Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling
Background: Topical anaesthetics are effective for patients undergoing superficial dermatological and laser procedures. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and patient preference of three commonly used topical anaesthetics: (2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream (EMLA ® ), 4% tetracaine gel (Am...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2015;volume=8;issue=3;spage=143;epage=146;aulast=Chiang |
id |
doaj-6839568189024af796f8745e9f9578a9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6839568189024af796f8745e9f9578a92020-11-24T20:52:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 0974-20772015-01-018314314610.4103/0974-2077.167270Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedlingYi Zhen ChiangFiras Al-NiaimiVishal MadanBackground: Topical anaesthetics are effective for patients undergoing superficial dermatological and laser procedures. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and patient preference of three commonly used topical anaesthetics: (2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream (EMLA ® ), 4% tetracaine gel (Ametop TM ) and 4% liposomal lidocaine gel (LMX4 ® )) in patients undergoing laser procedures and skin microneedling. Settings and Design: This was a prospective, double-blind study of patients undergoing laser and skin microneedling procedures at a laser unit in a tertiary referral dermatology centre. Materials and Methods: All 29 patients had three topical anaesthetics applied under occlusion for 1 hour prior to the procedure, at different treatment sites within the same anatomical zone. A self-assessment numerical pain rating scale was given to each patient to rate the pain during the procedure and each patient was asked to specify their preferred choice of topical anaesthetic at the end of the procedure. Statistical Analysis: Parametric data (mean pain scores and frequency of topical anaesthetic agent of choice) were compared using the paired samples t-test. A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results and Conclusions: Patients reported a mean (±SD; 95% confidence interval) pain score of 5 (±2.58; 3.66-6.46) with Ametop TM , 4.38 (±2.53; 2.64-4.89) with EMLA ® and 3.91 (±1.95; 2.65-4.76) with LMX4 ® . There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between the different topical anaesthetics. The majority of patients preferred LMX4 ® as their choice of topical anaesthetic for dermatological laser and skin microneedling procedures.http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2015;volume=8;issue=3;spage=143;epage=146;aulast=ChiangTopical anaesthetics2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine creamtetracaine gelliposomal lidocaine gelLaserskin microneedling |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yi Zhen Chiang Firas Al-Niaimi Vishal Madan |
spellingShingle |
Yi Zhen Chiang Firas Al-Niaimi Vishal Madan Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery Topical anaesthetics 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream tetracaine gel liposomal lidocaine gel Laser skin microneedling |
author_facet |
Yi Zhen Chiang Firas Al-Niaimi Vishal Madan |
author_sort |
Yi Zhen Chiang |
title |
Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling |
title_short |
Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling |
title_full |
Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling |
title_fullStr |
Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling |
title_sort |
comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery |
issn |
0974-2077 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Background: Topical anaesthetics are effective for patients undergoing superficial dermatological and laser procedures. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and patient preference of three commonly used topical anaesthetics: (2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream (EMLA ® ), 4% tetracaine gel (Ametop TM ) and 4% liposomal lidocaine gel (LMX4 ® )) in patients undergoing laser procedures and skin microneedling. Settings and Design: This was a prospective, double-blind study of patients undergoing laser and skin microneedling procedures at a laser unit in a tertiary referral dermatology centre. Materials and Methods: All 29 patients had three topical anaesthetics applied under occlusion for 1 hour prior to the procedure, at different treatment sites within the same anatomical zone. A self-assessment numerical pain rating scale was given to each patient to rate the pain during the procedure and each patient was asked to specify their preferred choice of topical anaesthetic at the end of the procedure. Statistical Analysis: Parametric data (mean pain scores and frequency of topical anaesthetic agent of choice) were compared using the paired samples t-test. A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results and Conclusions: Patients reported a mean (±SD; 95% confidence interval) pain score of 5 (±2.58; 3.66-6.46) with Ametop TM , 4.38 (±2.53; 2.64-4.89) with EMLA ® and 3.91 (±1.95; 2.65-4.76) with LMX4 ® . There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between the different topical anaesthetics. The majority of patients preferred LMX4 ® as their choice of topical anaesthetic for dermatological laser and skin microneedling procedures. |
topic |
Topical anaesthetics 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream tetracaine gel liposomal lidocaine gel Laser skin microneedling |
url |
http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2015;volume=8;issue=3;spage=143;epage=146;aulast=Chiang |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yizhenchiang comparativeefficacyandpatientpreferenceoftopicalanaestheticsindermatologicallasertreatmentsandskinmicroneedling AT firasalniaimi comparativeefficacyandpatientpreferenceoftopicalanaestheticsindermatologicallasertreatmentsandskinmicroneedling AT vishalmadan comparativeefficacyandpatientpreferenceoftopicalanaestheticsindermatologicallasertreatmentsandskinmicroneedling |
_version_ |
1716798763849220096 |