How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?
When someone holds a door for us we often respond with a verbal ``thanks.'' But given such a trivial favor, our feelings can vary considerably depending on how the door is held. Studies have shown that verbal thanking increases in relation to door-holding effort. However, it is unclear ho...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737/full |
id |
doaj-6887e655291246e09e3bb46042f97b3d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6887e655291246e09e3bb46042f97b3d2020-11-24T20:52:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-11-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737138752How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?Glenn Ryan Fox0Helder eAraujo1Michael eMetke2Chris eShafer3Antonio eDamasio4University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaWhen someone holds a door for us we often respond with a verbal ``thanks.'' But given such a trivial favor, our feelings can vary considerably depending on how the door is held. Studies have shown that verbal thanking increases in relation to door-holding effort. However, it is unclear how such a favor can lead to verbal thanks in addition to reciprocal help. We examined how holding a door in an effortful or non-effortful manner relates to verbal thanking and reciprocal helping. We measured: (1) whether participants verbally thanked the experimenter, (2) whether they agreed to help another person by taking a survey, and (3) whether they helped pick up objects (pens) that the door-holder subsequently dropped. Participants in the effortful condition were more likely to offer verbal thanks, to help pick up the pens, and to walk a greater distance to pick them up. Participants who thanked the door-holder, however, were not more likely to provide help.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737/fullSocial Behaviorsocial cognitioncooperationsocial influenceInterpersonal interaction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Glenn Ryan Fox Helder eAraujo Michael eMetke Chris eShafer Antonio eDamasio |
spellingShingle |
Glenn Ryan Fox Helder eAraujo Michael eMetke Chris eShafer Antonio eDamasio How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help? Frontiers in Psychology Social Behavior social cognition cooperation social influence Interpersonal interaction |
author_facet |
Glenn Ryan Fox Helder eAraujo Michael eMetke Chris eShafer Antonio eDamasio |
author_sort |
Glenn Ryan Fox |
title |
How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help? |
title_short |
How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help? |
title_full |
How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help? |
title_fullStr |
How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help? |
title_sort |
how does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help? |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2015-11-01 |
description |
When someone holds a door for us we often respond with a verbal ``thanks.'' But given such a trivial favor, our feelings can vary considerably depending on how the door is held. Studies have shown that verbal thanking increases in relation to door-holding effort. However, it is unclear how such a favor can lead to verbal thanks in addition to reciprocal help. We examined how holding a door in an effortful or non-effortful manner relates to verbal thanking and reciprocal helping. We measured: (1) whether participants verbally thanked the experimenter, (2) whether they agreed to help another person by taking a survey, and (3) whether they helped pick up objects (pens) that the door-holder subsequently dropped. Participants in the effortful condition were more likely to offer verbal thanks, to help pick up the pens, and to walk a greater distance to pick them up. Participants who thanked the door-holder, however, were not more likely to provide help. |
topic |
Social Behavior social cognition cooperation social influence Interpersonal interaction |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT glennryanfox howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp AT helderearaujo howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp AT michaelemetke howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp AT chriseshafer howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp AT antonioedamasio howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp |
_version_ |
1716799553503494144 |