Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization
In the procedural justice literature, usually four elements are distinguished that are assumed to contribute to the experienced feelings of justice of those who are confronted with the power of the authorities: voice, neutrality, respect & dignity, and trust in the authorities. According to...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University School of Law
2014-11-01
|
Series: | Utrecht Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.294/ |
id |
doaj-69400661c95d4dd19649c3a629185bfa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-69400661c95d4dd19649c3a629185bfa2020-11-25T03:53:47ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2014-11-0110411813010.18352/ulr.294288Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus IndividualizationMiranda Boone0Mieke Kox1Utrecht University School of LawErasmus University RotterdamIn the procedural justice literature, usually four elements are distinguished that are assumed to contribute to the experienced feelings of justice of those who are confronted with the power of the authorities: voice, neutrality, respect & dignity, and trust in the authorities. According to Tyler (2010), the same elements are decisive for the experienced feelings of legitimacy of prisoners and other persons subjected to penal correction. From the general prison literature, however, it becomes clear that besides neutrality and consistency, also individual treatment is an important element of how prisoners perceive legitimacy in prison. Based on the results of a qualitative study of the experiences of Belgian prisoners detained in a Dutch penitentiary the tension between consistency and individuality is defined and further developed. The results of this study can have a broader significance than for the prison field as such, since the tension between individualized treatment and consistency is a topic that has so far been neglected in the procedural justice literature.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.294/procedural justicefairnessprisonprisoner-staff relationsneutralityconsistencyindividualization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Miranda Boone Mieke Kox |
spellingShingle |
Miranda Boone Mieke Kox Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization Utrecht Law Review procedural justice fairness prison prisoner-staff relations neutrality consistency individualization |
author_facet |
Miranda Boone Mieke Kox |
author_sort |
Miranda Boone |
title |
Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization |
title_short |
Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization |
title_full |
Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization |
title_fullStr |
Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neutrality as an Element of Perceived Justice in Prison: Consistency versus Individualization |
title_sort |
neutrality as an element of perceived justice in prison: consistency versus individualization |
publisher |
Utrecht University School of Law |
series |
Utrecht Law Review |
issn |
1871-515X |
publishDate |
2014-11-01 |
description |
In the procedural justice literature, usually four elements are distinguished that are assumed to contribute to the experienced feelings of justice of those who are confronted with the power of the authorities: voice, neutrality, respect & dignity, and trust in the authorities. According to Tyler (2010), the same elements are decisive for the experienced feelings of legitimacy of prisoners and other persons subjected to penal correction. From the general prison literature, however, it becomes clear that besides neutrality and consistency, also individual treatment is an important element of how prisoners perceive legitimacy in prison. Based on the results of a qualitative study of the experiences of Belgian prisoners detained in a Dutch penitentiary the tension between consistency and individuality is defined and further developed. The results of this study can have a broader significance than for the prison field as such, since the tension between individualized treatment and consistency is a topic that has so far been neglected in the procedural justice literature. |
topic |
procedural justice fairness prison prisoner-staff relations neutrality consistency individualization |
url |
http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.294/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mirandaboone neutralityasanelementofperceivedjusticeinprisonconsistencyversusindividualization AT miekekox neutralityasanelementofperceivedjusticeinprisonconsistencyversusindividualization |
_version_ |
1724476665430540288 |