Experience can increase prism fusion range

Aim:  Differences in near prism fusion ranges (PFR) were assessed in 4 groups of participants who differed in experience of exposure to such testing. The effect of encouragement in the two least experienced groups was also tested. Methods:  The near base in (BI) and base out (BO) fusional amplitudes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Waheed Zaman, Carolyn Leach, David Buckley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: White Rose University Press 2012-08-01
Series:British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/74
id doaj-67f33197b33240a9be10d5c92abd5b48
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67f33197b33240a9be10d5c92abd5b482020-11-24T22:09:53ZengWhite Rose University PressBritish and Irish Orthoptic Journal2516-35902012-08-0110565910.22599/bioj.7473Experience can increase prism fusion rangeWaheed Zaman0Carolyn Leach1David Buckley2Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, SheffieldAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, SheffieldAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, SheffieldAim:  Differences in near prism fusion ranges (PFR) were assessed in 4 groups of participants who differed in experience of exposure to such testing. The effect of encouragement in the two least experienced groups was also tested. Methods:  The near base in (BI) and base out (BO) fusional amplitudes (FA) were measured in four groups of 10 participants, all with normal or corrected to normal vision. One group was naÏve to such testing, being non-orthoptic students, the other three groups consisted separately of Year One, Two and Three student orthoptists. The two most inexperienced groups, NaÏve and Year One student orthoptists, were also tested a second time with encouragement to try as hard as possible to increase their fusion amplitudes. Results:  Year Two and Year Three students had significantly ( p < 0.001, often over 20∆) larger BO FA than naÏve students or Year One orthoptic students. No such differences were seen for BI measures. Encouragement also significantly ( p < 0.01), but modestly (<6∆), increased BO FA and slightly (about 1∆, p < 0.05) increased BI FA. Conclusions:  Experience did increase PFR but this was mainly in BO fusion amplitudes and was far greater than obtained by encouraging participants. The experience needed to obtain this increase appeared to be the exposure occurring in one year of training to be an orthoptist. Further experiments could help clarify the factors involved in this improvement by tracking any increase throughout this first year and also look for changes in performance in other orthoptic tests.https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/74ExperienceFusionPrismRange
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Waheed Zaman
Carolyn Leach
David Buckley
spellingShingle Waheed Zaman
Carolyn Leach
David Buckley
Experience can increase prism fusion range
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Experience
Fusion
Prism
Range
author_facet Waheed Zaman
Carolyn Leach
David Buckley
author_sort Waheed Zaman
title Experience can increase prism fusion range
title_short Experience can increase prism fusion range
title_full Experience can increase prism fusion range
title_fullStr Experience can increase prism fusion range
title_full_unstemmed Experience can increase prism fusion range
title_sort experience can increase prism fusion range
publisher White Rose University Press
series British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
issn 2516-3590
publishDate 2012-08-01
description Aim:  Differences in near prism fusion ranges (PFR) were assessed in 4 groups of participants who differed in experience of exposure to such testing. The effect of encouragement in the two least experienced groups was also tested. Methods:  The near base in (BI) and base out (BO) fusional amplitudes (FA) were measured in four groups of 10 participants, all with normal or corrected to normal vision. One group was naÏve to such testing, being non-orthoptic students, the other three groups consisted separately of Year One, Two and Three student orthoptists. The two most inexperienced groups, NaÏve and Year One student orthoptists, were also tested a second time with encouragement to try as hard as possible to increase their fusion amplitudes. Results:  Year Two and Year Three students had significantly ( p < 0.001, often over 20∆) larger BO FA than naÏve students or Year One orthoptic students. No such differences were seen for BI measures. Encouragement also significantly ( p < 0.01), but modestly (<6∆), increased BO FA and slightly (about 1∆, p < 0.05) increased BI FA. Conclusions:  Experience did increase PFR but this was mainly in BO fusion amplitudes and was far greater than obtained by encouraging participants. The experience needed to obtain this increase appeared to be the exposure occurring in one year of training to be an orthoptist. Further experiments could help clarify the factors involved in this improvement by tracking any increase throughout this first year and also look for changes in performance in other orthoptic tests.
topic Experience
Fusion
Prism
Range
url https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/74
work_keys_str_mv AT waheedzaman experiencecanincreaseprismfusionrange
AT carolynleach experiencecanincreaseprismfusionrange
AT davidbuckley experiencecanincreaseprismfusionrange
_version_ 1725810269151559680