‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety

Background: This study explored the perspectives and experiences from patients and families around how patient/family preferences and priorities are considered in medication-related discussions and decisions within the healthcare system. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dee Mangin, Cathy Risdon, Larkin Lamarche, Jessica Langevin, Abbas Ali, Jenna Parascandalo, Gaibrie Stephen, Johanna Trimble
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-04-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098619838796
id doaj-6917714163d14b1db22dc871ff97a3f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6917714163d14b1db22dc871ff97a3f82020-11-25T03:52:03ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Drug Safety2042-09942019-04-011010.1177/2042098619838796‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safetyDee ManginCathy RisdonLarkin LamarcheJessica LangevinAbbas AliJenna ParascandaloGaibrie StephenJohanna TrimbleBackground: This study explored the perspectives and experiences from patients and families around how patient/family preferences and priorities are considered in medication-related discussions and decisions within the healthcare system. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups with residents of Southern Ontario and British Columbia ( N = 16). Three focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured focus group guide. The audiotaped focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis, using inductive coding, was completed. Results: A total of three main themes [and several sub-themes (and sub-sub-themes)] emerged from the data: patient and family expertise [ lived experience, information expert , and perceived expert roles (patient/family, healthcare provider)], perceived patient-centredness ( relationship qualities of healthcare provider and assumptions about patients ), and system ( time, coordination and communication , and culture ). Stories told by participants helped to clarify the relationships between the themes and sub-themes, leading to, what we understand as shared decision-making around medications and subsequent health outcomes. Conclusions: Our findings showed that shared decision-making resulted from both recognition and integration of the personal expertise of the patient and family in medications, and perceived patient-centredness. This is broadly consistent with the current conceptualization of evidence-based medicine. The stories told highlight the complex, dynamic, and nonlinear nature of shared decision-making for medications, and that patient priorities are not as integrated into shared decision-making about medications as we would hope. This suggests the need for developing a systematic process to elicit, record, and integrate patient preferences and priorities about medications to create space for a more patient-centred conversation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098619838796
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dee Mangin
Cathy Risdon
Larkin Lamarche
Jessica Langevin
Abbas Ali
Jenna Parascandalo
Gaibrie Stephen
Johanna Trimble
spellingShingle Dee Mangin
Cathy Risdon
Larkin Lamarche
Jessica Langevin
Abbas Ali
Jenna Parascandalo
Gaibrie Stephen
Johanna Trimble
‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
author_facet Dee Mangin
Cathy Risdon
Larkin Lamarche
Jessica Langevin
Abbas Ali
Jenna Parascandalo
Gaibrie Stephen
Johanna Trimble
author_sort Dee Mangin
title ‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety
title_short ‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety
title_full ‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety
title_fullStr ‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety
title_full_unstemmed ‘I think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety
title_sort ‘i think this medicine actually killed my wife’: patient and family perspectives on shared decision-making to optimize medications and safety
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
issn 2042-0994
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Background: This study explored the perspectives and experiences from patients and families around how patient/family preferences and priorities are considered in medication-related discussions and decisions within the healthcare system. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups with residents of Southern Ontario and British Columbia ( N = 16). Three focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured focus group guide. The audiotaped focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis, using inductive coding, was completed. Results: A total of three main themes [and several sub-themes (and sub-sub-themes)] emerged from the data: patient and family expertise [ lived experience, information expert , and perceived expert roles (patient/family, healthcare provider)], perceived patient-centredness ( relationship qualities of healthcare provider and assumptions about patients ), and system ( time, coordination and communication , and culture ). Stories told by participants helped to clarify the relationships between the themes and sub-themes, leading to, what we understand as shared decision-making around medications and subsequent health outcomes. Conclusions: Our findings showed that shared decision-making resulted from both recognition and integration of the personal expertise of the patient and family in medications, and perceived patient-centredness. This is broadly consistent with the current conceptualization of evidence-based medicine. The stories told highlight the complex, dynamic, and nonlinear nature of shared decision-making for medications, and that patient priorities are not as integrated into shared decision-making about medications as we would hope. This suggests the need for developing a systematic process to elicit, record, and integrate patient preferences and priorities about medications to create space for a more patient-centred conversation.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098619838796
work_keys_str_mv AT deemangin ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety
AT cathyrisdon ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety
AT larkinlamarche ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety
AT jessicalangevin ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety
AT abbasali ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety
AT jennaparascandalo ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety
AT gaibriestephen ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety
AT johannatrimble ithinkthismedicineactuallykilledmywifepatientandfamilyperspectivesonshareddecisionmakingtooptimizemedicationsandsafety
_version_ 1724484635646230528