Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds

Hundreds of trials are being conducted to evaluate combination of newer targeted drugs as well as immunotherapy. Our aim was to compare efficacy and safety of combination versus single non-cytotoxic anticancer agents. We searched PubMed (01/01/2001 to 03/06/2018) (and, for immunotherapy, ASCO and ES...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denis L. Jardim, Débora De Melo Gagliato, Mina Nikanjam, Donald A. Barkauskas, Razelle Kurzrock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:OncoImmunology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2019.1710052
id doaj-68c8fc18a4be4f07990edc45b5242cd0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68c8fc18a4be4f07990edc45b5242cd02021-09-24T14:41:23ZengTaylor & Francis GroupOncoImmunology2162-402X2020-01-019110.1080/2162402X.2019.17100521710052Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compoundsDenis L. Jardim0Débora De Melo Gagliato1Mina Nikanjam2Donald A. Barkauskas3Razelle Kurzrock4Centro de Oncologia Hospital Sírio LibanêsHospital Beneficência PortuguesaUniversity of CaliforniaKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of CaliforniaHundreds of trials are being conducted to evaluate combination of newer targeted drugs as well as immunotherapy. Our aim was to compare efficacy and safety of combination versus single non-cytotoxic anticancer agents. We searched PubMed (01/01/2001 to 03/06/2018) (and, for immunotherapy, ASCO and ESMO abstracts (2016 through March 2018)) for randomized clinical trials that compared a single non-cytotoxic agent (targeted, hormonal, or immunotherapy) versus a combination with another non-cytotoxic partner. Efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated in a meta-analysis using a linear mixed-effects model (guidelines per PRISMA Report).We included 95 randomized comparisons (single vs. combination non-cytotoxic therapies) (59.4%, phase II; 41.6%, phase III trials) (29,175 patients (solid tumors)). Combinations most frequently included a hormonal agent and a targeted small molecule (23%). Compared to single non-cytotoxic agents, adding another non-cytotoxic drug increased response rate (odds ratio [OR]=1.61, 95%CI 1.40-1.84)and prolonged progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.75, 95%CI 0.69-0.81)and overall survival (HR=0.87, 95%CI 0.81-0.94) (all p<0.001), which was most pronounced for the association between immunotherapy combinations and longer survival. Combinations also significantlyincreased the risk of high-grade toxicities (OR=2.42, 95%CI 1.98-2.97) (most notably for immunotherapy and small molecule inhibitors) and mortality at least possibly therapy related (OR: 1.33, 95%CI 1.15-1.53) (both p<0.001) (absolute mortality = 0.90% (single agent) versus 1.31% (combinations)) compared to single agents. In conclusion, combinations of non-cytotoxic drugs versus monotherapy in randomized cancer clinical trials attenuated safety, but increased efficacy, with the balance tilting in favor of combination therapy, based on the prolongation in survival.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2019.1710052combination therapytargeted therapyimmunotherapyhormonal therapysolid tumors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denis L. Jardim
Débora De Melo Gagliato
Mina Nikanjam
Donald A. Barkauskas
Razelle Kurzrock
spellingShingle Denis L. Jardim
Débora De Melo Gagliato
Mina Nikanjam
Donald A. Barkauskas
Razelle Kurzrock
Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds
OncoImmunology
combination therapy
targeted therapy
immunotherapy
hormonal therapy
solid tumors
author_facet Denis L. Jardim
Débora De Melo Gagliato
Mina Nikanjam
Donald A. Barkauskas
Razelle Kurzrock
author_sort Denis L. Jardim
title Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds
title_short Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds
title_full Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds
title_sort efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series OncoImmunology
issn 2162-402X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Hundreds of trials are being conducted to evaluate combination of newer targeted drugs as well as immunotherapy. Our aim was to compare efficacy and safety of combination versus single non-cytotoxic anticancer agents. We searched PubMed (01/01/2001 to 03/06/2018) (and, for immunotherapy, ASCO and ESMO abstracts (2016 through March 2018)) for randomized clinical trials that compared a single non-cytotoxic agent (targeted, hormonal, or immunotherapy) versus a combination with another non-cytotoxic partner. Efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated in a meta-analysis using a linear mixed-effects model (guidelines per PRISMA Report).We included 95 randomized comparisons (single vs. combination non-cytotoxic therapies) (59.4%, phase II; 41.6%, phase III trials) (29,175 patients (solid tumors)). Combinations most frequently included a hormonal agent and a targeted small molecule (23%). Compared to single non-cytotoxic agents, adding another non-cytotoxic drug increased response rate (odds ratio [OR]=1.61, 95%CI 1.40-1.84)and prolonged progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.75, 95%CI 0.69-0.81)and overall survival (HR=0.87, 95%CI 0.81-0.94) (all p<0.001), which was most pronounced for the association between immunotherapy combinations and longer survival. Combinations also significantlyincreased the risk of high-grade toxicities (OR=2.42, 95%CI 1.98-2.97) (most notably for immunotherapy and small molecule inhibitors) and mortality at least possibly therapy related (OR: 1.33, 95%CI 1.15-1.53) (both p<0.001) (absolute mortality = 0.90% (single agent) versus 1.31% (combinations)) compared to single agents. In conclusion, combinations of non-cytotoxic drugs versus monotherapy in randomized cancer clinical trials attenuated safety, but increased efficacy, with the balance tilting in favor of combination therapy, based on the prolongation in survival.
topic combination therapy
targeted therapy
immunotherapy
hormonal therapy
solid tumors
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2019.1710052
work_keys_str_mv AT denisljardim efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds
AT deborademelogagliato efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds
AT minanikanjam efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds
AT donaldabarkauskas efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds
AT razellekurzrock efficacyandsafetyofanticancerdrugcombinationsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithafocusonimmunotherapeuticsandgenetargetedcompounds
_version_ 1717369752728371200