Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds
Hundreds of trials are being conducted to evaluate combination of newer targeted drugs as well as immunotherapy. Our aim was to compare efficacy and safety of combination versus single non-cytotoxic anticancer agents. We searched PubMed (01/01/2001 to 03/06/2018) (and, for immunotherapy, ASCO and ES...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2020-01-01
|
Series: | OncoImmunology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2019.1710052 |
id |
doaj-68c8fc18a4be4f07990edc45b5242cd0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-68c8fc18a4be4f07990edc45b5242cd02021-09-24T14:41:23ZengTaylor & Francis GroupOncoImmunology2162-402X2020-01-019110.1080/2162402X.2019.17100521710052Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compoundsDenis L. Jardim0Débora De Melo Gagliato1Mina Nikanjam2Donald A. Barkauskas3Razelle Kurzrock4Centro de Oncologia Hospital Sírio LibanêsHospital Beneficência PortuguesaUniversity of CaliforniaKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of CaliforniaHundreds of trials are being conducted to evaluate combination of newer targeted drugs as well as immunotherapy. Our aim was to compare efficacy and safety of combination versus single non-cytotoxic anticancer agents. We searched PubMed (01/01/2001 to 03/06/2018) (and, for immunotherapy, ASCO and ESMO abstracts (2016 through March 2018)) for randomized clinical trials that compared a single non-cytotoxic agent (targeted, hormonal, or immunotherapy) versus a combination with another non-cytotoxic partner. Efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated in a meta-analysis using a linear mixed-effects model (guidelines per PRISMA Report).We included 95 randomized comparisons (single vs. combination non-cytotoxic therapies) (59.4%, phase II; 41.6%, phase III trials) (29,175 patients (solid tumors)). Combinations most frequently included a hormonal agent and a targeted small molecule (23%). Compared to single non-cytotoxic agents, adding another non-cytotoxic drug increased response rate (odds ratio [OR]=1.61, 95%CI 1.40-1.84)and prolonged progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.75, 95%CI 0.69-0.81)and overall survival (HR=0.87, 95%CI 0.81-0.94) (all p<0.001), which was most pronounced for the association between immunotherapy combinations and longer survival. Combinations also significantlyincreased the risk of high-grade toxicities (OR=2.42, 95%CI 1.98-2.97) (most notably for immunotherapy and small molecule inhibitors) and mortality at least possibly therapy related (OR: 1.33, 95%CI 1.15-1.53) (both p<0.001) (absolute mortality = 0.90% (single agent) versus 1.31% (combinations)) compared to single agents. In conclusion, combinations of non-cytotoxic drugs versus monotherapy in randomized cancer clinical trials attenuated safety, but increased efficacy, with the balance tilting in favor of combination therapy, based on the prolongation in survival.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2019.1710052combination therapytargeted therapyimmunotherapyhormonal therapysolid tumors |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Denis L. Jardim Débora De Melo Gagliato Mina Nikanjam Donald A. Barkauskas Razelle Kurzrock |
spellingShingle |
Denis L. Jardim Débora De Melo Gagliato Mina Nikanjam Donald A. Barkauskas Razelle Kurzrock Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds OncoImmunology combination therapy targeted therapy immunotherapy hormonal therapy solid tumors |
author_facet |
Denis L. Jardim Débora De Melo Gagliato Mina Nikanjam Donald A. Barkauskas Razelle Kurzrock |
author_sort |
Denis L. Jardim |
title |
Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds |
title_short |
Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds |
title_full |
Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds |
title_sort |
efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
OncoImmunology |
issn |
2162-402X |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Hundreds of trials are being conducted to evaluate combination of newer targeted drugs as well as immunotherapy. Our aim was to compare efficacy and safety of combination versus single non-cytotoxic anticancer agents. We searched PubMed (01/01/2001 to 03/06/2018) (and, for immunotherapy, ASCO and ESMO abstracts (2016 through March 2018)) for randomized clinical trials that compared a single non-cytotoxic agent (targeted, hormonal, or immunotherapy) versus a combination with another non-cytotoxic partner. Efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated in a meta-analysis using a linear mixed-effects model (guidelines per PRISMA Report).We included 95 randomized comparisons (single vs. combination non-cytotoxic therapies) (59.4%, phase II; 41.6%, phase III trials) (29,175 patients (solid tumors)). Combinations most frequently included a hormonal agent and a targeted small molecule (23%). Compared to single non-cytotoxic agents, adding another non-cytotoxic drug increased response rate (odds ratio [OR]=1.61, 95%CI 1.40-1.84)and prolonged progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.75, 95%CI 0.69-0.81)and overall survival (HR=0.87, 95%CI 0.81-0.94) (all p<0.001), which was most pronounced for the association between immunotherapy combinations and longer survival. Combinations also significantlyincreased the risk of high-grade toxicities (OR=2.42, 95%CI 1.98-2.97) (most notably for immunotherapy and small molecule inhibitors) and mortality at least possibly therapy related (OR: 1.33, 95%CI 1.15-1.53) (both p<0.001) (absolute mortality = 0.90% (single agent) versus 1.31% (combinations)) compared to single agents. In conclusion, combinations of non-cytotoxic drugs versus monotherapy in randomized cancer clinical trials attenuated safety, but increased efficacy, with the balance tilting in favor of combination therapy, based on the prolongation in survival. |
topic |
combination therapy targeted therapy immunotherapy hormonal therapy solid tumors |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2019.1710052 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT denisljardim efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds AT deborademelogagliato efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds AT minanikanjam efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds AT donaldabarkauskas efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds AT razellekurzrock efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds |
_version_ |
1717369752728371200 |