How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?

When someone holds a door for us we often respond with a verbal ``thanks.'' But given such a trivial favor, our feelings can vary considerably depending on how the door is held. Studies have shown that verbal thanking increases in relation to door-holding effort. However, it is unclear ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glenn Ryan Fox, Helder eAraujo, Michael eMetke, Chris eShafer, Antonio eDamasio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737/full
id doaj-6887e655291246e09e3bb46042f97b3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6887e655291246e09e3bb46042f97b3d2020-11-24T20:52:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-11-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737138752How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?Glenn Ryan Fox0Helder eAraujo1Michael eMetke2Chris eShafer3Antonio eDamasio4University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaWhen someone holds a door for us we often respond with a verbal ``thanks.'' But given such a trivial favor, our feelings can vary considerably depending on how the door is held. Studies have shown that verbal thanking increases in relation to door-holding effort. However, it is unclear how such a favor can lead to verbal thanks in addition to reciprocal help. We examined how holding a door in an effortful or non-effortful manner relates to verbal thanking and reciprocal helping. We measured: (1) whether participants verbally thanked the experimenter, (2) whether they agreed to help another person by taking a survey, and (3) whether they helped pick up objects (pens) that the door-holder subsequently dropped. Participants in the effortful condition were more likely to offer verbal thanks, to help pick up the pens, and to walk a greater distance to pick them up. Participants who thanked the door-holder, however, were not more likely to provide help.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737/fullSocial Behaviorsocial cognitioncooperationsocial influenceInterpersonal interaction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Glenn Ryan Fox
Helder eAraujo
Michael eMetke
Chris eShafer
Antonio eDamasio
spellingShingle Glenn Ryan Fox
Helder eAraujo
Michael eMetke
Chris eShafer
Antonio eDamasio
How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?
Frontiers in Psychology
Social Behavior
social cognition
cooperation
social influence
Interpersonal interaction
author_facet Glenn Ryan Fox
Helder eAraujo
Michael eMetke
Chris eShafer
Antonio eDamasio
author_sort Glenn Ryan Fox
title How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?
title_short How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?
title_full How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?
title_fullStr How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?
title_full_unstemmed How does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?
title_sort how does the effort spent to hold a door affect verbal thanks and reciprocal help?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-11-01
description When someone holds a door for us we often respond with a verbal ``thanks.'' But given such a trivial favor, our feelings can vary considerably depending on how the door is held. Studies have shown that verbal thanking increases in relation to door-holding effort. However, it is unclear how such a favor can lead to verbal thanks in addition to reciprocal help. We examined how holding a door in an effortful or non-effortful manner relates to verbal thanking and reciprocal helping. We measured: (1) whether participants verbally thanked the experimenter, (2) whether they agreed to help another person by taking a survey, and (3) whether they helped pick up objects (pens) that the door-holder subsequently dropped. Participants in the effortful condition were more likely to offer verbal thanks, to help pick up the pens, and to walk a greater distance to pick them up. Participants who thanked the door-holder, however, were not more likely to provide help.
topic Social Behavior
social cognition
cooperation
social influence
Interpersonal interaction
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737/full
work_keys_str_mv AT glennryanfox howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp
AT helderearaujo howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp
AT michaelemetke howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp
AT chriseshafer howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp
AT antonioedamasio howdoestheeffortspenttoholdadooraffectverbalthanksandreciprocalhelp
_version_ 1716799553503494144