are therefore definitely part of an effective emergency service of a patient needing resuscitation. Relevant knowledge is provided to the public by various course conceptions. The learning success concerning a one day first aid course ("LSM" course in Germany) has not been much investigated in the past. We investigated to what extent lay people could perform BLS correctly in a standardised manikin scenario. An aim of this study was to show how course repetitions affected success in performing BLS.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The "LSM course" was carried out in a standardised manner. We tested prospectively 100 participants in two groups (<b>Group 1: </b>Participants with previous attendance of a BLS course; <b>Group 2: </b>Participants with no previous attendance of a BLS course) in their practical abilities in BLS after the course. Success parameter was the correct performance of BLS in accordance with the current ERC guidelines.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty-two (22%) of the 100 investigated participants obtained satisfactory results in the practical performance of BLS. Participants with repeated participation in BLS obtained significantly better results (<b>Group 1: </b>32.7% vs. <b>Group 2: </b>10.4%; p < 0.01) than course participants with no relevant previous knowledge.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Only 22% of the investigated participants at the end of a "LSM course" were able to perform BLS satisfactorily according to the ERC guidelines. Participants who had previously attended comparable courses obtained significantly better results in the practical test. Through regular repetitions it seems to be possible to achieve, at least on the manikin, an improvement of the results in bystander resuscitation and, consequently, a better patient outcome. To validate this hypothesis further investigations are recommended by specialised societies.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/8/14
work_keys_str_mv AT bahrjan practicalexaminationofbystandersperformingbasiclifesupportingermanyaprospectivemanikinstudy
AT wilkehenryk practicalexaminationofbystandersperformingbasiclifesupportingermanyaprospectivemanikinstudy
AT wiesechristophhr practicalexaminationofbystandersperformingbasiclifesupportingermanyaprospectivemanikinstudy
AT grafbernhardm practicalexaminationofbystandersperformingbasiclifesupportingermanyaprospectivemanikinstudy
_version_ 1724812044954238976