Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study

Abstract Background The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate whi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Freya Waddington, Jenny Lee, Mark Naunton, Greg Kyle, Jackson Thomas, Gabrielle O’Kane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-x
id doaj-691a4d40ce4f495fb4ef329c006288af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-691a4d40ce4f495fb4ef329c006288af2020-12-20T12:18:41ZengBMCBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine1472-68822019-12-011911710.1186/s12906-019-2788-xComplementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional studyFreya Waddington0Jenny Lee1Mark Naunton2Greg Kyle3Jackson Thomas4Gabrielle O’Kane5Room12C21, University of CanberraRoom12C21, University of CanberraRoom12C21, University of CanberraQueensland University of TechnologyRoom12C21, University of CanberraRoom12C21, University of CanberraAbstract Background The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate which health professionals have a role in this process. Methods A cross-sectional study of inpatients was conducted at a major tertiary teaching hospital. Patient’s medical records were examined to determine the rates of complementary medicine (CM) use and recording on medication charts and discharge prescriptions. Patient progress notes were audited to determine which health professionals were involved with the initiation or cessation of CMs during the inpatient stay. Results Three hundred and forty-one patients were included for analysis of which 44.3% (n = 151) participants were recorded as utilizing a CM. Patients were admitted on a mean of 2 (±1.4[Sd]; 0–9[range]) CMs and discharged on a mean of 1.7 CMs (±1.3[Sd]; 0–5[range]). 274 individual CMs were recorded on inpatient medication reconciliation forms with multivitamins, magnesium, fish oil and cholecalciferol recorded the most frequently. One hundred and fifty-eight changes to patient CM usage were recorded during the patient hospitalisation. One hundred and seven of these changes (68%) were not accounted for in the patient progress notes. Conclusion Patients use of CM in this hospital setting do not reflect the national estimated usage. On the occasions that CM products are included in patient records, they are subsequently deprescribed following patient examination in hospital. It is currently unclear which health professionals have a role in this deprescribing process.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-xComplementary medicineHospitalPrescribingPharmacyPharmacist
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Freya Waddington
Jenny Lee
Mark Naunton
Greg Kyle
Jackson Thomas
Gabrielle O’Kane
spellingShingle Freya Waddington
Jenny Lee
Mark Naunton
Greg Kyle
Jackson Thomas
Gabrielle O’Kane
Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Complementary medicine
Hospital
Prescribing
Pharmacy
Pharmacist
author_facet Freya Waddington
Jenny Lee
Mark Naunton
Greg Kyle
Jackson Thomas
Gabrielle O’Kane
author_sort Freya Waddington
title Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_short Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_full Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_fullStr Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_sort complementary medicine use among australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
publisher BMC
series BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
issn 1472-6882
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate which health professionals have a role in this process. Methods A cross-sectional study of inpatients was conducted at a major tertiary teaching hospital. Patient’s medical records were examined to determine the rates of complementary medicine (CM) use and recording on medication charts and discharge prescriptions. Patient progress notes were audited to determine which health professionals were involved with the initiation or cessation of CMs during the inpatient stay. Results Three hundred and forty-one patients were included for analysis of which 44.3% (n = 151) participants were recorded as utilizing a CM. Patients were admitted on a mean of 2 (±1.4[Sd]; 0–9[range]) CMs and discharged on a mean of 1.7 CMs (±1.3[Sd]; 0–5[range]). 274 individual CMs were recorded on inpatient medication reconciliation forms with multivitamins, magnesium, fish oil and cholecalciferol recorded the most frequently. One hundred and fifty-eight changes to patient CM usage were recorded during the patient hospitalisation. One hundred and seven of these changes (68%) were not accounted for in the patient progress notes. Conclusion Patients use of CM in this hospital setting do not reflect the national estimated usage. On the occasions that CM products are included in patient records, they are subsequently deprescribed following patient examination in hospital. It is currently unclear which health professionals have a role in this deprescribing process.
topic Complementary medicine
Hospital
Prescribing
Pharmacy
Pharmacist
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-x
work_keys_str_mv AT freyawaddington complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT jennylee complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT marknaunton complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT gregkyle complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT jacksonthomas complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT gabrielleokane complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1724376717289586688