Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in detection of stent stenosis after iliac vein stenting

• Main Authors: Hong Liu, Jing Wang, Yu Zhao, Zheng Chen, Dong Wang, Miao Wei, Fajin Lv, Xiaoping Ye
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2021-01-01
• Series: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
• Subjects: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Multidetector computed tomography venography; Iliac vein obstructive disease; Stent; Follow-up
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01840-3

Abstract Background To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound (DUS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for detection of iliac vein stent stenosis using multidetector computed tomography venography (MDCTV) as the reference method. Methods Patients with iliac vein obstructive disease treated with nitinol stents (Smart Control, Cordis, USA) between January 2016 and December 2017 were consecutively included in this study. DUS, CEUS, and MDCTV were carried out in all patients within one week of each other at 1 year post stenting to investigate the presence of stent compression and in-stent restenosis (ISR). Results The study included 139 patients (87 females; mean age 58 ± 15 years). For detecting stent compression, the kappa coefficient between the ultrasound modality of gray-scale imaging and MDCTV was 0.901, indicating very good agreement between these two modalities. ISR was detected in 50, 61, and 65 patients by DUS, CEUS, and MDCTV, respectively. DUS and CEUS (kappa = 0.449) and DUS and MDCTV (kappa = 0.516) had moderate agreement for ISR diagnosis, while for which CEUS and MDCTV (kappa 0.884) had very good agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of DUS and CEUS for diagnosing ISR were 63.1% and 90.8%, 87.8% and 97.3%, respectively. Conclusions CEUS is probably superior to DUS in terms of diagnostic accuracy for the follow-up of patients with iliac vein stent stenosis.