Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries

<p>Insurance can be an important mechanism to stimulate flood risk reduction and thus decrease losses. However, there is a gap between the theoretical potential described by academic scholars and the actual engagement of insurers. In the analysis, I have collected examples of insurers'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I. Seifert-Dähnn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-09-01
Series:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/18/2409/2018/nhess-18-2409-2018.pdf
id doaj-6927130ec32248929716d9f98a77ca8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6927130ec32248929716d9f98a77ca8d2020-11-24T20:59:26ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812018-09-01182409242910.5194/nhess-18-2409-2018Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countriesI. Seifert-Dähnn0Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway<p>Insurance can be an important mechanism to stimulate flood risk reduction and thus decrease losses. However, there is a gap between the theoretical potential described by academic scholars and the actual engagement of insurers. In the analysis, I have collected examples of insurers' engagement in flood risk reduction, focusing on household and business insurance in developed countries. Insurers engaged either directly, e.g., through co-financing risk reduction, or more indirectly by giving incentives to policyholders or governmental actors to adopt risk reduction measures. I analyzed their engagement with the framing conditions of the market they were acting in, such as market penetration or private or public insurance schemes. I found risk reduction measures like awareness-raising campaigns targeting citizens to be quite common across several countries. There was less insurance engagement in risk reduction measures such as warning or land-use planning, which are perceived to be mainly governmental tasks. The use of risk-based pricing as an incentive for the adoption of risk reduction measures as suggested by academia is difficult in practice, due to barriers such as information gaps on the effectiveness of property-level protection measures and requirements concerning the affordability of insurance. New approaches to overcome these shortfalls include organized data collection on property-level protection measures or the insurance of high-risks for affordable premiums in public–private partnership constellations with the government.</p>https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/18/2409/2018/nhess-18-2409-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I. Seifert-Dähnn
spellingShingle I. Seifert-Dähnn
Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
author_facet I. Seifert-Dähnn
author_sort I. Seifert-Dähnn
title Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries
title_short Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries
title_full Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries
title_fullStr Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries
title_full_unstemmed Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries
title_sort insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
issn 1561-8633
1684-9981
publishDate 2018-09-01
description <p>Insurance can be an important mechanism to stimulate flood risk reduction and thus decrease losses. However, there is a gap between the theoretical potential described by academic scholars and the actual engagement of insurers. In the analysis, I have collected examples of insurers' engagement in flood risk reduction, focusing on household and business insurance in developed countries. Insurers engaged either directly, e.g., through co-financing risk reduction, or more indirectly by giving incentives to policyholders or governmental actors to adopt risk reduction measures. I analyzed their engagement with the framing conditions of the market they were acting in, such as market penetration or private or public insurance schemes. I found risk reduction measures like awareness-raising campaigns targeting citizens to be quite common across several countries. There was less insurance engagement in risk reduction measures such as warning or land-use planning, which are perceived to be mainly governmental tasks. The use of risk-based pricing as an incentive for the adoption of risk reduction measures as suggested by academia is difficult in practice, due to barriers such as information gaps on the effectiveness of property-level protection measures and requirements concerning the affordability of insurance. New approaches to overcome these shortfalls include organized data collection on property-level protection measures or the insurance of high-risks for affordable premiums in public–private partnership constellations with the government.</p>
url https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/18/2409/2018/nhess-18-2409-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT iseifertdahnn insuranceengagementinfloodriskreductionexamplesfromhouseholdandbusinessinsuranceindevelopedcountries
_version_ 1716782345216851968