An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Some have suggested gays and lesbians may carry a greater burden of colorectal cancer. To date, individual sexual orientation data are not available in cancer surveillance registries. This prevents an assessment of differences in col...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miao Xiaopeng, Ozonoff Al, Boehmer Ulrike
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-09-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/400
id doaj-6821cae432a94ef2a2c4ec20edd6bd65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6821cae432a94ef2a2c4ec20edd6bd652020-11-24T23:55:59ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072011-09-0111140010.1186/1471-2407-11-400An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientationMiao XiaopengOzonoff AlBoehmer Ulrike<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Some have suggested gays and lesbians may carry a greater burden of colorectal cancer. To date, individual sexual orientation data are not available in cancer surveillance registries. This prevents an assessment of differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by sexual orientation, using individual-level data.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We use an ecological approach to examine differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by county-level sexual orientation data. From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program we obtain population-based surveillance data on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality from 1996 to 2004. We use Census 2000 data on same-sex partnered households, a proxy of sexual orientation, to derive county-level sexual orientation data. Using multiple regression models, we examined the county-level association of sexual minority density with colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After controlling for race and SES, we identify a significant positive association between greater density of sexual minority men and women and colorectal cancer incidence. With respect to colorectal cancer mortality, we identify a positive association with density of sexual minority men, but not women.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In the absence of surveillance data on sexual minority individuals, ecological analyses provide estimates of associations at the aggregate level, thereby providing crucial information for follow-up studies.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/400
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miao Xiaopeng
Ozonoff Al
Boehmer Ulrike
spellingShingle Miao Xiaopeng
Ozonoff Al
Boehmer Ulrike
An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
BMC Cancer
author_facet Miao Xiaopeng
Ozonoff Al
Boehmer Ulrike
author_sort Miao Xiaopeng
title An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_short An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_full An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_fullStr An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_full_unstemmed An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_sort ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: differences by sexual orientation
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2011-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Some have suggested gays and lesbians may carry a greater burden of colorectal cancer. To date, individual sexual orientation data are not available in cancer surveillance registries. This prevents an assessment of differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by sexual orientation, using individual-level data.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We use an ecological approach to examine differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by county-level sexual orientation data. From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program we obtain population-based surveillance data on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality from 1996 to 2004. We use Census 2000 data on same-sex partnered households, a proxy of sexual orientation, to derive county-level sexual orientation data. Using multiple regression models, we examined the county-level association of sexual minority density with colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After controlling for race and SES, we identify a significant positive association between greater density of sexual minority men and women and colorectal cancer incidence. With respect to colorectal cancer mortality, we identify a positive association with density of sexual minority men, but not women.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In the absence of surveillance data on sexual minority individuals, ecological analyses provide estimates of associations at the aggregate level, thereby providing crucial information for follow-up studies.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/400
work_keys_str_mv AT miaoxiaopeng anecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT ozonoffal anecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT boehmerulrike anecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT miaoxiaopeng ecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT ozonoffal ecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT boehmerulrike ecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
_version_ 1725460264102395904