Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program

Science One is a full academic year interdisciplinary alternative to the traditional first-year experience in the Faculty of Science at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Anecdotal reports suggest that alumni/ae of the program do very well in upper-level classes and many become successful gra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Waltham, Mark MacLean, Hiroko Nakahara, Domingo Louis-Martinez, Celeste Leander, Neil Dryden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2012-12-01
Series:Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol3/iss2/4
id doaj-68246eb44e3f4c4085c9099381c99f9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68246eb44e3f4c4085c9099381c99f9b2020-11-24T22:56:20ZengSociety for Teaching and Learning in Higher EducationCanadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1918-29022012-12-0132http://dx.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2012.2.4Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One ProgramChris WalthamMark MacLeanHiroko NakaharaDomingo Louis-MartinezCeleste LeanderNeil DrydenScience One is a full academic year interdisciplinary alternative to the traditional first-year experience in the Faculty of Science at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Anecdotal reports suggest that alumni/ae of the program do very well in upper-level classes and many become successful graduate and medical students. The high faculty/student ratio makes the program an expensive one, however, and thus we have sought rigorous evidence of the benefits to our students. Our approach has been a value-added one; we have compared high-school and upper-level undergraduate grades for students in all UBC's first-year science programs. We have found a clear signal that there is a large benefit to participating in Science One, and conclude that this arises from a combination of the recruitment of enthusiastic students who are up for a challenge, the Science One admissions process, and taking the program itself.Science One consiste en une année scolaire interdisciplinaire complète qui représente une variante de l’expérience traditionnelle vécue en première année à la Faculté des sciences de l’Université de la Colombie-Britannique (UBC). Des rapports isolés suggèrent que les anciens étudiants du programme obtiennent de très bons résultats dans les cours de niveau supérieur et plusieurs obtiennent leur diplôme avec succès et étudient en médecine. Cependant, le ratio élevé enseignant/étudiant fait en sorte que le programme coûte cher, c’est pourquoi les auteurs ont cherché à obtenir des données probantes sur les avantages qu’il présente pour leurs étudiants. Ils ont employé la méthode de la valeur ajoutée; ont comparé les notes obtenues au secondaire et celles des étudiants de premier cycle inscrits à des cours de niveau supérieur dans tous les programmes scientifiques offerts à l’UBC. Ils ont découvert que la participation à Science One est très bénéfique et ont conclu que cela résulte d’une combinaison entre le recrutement d’étudiants enthousiastes qui souhaitent relever un défi, le processus d’admission à Science One et le fait de suivre le programme.http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol3/iss2/4interdisciplinarysciencefirst-yearvalue-added analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chris Waltham
Mark MacLean
Hiroko Nakahara
Domingo Louis-Martinez
Celeste Leander
Neil Dryden
spellingShingle Chris Waltham
Mark MacLean
Hiroko Nakahara
Domingo Louis-Martinez
Celeste Leander
Neil Dryden
Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program
Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
interdisciplinary
science
first-year
value-added analysis
author_facet Chris Waltham
Mark MacLean
Hiroko Nakahara
Domingo Louis-Martinez
Celeste Leander
Neil Dryden
author_sort Chris Waltham
title Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program
title_short Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program
title_full Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program
title_fullStr Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program
title_full_unstemmed Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program
title_sort are we doing any good? a value-added analysis of ubc's science one program
publisher Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
series Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
issn 1918-2902
publishDate 2012-12-01
description Science One is a full academic year interdisciplinary alternative to the traditional first-year experience in the Faculty of Science at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Anecdotal reports suggest that alumni/ae of the program do very well in upper-level classes and many become successful graduate and medical students. The high faculty/student ratio makes the program an expensive one, however, and thus we have sought rigorous evidence of the benefits to our students. Our approach has been a value-added one; we have compared high-school and upper-level undergraduate grades for students in all UBC's first-year science programs. We have found a clear signal that there is a large benefit to participating in Science One, and conclude that this arises from a combination of the recruitment of enthusiastic students who are up for a challenge, the Science One admissions process, and taking the program itself.Science One consiste en une année scolaire interdisciplinaire complète qui représente une variante de l’expérience traditionnelle vécue en première année à la Faculté des sciences de l’Université de la Colombie-Britannique (UBC). Des rapports isolés suggèrent que les anciens étudiants du programme obtiennent de très bons résultats dans les cours de niveau supérieur et plusieurs obtiennent leur diplôme avec succès et étudient en médecine. Cependant, le ratio élevé enseignant/étudiant fait en sorte que le programme coûte cher, c’est pourquoi les auteurs ont cherché à obtenir des données probantes sur les avantages qu’il présente pour leurs étudiants. Ils ont employé la méthode de la valeur ajoutée; ont comparé les notes obtenues au secondaire et celles des étudiants de premier cycle inscrits à des cours de niveau supérieur dans tous les programmes scientifiques offerts à l’UBC. Ils ont découvert que la participation à Science One est très bénéfique et ont conclu que cela résulte d’une combinaison entre le recrutement d’étudiants enthousiastes qui souhaitent relever un défi, le processus d’admission à Science One et le fait de suivre le programme.
topic interdisciplinary
science
first-year
value-added analysis
url http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol3/iss2/4
work_keys_str_mv AT chriswaltham arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram
AT markmaclean arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram
AT hirokonakahara arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram
AT domingolouismartinez arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram
AT celesteleander arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram
AT neildryden arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram
_version_ 1725653838685274112