What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level

Despite the need for a strong Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforce, there is a high attrition rate for students who intend to complete undergraduate majors in these disciplines. Students who leave STEM degree programs often cite uninspiring instruction in introductory courses,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenneth Akiha, Emilie Brigham, Brian A. Couch, Justin Lewin, Marilyne Stains, MacKenzie R. Stetzer, Erin L. Vinson, Michelle K. Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2017.00068/full
id doaj-690217130af842b3af5820490150fea1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-690217130af842b3af5820490150fea12020-11-25T02:58:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2018-01-01210.3389/feduc.2017.00068322697What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University LevelKenneth Akiha0Kenneth Akiha1Emilie Brigham2Emilie Brigham3Brian A. Couch4Justin Lewin5Justin Lewin6Marilyne Stains7MacKenzie R. Stetzer8MacKenzie R. Stetzer9Erin L. Vinson10Erin L. Vinson11Michelle K. Smith12Michelle K. Smith13School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, United StatesSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesMaine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United StatesDespite the need for a strong Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforce, there is a high attrition rate for students who intend to complete undergraduate majors in these disciplines. Students who leave STEM degree programs often cite uninspiring instruction in introductory courses, including traditional lecturing, as a reason. While undergraduate courses play a critical role in STEM retention, little is understood about the instructional transitions students encounter upon moving from secondary to post-secondary STEM courses. This study compares classroom observation data collected using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM from over 450 middle school, high school, introductory-level university, and advanced-level university classes across STEM disciplines. We find similarities between middle school and high school classroom instruction, which are characterized by a large proportion of time spent on active-learning instructional strategies, such as small-group activities and peer discussion. By contrast, introductory and advanced university instructors devote more time to instructor-centered teaching strategies, such as lecturing. These instructor-centered teaching strategies are present in classes regardless of class enrollment size, class period length, or whether or not the class includes a separate laboratory section. Middle school, high school, and university instructors were also surveyed about their views of what STEM instructional practices are most common at each educational level and asked to provide an explanation of those perceptions. Instructors from all levels struggled to predict the level of lecturing practices and often expressed uncertainty about what instruction looks like at levels other than their own. These findings suggest that more opportunities need to be created for instructors across multiple levels of the education system to share their active-learning teaching practices and discuss the transitions students are making between different educational levels.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2017.00068/fullactive-learningclassroom observationsecondary educationundergraduate educationeducational transitions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenneth Akiha
Kenneth Akiha
Emilie Brigham
Emilie Brigham
Brian A. Couch
Justin Lewin
Justin Lewin
Marilyne Stains
MacKenzie R. Stetzer
MacKenzie R. Stetzer
Erin L. Vinson
Erin L. Vinson
Michelle K. Smith
Michelle K. Smith
spellingShingle Kenneth Akiha
Kenneth Akiha
Emilie Brigham
Emilie Brigham
Brian A. Couch
Justin Lewin
Justin Lewin
Marilyne Stains
MacKenzie R. Stetzer
MacKenzie R. Stetzer
Erin L. Vinson
Erin L. Vinson
Michelle K. Smith
Michelle K. Smith
What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level
Frontiers in Education
active-learning
classroom observation
secondary education
undergraduate education
educational transitions
author_facet Kenneth Akiha
Kenneth Akiha
Emilie Brigham
Emilie Brigham
Brian A. Couch
Justin Lewin
Justin Lewin
Marilyne Stains
MacKenzie R. Stetzer
MacKenzie R. Stetzer
Erin L. Vinson
Erin L. Vinson
Michelle K. Smith
Michelle K. Smith
author_sort Kenneth Akiha
title What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level
title_short What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level
title_full What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level
title_fullStr What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level
title_full_unstemmed What Types of Instructional Shifts Do Students Experience? Investigating Active Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes across Key Transition Points from Middle School to the University Level
title_sort what types of instructional shifts do students experience? investigating active learning in science, technology, engineering, and math classes across key transition points from middle school to the university level
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Education
issn 2504-284X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Despite the need for a strong Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforce, there is a high attrition rate for students who intend to complete undergraduate majors in these disciplines. Students who leave STEM degree programs often cite uninspiring instruction in introductory courses, including traditional lecturing, as a reason. While undergraduate courses play a critical role in STEM retention, little is understood about the instructional transitions students encounter upon moving from secondary to post-secondary STEM courses. This study compares classroom observation data collected using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM from over 450 middle school, high school, introductory-level university, and advanced-level university classes across STEM disciplines. We find similarities between middle school and high school classroom instruction, which are characterized by a large proportion of time spent on active-learning instructional strategies, such as small-group activities and peer discussion. By contrast, introductory and advanced university instructors devote more time to instructor-centered teaching strategies, such as lecturing. These instructor-centered teaching strategies are present in classes regardless of class enrollment size, class period length, or whether or not the class includes a separate laboratory section. Middle school, high school, and university instructors were also surveyed about their views of what STEM instructional practices are most common at each educational level and asked to provide an explanation of those perceptions. Instructors from all levels struggled to predict the level of lecturing practices and often expressed uncertainty about what instruction looks like at levels other than their own. These findings suggest that more opportunities need to be created for instructors across multiple levels of the education system to share their active-learning teaching practices and discuss the transitions students are making between different educational levels.
topic active-learning
classroom observation
secondary education
undergraduate education
educational transitions
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2017.00068/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethakiha whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT kennethakiha whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT emiliebrigham whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT emiliebrigham whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT brianacouch whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT justinlewin whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT justinlewin whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT marilynestains whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT mackenzierstetzer whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT mackenzierstetzer whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT erinlvinson whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT erinlvinson whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT michelleksmith whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
AT michelleksmith whattypesofinstructionalshiftsdostudentsexperienceinvestigatingactivelearninginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathclassesacrosskeytransitionpointsfrommiddleschooltotheuniversitylevel
_version_ 1724706909344235520