What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level
Despite the need for a strong Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforce, there is a high attrition rate for students who intend to complete undergraduate majors in these disciplines. Students who leave STEM degree programs often cite uninspiring instruction in introductory courses,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2017.00068/full |
id |
doaj-690217130af842b3af5820490150fea1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-690217130af842b3af5820490150fea12020-11-25T02:58:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2018-01-01210.3389/feduc.2017.00068322697What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University LevelKenneth Akiha0Kenneth Akiha1Emilie Brigham2Emilie Brigham3Brian A. Couch4Justin Lewin5Justin Lewin6Marilyne Stains7MacKenzie R. Stetzer8MacKenzie R. Stetzer9Erin L. Vinson10Erin L. Vinson11Michelle K. Smith12Michelle K. Smith13School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, United StatesSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesDespite the need for a strong Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforce, there is a high attrition rate for students who intend to complete undergraduate majors in these disciplines. Students who leave STEM degree programs often cite uninspiring instruction in introductory courses, including traditional lecturing, as a reason. While undergraduate courses play a critical role in STEM retention, little is understood about the instructional transitions students encounter upon moving from secondary to post-secondary STEM courses. This study compares classroom observation data collected using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM from over 450 middle school, high school, introductory-level university, and advanced-level university classes across STEM disciplines. We find similarities between middle school and high school classroom instruction, which are characterized by a large proportion of time spent on active-learning instructional strategies, such as small-group activities and peer discussion. By contrast, introductory and advanced university instructors devote more time to instructor-centered teaching strategies, such as lecturing. These instructor-centered teaching strategies are present in classes regardless of class enrollment size, class period length, or whether or not the class includes a separate laboratory section. Middle school, high school, and university instructors were also surveyed about their views of what STEM instructional practices are most common at each educational level and asked to provide an explanation of those perceptions. Instructors from all levels struggled to predict the level of lecturing practices and often expressed uncertainty about what instruction looks like at levels other than their own. These findings suggest that more opportunities need to be created for instructors across multiple levels of the education system to share their active-learning teaching practices and discuss the transitions students are making between different educational levels.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2017.00068/fullactive-learningclassroom observationsecondary educationundergraduate educationeducational transitions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kenneth Akiha Kenneth Akiha Emilie Brigham Emilie Brigham Brian A. Couch Justin Lewin Justin Lewin Marilyne Stains MacKenzie R. Stetzer MacKenzie R. Stetzer Erin L. Vinson Erin L. Vinson Michelle K. Smith Michelle K. Smith |
spellingShingle |
Kenneth Akiha Kenneth Akiha Emilie Brigham Emilie Brigham Brian A. Couch Justin Lewin Justin Lewin Marilyne Stains MacKenzie R. Stetzer MacKenzie R. Stetzer Erin L. Vinson Erin L. Vinson Michelle K. Smith Michelle K. Smith What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level Frontiers in Education active-learning classroom observation secondary education undergraduate education educational transitions |
author_facet |
Kenneth Akiha Kenneth Akiha Emilie Brigham Emilie Brigham Brian A. Couch Justin Lewin Justin Lewin Marilyne Stains MacKenzie R. Stetzer MacKenzie R. Stetzer Erin L. Vinson Erin L. Vinson Michelle K. Smith Michelle K. Smith |
author_sort |
Kenneth Akiha |
title |
What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level |
title_short |
What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level |
title_full |
What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level |
title_fullStr |
What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level |
title_sort |
what types of instructional shifts do students experience? investigating active learning in science, technology, engineering, and math classes across key transition points from middle school to the university level |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Education |
issn |
2504-284X |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Despite the need for a strong Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforce, there is a high attrition rate for students who intend to complete undergraduate majors in these disciplines. Students who leave STEM degree programs often cite uninspiring instruction in introductory courses, including traditional lecturing, as a reason. While undergraduate courses play a critical role in STEM retention, little is understood about the instructional transitions students encounter upon moving from secondary to post-secondary STEM courses. This study compares classroom observation data collected using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM from over 450 middle school, high school, introductory-level university, and advanced-level university classes across STEM disciplines. We find similarities between middle school and high school classroom instruction, which are characterized by a large proportion of time spent on active-learning instructional strategies, such as small-group activities and peer discussion. By contrast, introductory and advanced university instructors devote more time to instructor-centered teaching strategies, such as lecturing. These instructor-centered teaching strategies are present in classes regardless of class enrollment size, class period length, or whether or not the class includes a separate laboratory section. Middle school, high school, and university instructors were also surveyed about their views of what STEM instructional practices are most common at each educational level and asked to provide an explanation of those perceptions. Instructors from all levels struggled to predict the level of lecturing practices and often expressed uncertainty about what instruction looks like at levels other than their own. These findings suggest that more opportunities need to be created for instructors across multiple levels of the education system to share their active-learning teaching practices and discuss the transitions students are making between different educational levels. |
topic |
active-learning classroom observation secondary education undergraduate education educational transitions |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2017.00068/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kennethakiha whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT kennethakiha whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT emiliebrigham whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT emiliebrigham whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT brianacouch whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT justinlewin whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT justinlewin whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT marilynestains whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT mackenzierstetzer whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT mackenzierstetzer whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT erinlvinson whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT erinlvinson whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT michelleksmith whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel AT michelleksmith whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel |
_version_ |
1724706909344235520 |