‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety
Background: This study explored the perspectives and experiences from patients and families around how patient/family preferences and priorities are considered in medication-related discussions and decisions within the healthcare system. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups w...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098619838796 |
id |
doaj-6917714163d14b1db22dc871ff97a3f8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6917714163d14b1db22dc871ff97a3f82020-11-25T03:52:03ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Drug Safety2042-09942019-04-011010.1177/2042098619838796‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safetyDee ManginCathy RisdonLarkin LamarcheJessica LangevinAbbas AliJenna ParascandaloGaibrie StephenJohanna TrimbleBackground: This study explored the perspectives and experiences from patients and families around how patient/family preferences and priorities are considered in medication-related discussions and decisions within the healthcare system. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups with residents of Southern Ontario and British Columbia ( N = 16). Three focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured focus group guide. The audiotaped focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis, using inductive coding, was completed. Results: A total of three main themes [and several sub-themes (and sub-sub-themes)] emerged from the data: patient and family expertise [ lived experience, information expert , and perceived expert roles (patient/family, healthcare provider)], perceived patient-centredness ( relationship qualities of healthcare provider and assumptions about patients ), and system ( time, coordination and communication , and culture ). Stories told by participants helped to clarify the relationships between the themes and sub-themes, leading to, what we understand as shared decision-making around medications and subsequent health outcomes. Conclusions: Our findings showed that shared decision-making resulted from both recognition and integration of the personal expertise of the patient and family in medications, and perceived patient-centredness. This is broadly consistent with the current conceptualization of evidence-based medicine. The stories told highlight the complex, dynamic, and nonlinear nature of shared decision-making for medications, and that patient priorities are not as integrated into shared decision-making about medications as we would hope. This suggests the need for developing a systematic process to elicit, record, and integrate patient preferences and priorities about medications to create space for a more patient-centred conversation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098619838796 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dee Mangin Cathy Risdon Larkin Lamarche Jessica Langevin Abbas Ali Jenna Parascandalo Gaibrie Stephen Johanna Trimble |
spellingShingle |
Dee Mangin Cathy Risdon Larkin Lamarche Jessica Langevin Abbas Ali Jenna Parascandalo Gaibrie Stephen Johanna Trimble ‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety |
author_facet |
Dee Mangin Cathy Risdon Larkin Lamarche Jessica Langevin Abbas Ali Jenna Parascandalo Gaibrie Stephen Johanna Trimble |
author_sort |
Dee Mangin |
title |
‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety |
title_short |
‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety |
title_full |
‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety |
title_fullStr |
‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety |
title_sort |
‘i think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety |
issn |
2042-0994 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Background: This study explored the perspectives and experiences from patients and families around how patient/family preferences and priorities are considered in medication-related discussions and decisions within the healthcare system. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups with residents of Southern Ontario and British Columbia ( N = 16). Three focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured focus group guide. The audiotaped focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis, using inductive coding, was completed. Results: A total of three main themes [and several sub-themes (and sub-sub-themes)] emerged from the data: patient and family expertise [ lived experience, information expert , and perceived expert roles (patient/family, healthcare provider)], perceived patient-centredness ( relationship qualities of healthcare provider and assumptions about patients ), and system ( time, coordination and communication , and culture ). Stories told by participants helped to clarify the relationships between the themes and sub-themes, leading to, what we understand as shared decision-making around medications and subsequent health outcomes. Conclusions: Our findings showed that shared decision-making resulted from both recognition and integration of the personal expertise of the patient and family in medications, and perceived patient-centredness. This is broadly consistent with the current conceptualization of evidence-based medicine. The stories told highlight the complex, dynamic, and nonlinear nature of shared decision-making for medications, and that patient priorities are not as integrated into shared decision-making about medications as we would hope. This suggests the need for developing a systematic process to elicit, record, and integrate patient preferences and priorities about medications to create space for a more patient-centred conversation. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098619838796 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT deemangin ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety AT cathyrisdon ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety AT larkinlamarche ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety AT jessicalangevin ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety AT abbasali ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety AT jennaparascandalo ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety AT gaibriestephen ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety AT johannatrimble ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety |
_version_ |
1724484635646230528 |