Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization

In the procedural justice literature, usually four elements are distinguished that are assumed to contribute to the experienced feelings of justice of those who are confronted with the power of the authorities: voice, neutrality, respect & dignity, and trust in the authorities. According to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miranda Boone, Mieke Kox
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2014-11-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.294/
id doaj-69400661c95d4dd19649c3a629185bfa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69400661c95d4dd19649c3a629185bfa2020-11-25T03:53:47ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2014-11-0110411813010.18352/ulr.294288Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus IndividualizationMiranda Boone0Mieke Kox1Utrecht University School of LawErasmus University RotterdamIn the procedural justice literature, usually four elements are distinguished that are assumed to contribute to the experienced feelings of justice of those who are confronted with the power of the authorities: voice, neutrality, respect & dignity, and trust in the authorities. According to Tyler (2010), the same elements are decisive for the experienced feelings of legitimacy of prisoners and other persons subjected to penal correction. From the general prison literature, however, it becomes clear that besides neutrality and consistency, also individual treatment is an important element of how prisoners perceive legitimacy in prison. Based on the results of a qualitative study of the experiences of Belgian prisoners detained in a Dutch penitentiary the tension between consistency and individuality is defined and further developed. The results of this study can have a broader significance than for the prison field as such, since the tension between individualized treatment and consistency is a topic that has so far been neglected in the procedural justice literature.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.294/procedural justicefairnessprisonprisoner-staff relationsneutralityconsistencyindividualization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miranda Boone
Mieke Kox
spellingShingle Miranda Boone
Mieke Kox
Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization
Utrecht Law Review
procedural justice
fairness
prison
prisoner-staff relations
neutrality
consistency
individualization
author_facet Miranda Boone
Mieke Kox
author_sort Miranda Boone
title Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization
title_short Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization
title_full Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization
title_fullStr Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization
title_full_unstemmed Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization
title_sort neutrality as an element of perceived justice in prison: consistency versus individualization
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2014-11-01
description In the procedural justice literature, usually four elements are distinguished that are assumed to contribute to the experienced feelings of justice of those who are confronted with the power of the authorities: voice, neutrality, respect & dignity, and trust in the authorities. According to Tyler (2010), the same elements are decisive for the experienced feelings of legitimacy of prisoners and other persons subjected to penal correction. From the general prison literature, however, it becomes clear that besides neutrality and consistency, also individual treatment is an important element of how prisoners perceive legitimacy in prison. Based on the results of a qualitative study of the experiences of Belgian prisoners detained in a Dutch penitentiary the tension between consistency and individuality is defined and further developed. The results of this study can have a broader significance than for the prison field as such, since the tension between individualized treatment and consistency is a topic that has so far been neglected in the procedural justice literature.
topic procedural justice
fairness
prison
prisoner-staff relations
neutrality
consistency
individualization
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.294/
work_keys_str_mv AT mirandaboone neutralityasanelementofperceivedjusticeinprisonconsistencyversusindividualization
AT miekekox neutralityasanelementofperceivedjusticeinprisonconsistencyversusindividualization
_version_ 1724476665430540288