Comparison of Classical Cytogenetics Versus Interphase FISH in Diagnosis of Mosaic Form of Turner Syndrome

Background:Mosaic form of turner syndrome that represented by two or more  cell lines in an affected individual, often has limitation for detection with classical  cytogenetic methods. The present study was carried out to compare the efficiency of  interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shohreh Shargh, Simin Tagavi, Seyed Mojtaba Mohaddes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2010-11-01
Series:Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mjiri.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-114&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-68bd5217f4ab4c03ab3dd1ae2e6ff48a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68bd5217f4ab4c03ab3dd1ae2e6ff48a2020-11-24T21:01:41ZengIran University of Medical SciencesMedical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran1016-14302251-68402010-11-01243121125Comparison of Classical Cytogenetics Versus Interphase FISH in Diagnosis of Mosaic Form of Turner SyndromeShohreh SharghSimin TagaviSeyed Mojtaba MohaddesBackground:Mosaic form of turner syndrome that represented by two or more  cell lines in an affected individual, often has limitation for detection with classical  cytogenetic methods. The present study was carried out to compare the efficiency of  interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) and cytogenetic techniques in  detection of mosaic form of turner syndrome.  Methods: All candidate samples for turner syndrome were surveyed with both interphase FISH using DXZ1 as a chromosome X specific probe and the GTG- banding methods. The chi square test was used and a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered as being significant.  Results: Asignificant difference was observed between results obtained from the  application of the two methods under study (P<0.05), indicating that the interphase  FISH is favourably compares to conventional cytogenetics in detection of mosaic  form of X chromosome aneuploidy, as an extended number of cells can be scored in a  limited time.  Conclusion: The results indicate that using the two techniques in parallel allow accurate differentiation between mosaicism and homogenous aneuploidy of X chromosome, and thus both numerical and structural aberrations of the X will be analyzed. http://mjiri.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-114&slc_lang=en&sid=1Turner syndromeMosaicismFISHClasical Cytogenetics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shohreh Shargh
Simin Tagavi
Seyed Mojtaba Mohaddes
spellingShingle Shohreh Shargh
Simin Tagavi
Seyed Mojtaba Mohaddes
Comparison of Classical Cytogenetics Versus Interphase FISH in Diagnosis of Mosaic Form of Turner Syndrome
Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
Turner syndrome
Mosaicism
FISH
Clasical Cytogenetics
author_facet Shohreh Shargh
Simin Tagavi
Seyed Mojtaba Mohaddes
author_sort Shohreh Shargh
title Comparison of Classical Cytogenetics Versus Interphase FISH in Diagnosis of Mosaic Form of Turner Syndrome
title_short Comparison of Classical Cytogenetics Versus Interphase FISH in Diagnosis of Mosaic Form of Turner Syndrome
title_full Comparison of Classical Cytogenetics Versus Interphase FISH in Diagnosis of Mosaic Form of Turner Syndrome
title_fullStr Comparison of Classical Cytogenetics Versus Interphase FISH in Diagnosis of Mosaic Form of Turner Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Classical Cytogenetics Versus Interphase FISH in Diagnosis of Mosaic Form of Turner Syndrome
title_sort comparison of classical cytogenetics versus interphase fish in diagnosis of mosaic form of turner syndrome
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
issn 1016-1430
2251-6840
publishDate 2010-11-01
description Background:Mosaic form of turner syndrome that represented by two or more  cell lines in an affected individual, often has limitation for detection with classical  cytogenetic methods. The present study was carried out to compare the efficiency of  interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) and cytogenetic techniques in  detection of mosaic form of turner syndrome.  Methods: All candidate samples for turner syndrome were surveyed with both interphase FISH using DXZ1 as a chromosome X specific probe and the GTG- banding methods. The chi square test was used and a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered as being significant.  Results: Asignificant difference was observed between results obtained from the  application of the two methods under study (P<0.05), indicating that the interphase  FISH is favourably compares to conventional cytogenetics in detection of mosaic  form of X chromosome aneuploidy, as an extended number of cells can be scored in a  limited time.  Conclusion: The results indicate that using the two techniques in parallel allow accurate differentiation between mosaicism and homogenous aneuploidy of X chromosome, and thus both numerical and structural aberrations of the X will be analyzed.
topic Turner syndrome
Mosaicism
FISH
Clasical Cytogenetics
url http://mjiri.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-114&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT shohrehshargh comparisonofclassicalcytogeneticsversusinterphasefishindiagnosisofmosaicformofturnersyndrome
AT simintagavi comparisonofclassicalcytogeneticsversusinterphasefishindiagnosisofmosaicformofturnersyndrome
AT seyedmojtabamohaddes comparisonofclassicalcytogeneticsversusinterphasefishindiagnosisofmosaicformofturnersyndrome
_version_ 1716777231765733376