A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.

Gene therapy represents an alternative and promising anti-HIV modality to highly active antiretroviral therapy. It involves the introduction of a protective gene into a cell, thereby conferring protection against HIV. While clinical trials to date have delivered gene therapy to CD4+T cells or to CD3...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Borislav Savkovic, James Nichols, Donald Birkett, Tanya Applegate, Scott Ledger, Geoff Symonds, John M Murray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-06-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4063676?pdf=render
id doaj-68e152bdb4fc417e99d5bd16696ae504
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68e152bdb4fc417e99d5bd16696ae5042020-11-24T21:55:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582014-06-01106e100368110.1371/journal.pcbi.1003681A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.Borislav SavkovicJames NicholsDonald BirkettTanya ApplegateScott LedgerGeoff SymondsJohn M MurrayGene therapy represents an alternative and promising anti-HIV modality to highly active antiretroviral therapy. It involves the introduction of a protective gene into a cell, thereby conferring protection against HIV. While clinical trials to date have delivered gene therapy to CD4+T cells or to CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), the relative benefits of each of these two cellular targets have not been conclusively determined. In the present analysis, we investigated the relative merits of delivering a dual construct (CCR5 entry inhibitor + C46 fusion inhibitor) to either CD4+T cells or to CD34+ HSC. Using mathematical modelling, we determined the impact of each scenario in terms of total CD4+T cell counts over a 10 year period, and also in terms of inhibition of CCR5 and CXCR4 tropic virus. Our modelling determined that therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC generally resulted in better outcomes than delivery to CD4+T cells. An early one-off therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC, assuming that 20% of CD34+ HSC in the bone marrow were gene-modified (G+), resulted in total CD4+T cell counts ≥ 180 cells/ µL in peripheral blood after 10 years. If the uninfected G+ CD4+T cells (in addition to exhibiting lower likelihood of becoming productively infected) also exhibited reduced levels of bystander apoptosis (92.5% reduction) over non gene-modified (G-) CD4+T cells, then total CD4+T cell counts of ≥ 350 cells/ µL were observed after 10 years, even if initially only 10% of CD34+ HSC in the bone marrow received the protective gene. Taken together our results indicate that: 1.) therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC will result in better outcomes than delivery to CD4+T cells, and 2.) a greater impact of gene therapy will be observed if G+ CD4+T cells exhibit reduced levels of bystander apoptosis over G- CD4+T cells.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4063676?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Borislav Savkovic
James Nichols
Donald Birkett
Tanya Applegate
Scott Ledger
Geoff Symonds
John M Murray
spellingShingle Borislav Savkovic
James Nichols
Donald Birkett
Tanya Applegate
Scott Ledger
Geoff Symonds
John M Murray
A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Borislav Savkovic
James Nichols
Donald Birkett
Tanya Applegate
Scott Ledger
Geoff Symonds
John M Murray
author_sort Borislav Savkovic
title A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.
title_short A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.
title_full A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.
title_fullStr A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.
title_sort quantitative comparison of anti-hiv gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus cd4+ t cells.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Gene therapy represents an alternative and promising anti-HIV modality to highly active antiretroviral therapy. It involves the introduction of a protective gene into a cell, thereby conferring protection against HIV. While clinical trials to date have delivered gene therapy to CD4+T cells or to CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), the relative benefits of each of these two cellular targets have not been conclusively determined. In the present analysis, we investigated the relative merits of delivering a dual construct (CCR5 entry inhibitor + C46 fusion inhibitor) to either CD4+T cells or to CD34+ HSC. Using mathematical modelling, we determined the impact of each scenario in terms of total CD4+T cell counts over a 10 year period, and also in terms of inhibition of CCR5 and CXCR4 tropic virus. Our modelling determined that therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC generally resulted in better outcomes than delivery to CD4+T cells. An early one-off therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC, assuming that 20% of CD34+ HSC in the bone marrow were gene-modified (G+), resulted in total CD4+T cell counts ≥ 180 cells/ µL in peripheral blood after 10 years. If the uninfected G+ CD4+T cells (in addition to exhibiting lower likelihood of becoming productively infected) also exhibited reduced levels of bystander apoptosis (92.5% reduction) over non gene-modified (G-) CD4+T cells, then total CD4+T cell counts of ≥ 350 cells/ µL were observed after 10 years, even if initially only 10% of CD34+ HSC in the bone marrow received the protective gene. Taken together our results indicate that: 1.) therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC will result in better outcomes than delivery to CD4+T cells, and 2.) a greater impact of gene therapy will be observed if G+ CD4+T cells exhibit reduced levels of bystander apoptosis over G- CD4+T cells.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4063676?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT borislavsavkovic aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT jamesnichols aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT donaldbirkett aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT tanyaapplegate aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT scottledger aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT geoffsymonds aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT johnmmurray aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT borislavsavkovic quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT jamesnichols quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT donaldbirkett quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT tanyaapplegate quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT scottledger quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT geoffsymonds quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
AT johnmmurray quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells
_version_ 1725860549413044224