A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.
Gene therapy represents an alternative and promising anti-HIV modality to highly active antiretroviral therapy. It involves the introduction of a protective gene into a cell, thereby conferring protection against HIV. While clinical trials to date have delivered gene therapy to CD4+T cells or to CD3...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-06-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4063676?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-68e152bdb4fc417e99d5bd16696ae504 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-68e152bdb4fc417e99d5bd16696ae5042020-11-24T21:55:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582014-06-01106e100368110.1371/journal.pcbi.1003681A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells.Borislav SavkovicJames NicholsDonald BirkettTanya ApplegateScott LedgerGeoff SymondsJohn M MurrayGene therapy represents an alternative and promising anti-HIV modality to highly active antiretroviral therapy. It involves the introduction of a protective gene into a cell, thereby conferring protection against HIV. While clinical trials to date have delivered gene therapy to CD4+T cells or to CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), the relative benefits of each of these two cellular targets have not been conclusively determined. In the present analysis, we investigated the relative merits of delivering a dual construct (CCR5 entry inhibitor + C46 fusion inhibitor) to either CD4+T cells or to CD34+ HSC. Using mathematical modelling, we determined the impact of each scenario in terms of total CD4+T cell counts over a 10 year period, and also in terms of inhibition of CCR5 and CXCR4 tropic virus. Our modelling determined that therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC generally resulted in better outcomes than delivery to CD4+T cells. An early one-off therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC, assuming that 20% of CD34+ HSC in the bone marrow were gene-modified (G+), resulted in total CD4+T cell counts ≥ 180 cells/ µL in peripheral blood after 10 years. If the uninfected G+ CD4+T cells (in addition to exhibiting lower likelihood of becoming productively infected) also exhibited reduced levels of bystander apoptosis (92.5% reduction) over non gene-modified (G-) CD4+T cells, then total CD4+T cell counts of ≥ 350 cells/ µL were observed after 10 years, even if initially only 10% of CD34+ HSC in the bone marrow received the protective gene. Taken together our results indicate that: 1.) therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC will result in better outcomes than delivery to CD4+T cells, and 2.) a greater impact of gene therapy will be observed if G+ CD4+T cells exhibit reduced levels of bystander apoptosis over G- CD4+T cells.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4063676?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Borislav Savkovic James Nichols Donald Birkett Tanya Applegate Scott Ledger Geoff Symonds John M Murray |
spellingShingle |
Borislav Savkovic James Nichols Donald Birkett Tanya Applegate Scott Ledger Geoff Symonds John M Murray A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells. PLoS Computational Biology |
author_facet |
Borislav Savkovic James Nichols Donald Birkett Tanya Applegate Scott Ledger Geoff Symonds John M Murray |
author_sort |
Borislav Savkovic |
title |
A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells. |
title_short |
A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells. |
title_full |
A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells. |
title_fullStr |
A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells. |
title_full_unstemmed |
A quantitative comparison of anti-HIV gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus CD4+ T cells. |
title_sort |
quantitative comparison of anti-hiv gene therapy delivered to hematopoietic stem cells versus cd4+ t cells. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS Computational Biology |
issn |
1553-734X 1553-7358 |
publishDate |
2014-06-01 |
description |
Gene therapy represents an alternative and promising anti-HIV modality to highly active antiretroviral therapy. It involves the introduction of a protective gene into a cell, thereby conferring protection against HIV. While clinical trials to date have delivered gene therapy to CD4+T cells or to CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), the relative benefits of each of these two cellular targets have not been conclusively determined. In the present analysis, we investigated the relative merits of delivering a dual construct (CCR5 entry inhibitor + C46 fusion inhibitor) to either CD4+T cells or to CD34+ HSC. Using mathematical modelling, we determined the impact of each scenario in terms of total CD4+T cell counts over a 10 year period, and also in terms of inhibition of CCR5 and CXCR4 tropic virus. Our modelling determined that therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC generally resulted in better outcomes than delivery to CD4+T cells. An early one-off therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC, assuming that 20% of CD34+ HSC in the bone marrow were gene-modified (G+), resulted in total CD4+T cell counts ≥ 180 cells/ µL in peripheral blood after 10 years. If the uninfected G+ CD4+T cells (in addition to exhibiting lower likelihood of becoming productively infected) also exhibited reduced levels of bystander apoptosis (92.5% reduction) over non gene-modified (G-) CD4+T cells, then total CD4+T cell counts of ≥ 350 cells/ µL were observed after 10 years, even if initially only 10% of CD34+ HSC in the bone marrow received the protective gene. Taken together our results indicate that: 1.) therapy delivery to CD34+ HSC will result in better outcomes than delivery to CD4+T cells, and 2.) a greater impact of gene therapy will be observed if G+ CD4+T cells exhibit reduced levels of bystander apoptosis over G- CD4+T cells. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4063676?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT borislavsavkovic aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT jamesnichols aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT donaldbirkett aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT tanyaapplegate aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT scottledger aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT geoffsymonds aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT johnmmurray aquantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT borislavsavkovic quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT jamesnichols quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT donaldbirkett quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT tanyaapplegate quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT scottledger quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT geoffsymonds quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells AT johnmmurray quantitativecomparisonofantihivgenetherapydeliveredtohematopoieticstemcellsversuscd4tcells |
_version_ |
1725860549413044224 |