Product liability for ADAS; legal and human factors perspectives

A variety of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) has been and is still being developed, aiming to make car driving more comfortable and safe, while at the same time enhancing traffic efficiency. However, the successful implementation of ADAS is affected by a variety of technical and non-techni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kiliaan van Wees, Karel Brookhuis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: TU Delft Open 2005-12-01
Series:European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/4413
id doaj-6836e47030a84e3dba9db5ed05783222
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6836e47030a84e3dba9db5ed057832222021-07-26T08:49:18ZengTU Delft OpenEuropean Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1567-71412005-12-015410.18757/ejtir.2005.5.4.44133909Product liability for ADAS; legal and human factors perspectivesKiliaan van Wees0Karel Brookhuis1Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementA variety of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) has been and is still being developed, aiming to make car driving more comfortable and safe, while at the same time enhancing traffic efficiency. However, the successful implementation of ADAS is affected by a variety of technical and non-technical issues, one of them being possible implications in the field of legal liability. Potential liability of system developers and car manufacturers is often labelled as a barrier for the rapid deployment of new technology. In the present contribution the European Product Liability Directive’s concept of a defective product is described and analysed from both a legal and a human factors perspective. In legal debates concerning product liability, generally two different approaches can be distinguished, one which is based on consumer expectations and a second which focuses, rather, on a risk-benefit analysis. As will be explained, the two may be seen as complementary and not as being mutually exclusive.Both tests can only be properly applied with the help of human factor expertise.https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/4413
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kiliaan van Wees
Karel Brookhuis
spellingShingle Kiliaan van Wees
Karel Brookhuis
Product liability for ADAS; legal and human factors perspectives
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
author_facet Kiliaan van Wees
Karel Brookhuis
author_sort Kiliaan van Wees
title Product liability for ADAS; legal and human factors perspectives
title_short Product liability for ADAS; legal and human factors perspectives
title_full Product liability for ADAS; legal and human factors perspectives
title_fullStr Product liability for ADAS; legal and human factors perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Product liability for ADAS; legal and human factors perspectives
title_sort product liability for adas; legal and human factors perspectives
publisher TU Delft Open
series European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
issn 1567-7141
publishDate 2005-12-01
description A variety of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) has been and is still being developed, aiming to make car driving more comfortable and safe, while at the same time enhancing traffic efficiency. However, the successful implementation of ADAS is affected by a variety of technical and non-technical issues, one of them being possible implications in the field of legal liability. Potential liability of system developers and car manufacturers is often labelled as a barrier for the rapid deployment of new technology. In the present contribution the European Product Liability Directive’s concept of a defective product is described and analysed from both a legal and a human factors perspective. In legal debates concerning product liability, generally two different approaches can be distinguished, one which is based on consumer expectations and a second which focuses, rather, on a risk-benefit analysis. As will be explained, the two may be seen as complementary and not as being mutually exclusive.Both tests can only be properly applied with the help of human factor expertise.
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/4413
work_keys_str_mv AT kiliaanvanwees productliabilityforadaslegalandhumanfactorsperspectives
AT karelbrookhuis productliabilityforadaslegalandhumanfactorsperspectives
_version_ 1721281962390323200