Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
<p>Forest is in trouble. The most recent (2015) FAO Forest Resources Assessment shows an encouraging trend towards a decrease in deforestation rates, but it also points out that since 1990 total forest loss corresponds to an area the size of South Africa. Efforts to curtail deforestation r...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Geographica Helvetica |
Online Access: | https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/253/2018/gh-73-253-2018.pdf |
id |
doaj-683802f8c8714305ae17d5fb87a5af03 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-683802f8c8714305ae17d5fb87a5af032020-11-24T21:07:58ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982018-10-017325326010.5194/gh-73-253-2018Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundariesM. Côte0F. Wartmann1R. Purves2R. Purves3Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, SwitzerlandEidgenössiche Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft (WSL), Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandDepartment of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, SwitzerlandURPP Language and Space, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland<p>Forest is in trouble. The most recent (2015) FAO Forest Resources Assessment shows an encouraging trend towards a decrease in deforestation rates, but it also points out that since 1990 total forest loss corresponds to an area the size of South Africa. Efforts to curtail deforestation require reliable assessments, yet current definitions for what a forest exactly is differ significantly across countries, institutions and epistemic communities. Those differences have implications for forest management efforts: they entail different understandings about where exactly a forest starts and ends, and therefore also engender misunderstandings about where a forest <i>should</i> start and end, and about how forests should be managed. This special issue brings together different perspectives from practitioners and academic disciplines – including linguistics, geographic information science and human geography – around the problem of understanding and characterizing forest. By bringing together different disciplinary viewpoints, we hope to contribute to ongoing interdisciplinary efforts to analyse forest change. In this introduction, we propose that interrogating the relationship between forest definitions, boundaries and ways of valuing forests constitutes a productive way to critically conceptualize the trouble that forest is in.</p>https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/253/2018/gh-73-253-2018.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Côte F. Wartmann R. Purves R. Purves |
spellingShingle |
M. Côte F. Wartmann R. Purves R. Purves Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries Geographica Helvetica |
author_facet |
M. Côte F. Wartmann R. Purves R. Purves |
author_sort |
M. Côte |
title |
Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries |
title_short |
Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries |
title_full |
Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries |
title_fullStr |
Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries |
title_sort |
introduction: the trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geographica Helvetica |
issn |
0016-7312 2194-8798 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
<p>Forest is in trouble. The most recent (2015) FAO Forest
Resources Assessment shows an encouraging trend towards a decrease in
deforestation rates, but it also points out that since 1990 total forest
loss corresponds to an area the size of South Africa. Efforts to curtail
deforestation require reliable assessments, yet current definitions for what
a forest exactly is differ significantly across countries, institutions and
epistemic communities. Those differences have implications for forest
management efforts: they entail different understandings about where exactly
a forest starts and ends, and therefore also engender misunderstandings
about where a forest <i>should</i> start and end, and about how forests should be
managed. This special issue brings together different perspectives from
practitioners and academic disciplines – including linguistics, geographic
information science and human geography – around the problem of
understanding and characterizing forest. By bringing together different
disciplinary viewpoints, we hope to contribute to ongoing interdisciplinary
efforts to analyse forest change. In this introduction, we propose that
interrogating the relationship between forest definitions, boundaries and
ways of valuing forests constitutes a productive way to critically
conceptualize the trouble that forest is in.</p> |
url |
https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/253/2018/gh-73-253-2018.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mcote introductionthetroublewithforestdefinitionsvaluesandboundaries AT fwartmann introductionthetroublewithforestdefinitionsvaluesandboundaries AT rpurves introductionthetroublewithforestdefinitionsvaluesandboundaries AT rpurves introductionthetroublewithforestdefinitionsvaluesandboundaries |
_version_ |
1716761288258879488 |