Electricity Self-Sufficient Community Clustering for Energy Resilience
Local electricity generation and sharing has been given considerable attention recently for its disaster resilience and other reasons. However, the process of designing local sharing communities (or local grids) is still unclear. Thus, this study empirically compares algorithms for electricity shari...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/7/543 |
id |
doaj-68923c012ff647bf8875c25675238ee9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-68923c012ff647bf8875c25675238ee92020-11-24T23:28:49ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732016-07-019754310.3390/en9070543en9070543Electricity Self-Sufficient Community Clustering for Energy ResilienceYoshiki Yamagata0Daisuke Murakami1Kazuhiro Minami2Nana Arizumi3Sho Kuroda4Tomoya Tanjo5Hiroshi Maruyama6Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, JapanCenter for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, JapanDepartment of Statistical Modeling, Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8562, JapanCenter for Semiconductor Research and Development, Toshiba Corporation, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 212-8520, JapanGraduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573, JapanCenter for Cloud Research and Development, National Institute of Informatics, Chiyoda, Tokyo 100-0003, JapanChief Strategy Officer, Preferred Networks, Inc., Chiyoda, Tokyo 100-0004, JapanLocal electricity generation and sharing has been given considerable attention recently for its disaster resilience and other reasons. However, the process of designing local sharing communities (or local grids) is still unclear. Thus, this study empirically compares algorithms for electricity sharing community clustering in terms of self-sufficiency, sharing cost, and stability. The comparison is performed for all 12 months of a typical year in Yokohama, Japan. The analysis results indicate that, while each individual algorithm has some advantages, an exhaustive algorithm provides clusters that are highly self-sufficient. The exhaustive algorithm further demonstrates that a clustering result optimized for one month is available across many months without losing self-sufficiency. In fact, the clusters achieve complete self-sufficiency for five months in spring and autumn, when electricity demands are lower.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/7/543electricity sharingcommunity clusteringvehicle to community systemgraph partitioningsimulated annealing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yoshiki Yamagata Daisuke Murakami Kazuhiro Minami Nana Arizumi Sho Kuroda Tomoya Tanjo Hiroshi Maruyama |
spellingShingle |
Yoshiki Yamagata Daisuke Murakami Kazuhiro Minami Nana Arizumi Sho Kuroda Tomoya Tanjo Hiroshi Maruyama Electricity Self-Sufficient Community Clustering for Energy Resilience Energies electricity sharing community clustering vehicle to community system graph partitioning simulated annealing |
author_facet |
Yoshiki Yamagata Daisuke Murakami Kazuhiro Minami Nana Arizumi Sho Kuroda Tomoya Tanjo Hiroshi Maruyama |
author_sort |
Yoshiki Yamagata |
title |
Electricity Self-Sufficient Community Clustering for Energy Resilience |
title_short |
Electricity Self-Sufficient Community Clustering for Energy Resilience |
title_full |
Electricity Self-Sufficient Community Clustering for Energy Resilience |
title_fullStr |
Electricity Self-Sufficient Community Clustering for Energy Resilience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Electricity Self-Sufficient Community Clustering for Energy Resilience |
title_sort |
electricity self-sufficient community clustering for energy resilience |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2016-07-01 |
description |
Local electricity generation and sharing has been given considerable attention recently for its disaster resilience and other reasons. However, the process of designing local sharing communities (or local grids) is still unclear. Thus, this study empirically compares algorithms for electricity sharing community clustering in terms of self-sufficiency, sharing cost, and stability. The comparison is performed for all 12 months of a typical year in Yokohama, Japan. The analysis results indicate that, while each individual algorithm has some advantages, an exhaustive algorithm provides clusters that are highly self-sufficient. The exhaustive algorithm further demonstrates that a clustering result optimized for one month is available across many months without losing self-sufficiency. In fact, the clusters achieve complete self-sufficiency for five months in spring and autumn, when electricity demands are lower. |
topic |
electricity sharing community clustering vehicle to community system graph partitioning simulated annealing |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/7/543 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yoshikiyamagata electricityselfsufficientcommunityclusteringforenergyresilience AT daisukemurakami electricityselfsufficientcommunityclusteringforenergyresilience AT kazuhirominami electricityselfsufficientcommunityclusteringforenergyresilience AT nanaarizumi electricityselfsufficientcommunityclusteringforenergyresilience AT shokuroda electricityselfsufficientcommunityclusteringforenergyresilience AT tomoyatanjo electricityselfsufficientcommunityclusteringforenergyresilience AT hiroshimaruyama electricityselfsufficientcommunityclusteringforenergyresilience |
_version_ |
1725547865478004736 |