The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients
Background: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X21989868 |
id |
doaj-686194c42f894fa8acc5d58b0a7cf054 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-686194c42f894fa8acc5d58b0a7cf0542021-07-14T12:04:17ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease1759-72182021-02-011310.1177/1759720X21989868The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patientsBogdan KolarzMarek CieslaAnn K. RosenthalMagdalena DryglewskaMaria MajdanBackground: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative, rationalizing the need for new serologic markers for RA. Antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) and against peptidyl-arginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4) have been postulated to be useful RA markers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 in a well-characterized population of RA patients and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: A total of 122 RA patients and 30 HCs were enrolled in the study. Serum levels of ACPA, anti-PAD4, anti-CarP and RF were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent immunoassays (ELISAs). Synthetic carbamylated peptides were used in the ELISA assay to determine the protein targets of the anti-CarP antibodies. Results: Rates of ACPA, RF, anti-PAD4 and anti-CarP positivity were 85.2%, 67.2%, 55.7% and 46.7% in RA, and 0%, 0%, 6.7% and 6.7% in HC respectively. In the RA population, 25.4% of patients had all four types of antibodies positive, while 6.6% had no antibodies. There was a significant correlation between anti-PAD4 and ACPAs ( r s = 0.39), RF and ACPAs, ( r s = 0.3) and RF and anti-CarP, ( r s = 0.3). There was no correlation between ACPAs and anti-CarP. Anti-CarP positivity was noted in 49 (47.1%) and 45 (54.9%) of ACPAs and RF positive patients respectively. In addition, five anti-CarP+ patients did not have ACPA nor RF. Conclusion: Anti-CarP but not anti-PAD4 may be a useful biomarker in identifying ACPA/RF negative RA patients. This antibody may identify an additional RA population who may benefit from early implementation of aggressive therapy.https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X21989868 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bogdan Kolarz Marek Ciesla Ann K. Rosenthal Magdalena Dryglewska Maria Majdan |
spellingShingle |
Bogdan Kolarz Marek Ciesla Ann K. Rosenthal Magdalena Dryglewska Maria Majdan The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease |
author_facet |
Bogdan Kolarz Marek Ciesla Ann K. Rosenthal Magdalena Dryglewska Maria Majdan |
author_sort |
Bogdan Kolarz |
title |
The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients |
title_short |
The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients |
title_full |
The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients |
title_fullStr |
The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients |
title_sort |
value of anti-carp and anti-pad4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in acpa/rf negative rheumatoid arthritis patients |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease |
issn |
1759-7218 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Background: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative, rationalizing the need for new serologic markers for RA. Antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) and against peptidyl-arginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4) have been postulated to be useful RA markers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 in a well-characterized population of RA patients and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: A total of 122 RA patients and 30 HCs were enrolled in the study. Serum levels of ACPA, anti-PAD4, anti-CarP and RF were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent immunoassays (ELISAs). Synthetic carbamylated peptides were used in the ELISA assay to determine the protein targets of the anti-CarP antibodies. Results: Rates of ACPA, RF, anti-PAD4 and anti-CarP positivity were 85.2%, 67.2%, 55.7% and 46.7% in RA, and 0%, 0%, 6.7% and 6.7% in HC respectively. In the RA population, 25.4% of patients had all four types of antibodies positive, while 6.6% had no antibodies. There was a significant correlation between anti-PAD4 and ACPAs ( r s = 0.39), RF and ACPAs, ( r s = 0.3) and RF and anti-CarP, ( r s = 0.3). There was no correlation between ACPAs and anti-CarP. Anti-CarP positivity was noted in 49 (47.1%) and 45 (54.9%) of ACPAs and RF positive patients respectively. In addition, five anti-CarP+ patients did not have ACPA nor RF. Conclusion: Anti-CarP but not anti-PAD4 may be a useful biomarker in identifying ACPA/RF negative RA patients. This antibody may identify an additional RA population who may benefit from early implementation of aggressive therapy. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X21989868 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bogdankolarz thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT marekciesla thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT annkrosenthal thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT magdalenadryglewska thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT mariamajdan thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT bogdankolarz valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT marekciesla valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT annkrosenthal valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT magdalenadryglewska valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients AT mariamajdan valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients |
_version_ |
1721303014038306816 |