Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy

Many American Indian (AI) and Alaska native (AN) patients do not complete guideline-concordant cancer care for the 4 most common cancers. Our aim was to better understand AI/AN attitudes toward radiation therapy (RT). Patients eligible for this survey study were AI/AN patients with cancer at the Pho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samir H. Patel MD, Sasha Ebrahimi PhD, Donald W. Northfelt MD, Timothy E. Mathews FNP-BC, Farhia M. Omar MPH, Erika D. Martinez MBA, Todd A. DeWees PhD, Janet M. Okamoto PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-07-01
Series:Cancer Control
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274820945991
id doaj-67f21dd47bd24443abfca3b502f01c8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67f21dd47bd24443abfca3b502f01c8b2020-11-25T03:20:16ZengSAGE PublishingCancer Control1073-27482020-07-012710.1177/1073274820945991Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation TherapySamir H. Patel MD0Sasha Ebrahimi PhD1Donald W. Northfelt MD2Timothy E. Mathews FNP-BC3Farhia M. Omar MPH4Erika D. Martinez MBA5Todd A. DeWees PhD6Janet M. Okamoto PhD7 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA Oncology Center of Excellence, Phoenix Indian Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA Office of Health Disparities Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA Office of Health Disparities Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ, USA Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ, USAMany American Indian (AI) and Alaska native (AN) patients do not complete guideline-concordant cancer care for the 4 most common cancers. Our aim was to better understand AI/AN attitudes toward radiation therapy (RT). Patients eligible for this survey study were AI/AN patients with cancer at the Phoenix Indian Medical Center who either received previous RT or were recommended to receive RT. An 18-item questionnaire was administered to each of the 50 participants from October 1, 2018, through February 15, 2019. Willingness to travel for RT was compared to respondent characteristics, concerns regarding RT, and obstacles to obtain RT. Duration of RT was important to 78% of patients: 24% would consider traveling 25 miles or more for a standard course, and 48% would travel that distance for a shorter course ( P < .001). The top-ranked barriers to RT were transportation, cost of treatment, and insurance compatibility. The top-ranked concerns about RT were adverse effects, cost of treatment, and fear of RT. Concerns about adverse effects were associated with the radiation team’s inability to explain the treatment ( P = .05). Transportation concerns were significantly associated with accessibility ( P = .02), communication with the RT team ( P = .02), and fear of RT ( P = .04). AI/AN patients are concerned about the adverse effects of RT and the logistics of treatment, particularly costs, transportation, and insurance compatibility. Use of culturally specific education and hypofractionation regimens may increase acceptance of RT for AI/AN patients with cancer, and this hypothesis will be tested in a future educational intervention-based study.https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274820945991
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samir H. Patel MD
Sasha Ebrahimi PhD
Donald W. Northfelt MD
Timothy E. Mathews FNP-BC
Farhia M. Omar MPH
Erika D. Martinez MBA
Todd A. DeWees PhD
Janet M. Okamoto PhD
spellingShingle Samir H. Patel MD
Sasha Ebrahimi PhD
Donald W. Northfelt MD
Timothy E. Mathews FNP-BC
Farhia M. Omar MPH
Erika D. Martinez MBA
Todd A. DeWees PhD
Janet M. Okamoto PhD
Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy
Cancer Control
author_facet Samir H. Patel MD
Sasha Ebrahimi PhD
Donald W. Northfelt MD
Timothy E. Mathews FNP-BC
Farhia M. Omar MPH
Erika D. Martinez MBA
Todd A. DeWees PhD
Janet M. Okamoto PhD
author_sort Samir H. Patel MD
title Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy
title_short Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy
title_full Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy
title_sort understanding american indian perceptions toward radiation therapy
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Cancer Control
issn 1073-2748
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Many American Indian (AI) and Alaska native (AN) patients do not complete guideline-concordant cancer care for the 4 most common cancers. Our aim was to better understand AI/AN attitudes toward radiation therapy (RT). Patients eligible for this survey study were AI/AN patients with cancer at the Phoenix Indian Medical Center who either received previous RT or were recommended to receive RT. An 18-item questionnaire was administered to each of the 50 participants from October 1, 2018, through February 15, 2019. Willingness to travel for RT was compared to respondent characteristics, concerns regarding RT, and obstacles to obtain RT. Duration of RT was important to 78% of patients: 24% would consider traveling 25 miles or more for a standard course, and 48% would travel that distance for a shorter course ( P < .001). The top-ranked barriers to RT were transportation, cost of treatment, and insurance compatibility. The top-ranked concerns about RT were adverse effects, cost of treatment, and fear of RT. Concerns about adverse effects were associated with the radiation team’s inability to explain the treatment ( P = .05). Transportation concerns were significantly associated with accessibility ( P = .02), communication with the RT team ( P = .02), and fear of RT ( P = .04). AI/AN patients are concerned about the adverse effects of RT and the logistics of treatment, particularly costs, transportation, and insurance compatibility. Use of culturally specific education and hypofractionation regimens may increase acceptance of RT for AI/AN patients with cancer, and this hypothesis will be tested in a future educational intervention-based study.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274820945991
work_keys_str_mv AT samirhpatelmd understandingamericanindianperceptionstowardradiationtherapy
AT sashaebrahimiphd understandingamericanindianperceptionstowardradiationtherapy
AT donaldwnorthfeltmd understandingamericanindianperceptionstowardradiationtherapy
AT timothyemathewsfnpbc understandingamericanindianperceptionstowardradiationtherapy
AT farhiamomarmph understandingamericanindianperceptionstowardradiationtherapy
AT erikadmartinezmba understandingamericanindianperceptionstowardradiationtherapy
AT toddadeweesphd understandingamericanindianperceptionstowardradiationtherapy
AT janetmokamotophd understandingamericanindianperceptionstowardradiationtherapy
_version_ 1724618456254382080