Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
Abstract Background The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate whi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-x |
id |
doaj-691a4d40ce4f495fb4ef329c006288af |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-691a4d40ce4f495fb4ef329c006288af2020-12-20T12:18:41ZengBMCBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine1472-68822019-12-011911710.1186/s12906-019-2788-xComplementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional studyFreya Waddington0Jenny Lee1Mark Naunton2Greg Kyle3Jackson Thomas4Gabrielle O’Kane5Room12C21, University of CanberraRoom12C21, University of CanberraRoom12C21, University of CanberraQueensland University of TechnologyRoom12C21, University of CanberraRoom12C21, University of CanberraAbstract Background The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate which health professionals have a role in this process. Methods A cross-sectional study of inpatients was conducted at a major tertiary teaching hospital. Patient’s medical records were examined to determine the rates of complementary medicine (CM) use and recording on medication charts and discharge prescriptions. Patient progress notes were audited to determine which health professionals were involved with the initiation or cessation of CMs during the inpatient stay. Results Three hundred and forty-one patients were included for analysis of which 44.3% (n = 151) participants were recorded as utilizing a CM. Patients were admitted on a mean of 2 (±1.4[Sd]; 0–9[range]) CMs and discharged on a mean of 1.7 CMs (±1.3[Sd]; 0–5[range]). 274 individual CMs were recorded on inpatient medication reconciliation forms with multivitamins, magnesium, fish oil and cholecalciferol recorded the most frequently. One hundred and fifty-eight changes to patient CM usage were recorded during the patient hospitalisation. One hundred and seven of these changes (68%) were not accounted for in the patient progress notes. Conclusion Patients use of CM in this hospital setting do not reflect the national estimated usage. On the occasions that CM products are included in patient records, they are subsequently deprescribed following patient examination in hospital. It is currently unclear which health professionals have a role in this deprescribing process.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-xComplementary medicineHospitalPrescribingPharmacyPharmacist |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Freya Waddington Jenny Lee Mark Naunton Greg Kyle Jackson Thomas Gabrielle O’Kane |
spellingShingle |
Freya Waddington Jenny Lee Mark Naunton Greg Kyle Jackson Thomas Gabrielle O’Kane Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine Complementary medicine Hospital Prescribing Pharmacy Pharmacist |
author_facet |
Freya Waddington Jenny Lee Mark Naunton Greg Kyle Jackson Thomas Gabrielle O’Kane |
author_sort |
Freya Waddington |
title |
Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study |
title_short |
Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study |
title_full |
Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study |
title_fullStr |
Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study |
title_sort |
complementary medicine use among australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
issn |
1472-6882 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate which health professionals have a role in this process. Methods A cross-sectional study of inpatients was conducted at a major tertiary teaching hospital. Patient’s medical records were examined to determine the rates of complementary medicine (CM) use and recording on medication charts and discharge prescriptions. Patient progress notes were audited to determine which health professionals were involved with the initiation or cessation of CMs during the inpatient stay. Results Three hundred and forty-one patients were included for analysis of which 44.3% (n = 151) participants were recorded as utilizing a CM. Patients were admitted on a mean of 2 (±1.4[Sd]; 0–9[range]) CMs and discharged on a mean of 1.7 CMs (±1.3[Sd]; 0–5[range]). 274 individual CMs were recorded on inpatient medication reconciliation forms with multivitamins, magnesium, fish oil and cholecalciferol recorded the most frequently. One hundred and fifty-eight changes to patient CM usage were recorded during the patient hospitalisation. One hundred and seven of these changes (68%) were not accounted for in the patient progress notes. Conclusion Patients use of CM in this hospital setting do not reflect the national estimated usage. On the occasions that CM products are included in patient records, they are subsequently deprescribed following patient examination in hospital. It is currently unclear which health professionals have a role in this deprescribing process. |
topic |
Complementary medicine Hospital Prescribing Pharmacy Pharmacist |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT freyawaddington complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT jennylee complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT marknaunton complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT gregkyle complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT jacksonthomas complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT gabrielleokane complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy |
_version_ |
1724376717289586688 |