Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling

Background: Topical anaesthetics are effective for patients undergoing superficial dermatological and laser procedures. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and patient preference of three commonly used topical anaesthetics: (2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream (EMLA ® ), 4% tetracaine gel (Am...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Zhen Chiang, Firas Al-Niaimi, Vishal Madan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2015;volume=8;issue=3;spage=143;epage=146;aulast=Chiang
id doaj-6839568189024af796f8745e9f9578a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6839568189024af796f8745e9f9578a92020-11-24T20:52:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 0974-20772015-01-018314314610.4103/0974-2077.167270Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedlingYi Zhen ChiangFiras Al-NiaimiVishal MadanBackground: Topical anaesthetics are effective for patients undergoing superficial dermatological and laser procedures. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and patient preference of three commonly used topical anaesthetics: (2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream (EMLA ® ), 4% tetracaine gel (Ametop TM ) and 4% liposomal lidocaine gel (LMX4 ® )) in patients undergoing laser procedures and skin microneedling. Settings and Design: This was a prospective, double-blind study of patients undergoing laser and skin microneedling procedures at a laser unit in a tertiary referral dermatology centre. Materials and Methods: All 29 patients had three topical anaesthetics applied under occlusion for 1 hour prior to the procedure, at different treatment sites within the same anatomical zone. A self-assessment numerical pain rating scale was given to each patient to rate the pain during the procedure and each patient was asked to specify their preferred choice of topical anaesthetic at the end of the procedure. Statistical Analysis: Parametric data (mean pain scores and frequency of topical anaesthetic agent of choice) were compared using the paired samples t-test. A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results and Conclusions: Patients reported a mean (±SD; 95% confidence interval) pain score of 5 (±2.58; 3.66-6.46) with Ametop TM , 4.38 (±2.53; 2.64-4.89) with EMLA ® and 3.91 (±1.95; 2.65-4.76) with LMX4 ® . There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between the different topical anaesthetics. The majority of patients preferred LMX4 ® as their choice of topical anaesthetic for dermatological laser and skin microneedling procedures.http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2015;volume=8;issue=3;spage=143;epage=146;aulast=ChiangTopical anaesthetics2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine creamtetracaine gelliposomal lidocaine gelLaserskin microneedling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yi Zhen Chiang
Firas Al-Niaimi
Vishal Madan
spellingShingle Yi Zhen Chiang
Firas Al-Niaimi
Vishal Madan
Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Topical anaesthetics
2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream
tetracaine gel
liposomal lidocaine gel
Laser
skin microneedling
author_facet Yi Zhen Chiang
Firas Al-Niaimi
Vishal Madan
author_sort Yi Zhen Chiang
title Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling
title_short Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling
title_full Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling
title_sort comparative efficacy and patient preference of topical anaesthetics in dermatological laser treatments and skin microneedling
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
issn 0974-2077
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Background: Topical anaesthetics are effective for patients undergoing superficial dermatological and laser procedures. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and patient preference of three commonly used topical anaesthetics: (2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream (EMLA ® ), 4% tetracaine gel (Ametop TM ) and 4% liposomal lidocaine gel (LMX4 ® )) in patients undergoing laser procedures and skin microneedling. Settings and Design: This was a prospective, double-blind study of patients undergoing laser and skin microneedling procedures at a laser unit in a tertiary referral dermatology centre. Materials and Methods: All 29 patients had three topical anaesthetics applied under occlusion for 1 hour prior to the procedure, at different treatment sites within the same anatomical zone. A self-assessment numerical pain rating scale was given to each patient to rate the pain during the procedure and each patient was asked to specify their preferred choice of topical anaesthetic at the end of the procedure. Statistical Analysis: Parametric data (mean pain scores and frequency of topical anaesthetic agent of choice) were compared using the paired samples t-test. A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results and Conclusions: Patients reported a mean (±SD; 95% confidence interval) pain score of 5 (±2.58; 3.66-6.46) with Ametop TM , 4.38 (±2.53; 2.64-4.89) with EMLA ® and 3.91 (±1.95; 2.65-4.76) with LMX4 ® . There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between the different topical anaesthetics. The majority of patients preferred LMX4 ® as their choice of topical anaesthetic for dermatological laser and skin microneedling procedures.
topic Topical anaesthetics
2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream
tetracaine gel
liposomal lidocaine gel
Laser
skin microneedling
url http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2015;volume=8;issue=3;spage=143;epage=146;aulast=Chiang
work_keys_str_mv AT yizhenchiang comparativeefficacyandpatientpreferenceoftopicalanaestheticsindermatologicallasertreatmentsandskinmicroneedling
AT firasalniaimi comparativeefficacyandpatientpreferenceoftopicalanaestheticsindermatologicallasertreatmentsandskinmicroneedling
AT vishalmadan comparativeefficacyandpatientpreferenceoftopicalanaestheticsindermatologicallasertreatmentsandskinmicroneedling
_version_ 1716798763849220096