Publication rates in animal research. Extent and characteristics of published and non-published animal studies followed up at two German university medical centres.
Non-publication and publication bias in animal research is a core topic in current debates on the "reproducibility crisis" and "failure rates in clinical research". To date, however, we lack reliable evidence on the extent of non-publication in animal research. We collected a ran...
Main Authors: | Susanne Wieschowski, Svenja Biernot, Susanne Deutsch, Silke Glage, André Bleich, René Tolba, Daniel Strech |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223758 |
Similar Items
-
Web-based survey among animal researchers on publication practices and incentives for increasing publication rates.
by: Susanne Deutsch, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Attitudes towards animal study registries and their characteristics: An online survey of three cohorts of animal researchers.
by: Susanne Wieschowski, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Animal Study Registries: Results from a Stakeholder Analysis on Potential Strengths, Weaknesses, Facilitators, and Barriers.
by: Susanne Wieschowski, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Publishing Literacy for Researchers
by: Susanne Mikki, et al.
Published: (2010-09-01) -
Development history and publishing experiences of the Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
by: Changhua Lai, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)