Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program
Science One is a full academic year interdisciplinary alternative to the traditional first-year experience in the Faculty of Science at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Anecdotal reports suggest that alumni/ae of the program do very well in upper-level classes and many become successful gra...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
2012-12-01
|
Series: | Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol3/iss2/4 |
id |
doaj-68246eb44e3f4c4085c9099381c99f9b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-68246eb44e3f4c4085c9099381c99f9b2020-11-24T22:56:20ZengSociety for Teaching and Learning in Higher EducationCanadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1918-29022012-12-0132http://dx.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2012.2.4Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One ProgramChris WalthamMark MacLeanHiroko NakaharaDomingo Louis-MartinezCeleste LeanderNeil DrydenScience One is a full academic year interdisciplinary alternative to the traditional first-year experience in the Faculty of Science at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Anecdotal reports suggest that alumni/ae of the program do very well in upper-level classes and many become successful graduate and medical students. The high faculty/student ratio makes the program an expensive one, however, and thus we have sought rigorous evidence of the benefits to our students. Our approach has been a value-added one; we have compared high-school and upper-level undergraduate grades for students in all UBC's first-year science programs. We have found a clear signal that there is a large benefit to participating in Science One, and conclude that this arises from a combination of the recruitment of enthusiastic students who are up for a challenge, the Science One admissions process, and taking the program itself.Science One consiste en une année scolaire interdisciplinaire complète qui représente une variante de l’expérience traditionnelle vécue en première année à la Faculté des sciences de l’Université de la Colombie-Britannique (UBC). Des rapports isolés suggèrent que les anciens étudiants du programme obtiennent de très bons résultats dans les cours de niveau supérieur et plusieurs obtiennent leur diplôme avec succès et étudient en médecine. Cependant, le ratio élevé enseignant/étudiant fait en sorte que le programme coûte cher, c’est pourquoi les auteurs ont cherché à obtenir des données probantes sur les avantages qu’il présente pour leurs étudiants. Ils ont employé la méthode de la valeur ajoutée; ont comparé les notes obtenues au secondaire et celles des étudiants de premier cycle inscrits à des cours de niveau supérieur dans tous les programmes scientifiques offerts à l’UBC. Ils ont découvert que la participation à Science One est très bénéfique et ont conclu que cela résulte d’une combinaison entre le recrutement d’étudiants enthousiastes qui souhaitent relever un défi, le processus d’admission à Science One et le fait de suivre le programme.http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol3/iss2/4interdisciplinarysciencefirst-yearvalue-added analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chris Waltham Mark MacLean Hiroko Nakahara Domingo Louis-Martinez Celeste Leander Neil Dryden |
spellingShingle |
Chris Waltham Mark MacLean Hiroko Nakahara Domingo Louis-Martinez Celeste Leander Neil Dryden Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning interdisciplinary science first-year value-added analysis |
author_facet |
Chris Waltham Mark MacLean Hiroko Nakahara Domingo Louis-Martinez Celeste Leander Neil Dryden |
author_sort |
Chris Waltham |
title |
Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program |
title_short |
Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program |
title_full |
Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program |
title_fullStr |
Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC's Science One Program |
title_sort |
are we doing any good? a value-added analysis of ubc's science one program |
publisher |
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education |
series |
Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning |
issn |
1918-2902 |
publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
description |
Science One is a full academic year interdisciplinary alternative to the traditional first-year experience in the Faculty of Science at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Anecdotal reports suggest that alumni/ae of the program do very well in upper-level classes and many become successful graduate and medical students. The high faculty/student ratio makes the program an expensive one, however, and thus we have sought rigorous evidence of the benefits to our students. Our approach has been a value-added one; we have compared high-school and upper-level undergraduate grades for students in all UBC's first-year science programs. We have found a clear signal that there is a large benefit to participating in Science One, and conclude that this arises from a combination of the recruitment of enthusiastic students who are up for a challenge, the Science One admissions process, and taking the program itself.Science One consiste en une année scolaire interdisciplinaire complète qui représente une variante de l’expérience traditionnelle vécue en première année à la Faculté des sciences de l’Université de la Colombie-Britannique (UBC). Des rapports isolés suggèrent que les anciens étudiants du programme obtiennent de très bons résultats dans les cours de niveau supérieur et plusieurs obtiennent leur diplôme avec succès et étudient en médecine. Cependant, le ratio élevé enseignant/étudiant fait en sorte que le programme coûte cher, c’est pourquoi les auteurs ont cherché à obtenir des données probantes sur les avantages qu’il présente pour leurs étudiants. Ils ont employé la méthode de la valeur ajoutée; ont comparé les notes obtenues au secondaire et celles des étudiants de premier cycle inscrits à des cours de niveau supérieur dans tous les programmes scientifiques offerts à l’UBC. Ils ont découvert que la participation à Science One est très bénéfique et ont conclu que cela résulte d’une combinaison entre le recrutement d’étudiants enthousiastes qui souhaitent relever un défi, le processus d’admission à Science One et le fait de suivre le programme. |
topic |
interdisciplinary science first-year value-added analysis |
url |
http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol3/iss2/4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chriswaltham arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram AT markmaclean arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram AT hirokonakahara arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram AT domingolouismartinez arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram AT celesteleander arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram AT neildryden arewedoinganygoodavalueaddedanalysisofubcsscienceoneprogram |
_version_ |
1725653838685274112 |