Biogeography of Parasitic Nematode Communities in the Galápagos Giant Tortoise: Implications for Conservation Management.
The Galápagos giant tortoise is an icon of the unique, endemic biodiversity of Galápagos, but little is known of its parasitic fauna. We assessed the diversity of parasitic nematode communities and their spatial distributions within four wild tortoise populations comprising three species across thre...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135684 |
id |
doaj-68c269a72c214f3391321f6d42159510 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-68c269a72c214f3391321f6d421595102021-03-03T19:59:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01109e013568410.1371/journal.pone.0135684Biogeography of Parasitic Nematode Communities in the Galápagos Giant Tortoise: Implications for Conservation Management.Guillaume FourniéSimon J GoodmanMarilyn CruzVirna CedeñoAlberto VélezLeandro PatiñoCaroline MillinsLynda M GibbonsMark T FoxAndrew A CunninghamThe Galápagos giant tortoise is an icon of the unique, endemic biodiversity of Galápagos, but little is known of its parasitic fauna. We assessed the diversity of parasitic nematode communities and their spatial distributions within four wild tortoise populations comprising three species across three Galápagos islands, and consider their implication for Galápagos tortoise conservation programmes. Coprological examinations revealed nematode eggs to be common, with more than 80% of tortoises infected within each wild population. Faecal samples from tortoises within captive breeding centres on Santa Cruz, Isabela and San Cristobal islands also were examined. Five different nematode egg types were identified: oxyuroid, ascarid, trichurid and two types of strongyle. Sequencing of the 18S small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene from adult nematodes passed with faeces identified novel sequences indicative of rhabditid and ascaridid species. In the wild, the composition of nematode communities varied according to tortoise species, which co-varied with island, but nematode diversity and abundance were reduced or altered in captive-reared animals. Evolutionary and ecological factors are likely responsible for the variation in nematode distributions in the wild. This possible species/island-parasite co-evolution has not been considered previously for Galápagos tortoises. We recommend that conservation efforts, such as the current Galápagos tortoise captive breeding/rearing and release programme, be managed with respect to parasite biogeography and host-parasite co-evolutionary processes in addition to the biogeography of the host.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135684 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Guillaume Fournié Simon J Goodman Marilyn Cruz Virna Cedeño Alberto Vélez Leandro Patiño Caroline Millins Lynda M Gibbons Mark T Fox Andrew A Cunningham |
spellingShingle |
Guillaume Fournié Simon J Goodman Marilyn Cruz Virna Cedeño Alberto Vélez Leandro Patiño Caroline Millins Lynda M Gibbons Mark T Fox Andrew A Cunningham Biogeography of Parasitic Nematode Communities in the Galápagos Giant Tortoise: Implications for Conservation Management. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Guillaume Fournié Simon J Goodman Marilyn Cruz Virna Cedeño Alberto Vélez Leandro Patiño Caroline Millins Lynda M Gibbons Mark T Fox Andrew A Cunningham |
author_sort |
Guillaume Fournié |
title |
Biogeography of Parasitic Nematode Communities in the Galápagos Giant Tortoise: Implications for Conservation Management. |
title_short |
Biogeography of Parasitic Nematode Communities in the Galápagos Giant Tortoise: Implications for Conservation Management. |
title_full |
Biogeography of Parasitic Nematode Communities in the Galápagos Giant Tortoise: Implications for Conservation Management. |
title_fullStr |
Biogeography of Parasitic Nematode Communities in the Galápagos Giant Tortoise: Implications for Conservation Management. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biogeography of Parasitic Nematode Communities in the Galápagos Giant Tortoise: Implications for Conservation Management. |
title_sort |
biogeography of parasitic nematode communities in the galápagos giant tortoise: implications for conservation management. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
The Galápagos giant tortoise is an icon of the unique, endemic biodiversity of Galápagos, but little is known of its parasitic fauna. We assessed the diversity of parasitic nematode communities and their spatial distributions within four wild tortoise populations comprising three species across three Galápagos islands, and consider their implication for Galápagos tortoise conservation programmes. Coprological examinations revealed nematode eggs to be common, with more than 80% of tortoises infected within each wild population. Faecal samples from tortoises within captive breeding centres on Santa Cruz, Isabela and San Cristobal islands also were examined. Five different nematode egg types were identified: oxyuroid, ascarid, trichurid and two types of strongyle. Sequencing of the 18S small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene from adult nematodes passed with faeces identified novel sequences indicative of rhabditid and ascaridid species. In the wild, the composition of nematode communities varied according to tortoise species, which co-varied with island, but nematode diversity and abundance were reduced or altered in captive-reared animals. Evolutionary and ecological factors are likely responsible for the variation in nematode distributions in the wild. This possible species/island-parasite co-evolution has not been considered previously for Galápagos tortoises. We recommend that conservation efforts, such as the current Galápagos tortoise captive breeding/rearing and release programme, be managed with respect to parasite biogeography and host-parasite co-evolutionary processes in addition to the biogeography of the host. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135684 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guillaumefournie biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT simonjgoodman biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT marilyncruz biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT virnacedeno biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT albertovelez biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT leandropatino biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT carolinemillins biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT lyndamgibbons biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT marktfox biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement AT andrewacunningham biogeographyofparasiticnematodecommunitiesinthegalapagosgianttortoiseimplicationsforconservationmanagement |
_version_ |
1714824697853509632 |