The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients

Background: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bogdan Kolarz, Marek Ciesla, Ann K. Rosenthal, Magdalena Dryglewska, Maria Majdan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-02-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X21989868
id doaj-686194c42f894fa8acc5d58b0a7cf054
record_format Article
spelling doaj-686194c42f894fa8acc5d58b0a7cf0542021-07-14T12:04:17ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease1759-72182021-02-011310.1177/1759720X21989868The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patientsBogdan KolarzMarek CieslaAnn K. RosenthalMagdalena DryglewskaMaria MajdanBackground: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative, rationalizing the need for new serologic markers for RA. Antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) and against peptidyl-arginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4) have been postulated to be useful RA markers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 in a well-characterized population of RA patients and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: A total of 122 RA patients and 30 HCs were enrolled in the study. Serum levels of ACPA, anti-PAD4, anti-CarP and RF were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent immunoassays (ELISAs). Synthetic carbamylated peptides were used in the ELISA assay to determine the protein targets of the anti-CarP antibodies. Results: Rates of ACPA, RF, anti-PAD4 and anti-CarP positivity were 85.2%, 67.2%, 55.7% and 46.7% in RA, and 0%, 0%, 6.7% and 6.7% in HC respectively. In the RA population, 25.4% of patients had all four types of antibodies positive, while 6.6% had no antibodies. There was a significant correlation between anti-PAD4 and ACPAs ( r s  = 0.39), RF and ACPAs, ( r s  = 0.3) and RF and anti-CarP, ( r s  = 0.3). There was no correlation between ACPAs and anti-CarP. Anti-CarP positivity was noted in 49 (47.1%) and 45 (54.9%) of ACPAs and RF positive patients respectively. In addition, five anti-CarP+ patients did not have ACPA nor RF. Conclusion: Anti-CarP but not anti-PAD4 may be a useful biomarker in identifying ACPA/RF negative RA patients. This antibody may identify an additional RA population who may benefit from early implementation of aggressive therapy.https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X21989868
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bogdan Kolarz
Marek Ciesla
Ann K. Rosenthal
Magdalena Dryglewska
Maria Majdan
spellingShingle Bogdan Kolarz
Marek Ciesla
Ann K. Rosenthal
Magdalena Dryglewska
Maria Majdan
The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
author_facet Bogdan Kolarz
Marek Ciesla
Ann K. Rosenthal
Magdalena Dryglewska
Maria Majdan
author_sort Bogdan Kolarz
title The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_short The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_full The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_fullStr The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_full_unstemmed The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_sort value of anti-carp and anti-pad4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in acpa/rf negative rheumatoid arthritis patients
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
issn 1759-7218
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Background: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative, rationalizing the need for new serologic markers for RA. Antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) and against peptidyl-arginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4) have been postulated to be useful RA markers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 in a well-characterized population of RA patients and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: A total of 122 RA patients and 30 HCs were enrolled in the study. Serum levels of ACPA, anti-PAD4, anti-CarP and RF were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent immunoassays (ELISAs). Synthetic carbamylated peptides were used in the ELISA assay to determine the protein targets of the anti-CarP antibodies. Results: Rates of ACPA, RF, anti-PAD4 and anti-CarP positivity were 85.2%, 67.2%, 55.7% and 46.7% in RA, and 0%, 0%, 6.7% and 6.7% in HC respectively. In the RA population, 25.4% of patients had all four types of antibodies positive, while 6.6% had no antibodies. There was a significant correlation between anti-PAD4 and ACPAs ( r s  = 0.39), RF and ACPAs, ( r s  = 0.3) and RF and anti-CarP, ( r s  = 0.3). There was no correlation between ACPAs and anti-CarP. Anti-CarP positivity was noted in 49 (47.1%) and 45 (54.9%) of ACPAs and RF positive patients respectively. In addition, five anti-CarP+ patients did not have ACPA nor RF. Conclusion: Anti-CarP but not anti-PAD4 may be a useful biomarker in identifying ACPA/RF negative RA patients. This antibody may identify an additional RA population who may benefit from early implementation of aggressive therapy.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X21989868
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdankolarz thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT marekciesla thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT annkrosenthal thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT magdalenadryglewska thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT mariamajdan thevalueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT bogdankolarz valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT marekciesla valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT annkrosenthal valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT magdalenadryglewska valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
AT mariamajdan valueofanticarpandantipad4asmarkersofrheumatoidarthritisinacparfnegativerheumatoidarthritispatients
_version_ 1721303014038306816