Numeric Estimation and Response Options: An Examination of the Accuracy of Numeric and Vague Quantifier Responses

Many survey questions ask respondents to provide responses that contain quantitative information, often using either numeric open-ended responses or vague quantifier scales. Generally, survey researchers have argued against the use of vague quantifier scales. However, no study has compared accuracy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tarek Al Baghal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2014-02-01
Series:Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jmmss/article/view/18476
id doaj-67e9f8934a304f36af28e6843d6fa177
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67e9f8934a304f36af28e6843d6fa1772020-11-25T03:06:01ZengUniversity of Arizona LibrariesJournal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences2159-78552014-02-0152587510.2458/v5i2.1847618048Numeric Estimation and Response Options: An Examination of the Accuracy of Numeric and Vague Quantifier ResponsesTarek Al Baghal0University of EssexMany survey questions ask respondents to provide responses that contain quantitative information, often using either numeric open-ended responses or vague quantifier scales. Generally, survey researchers have argued against the use of vague quantifier scales. However, no study has compared accuracy between vague quantifiers and numeric open-ended responses. This study is the first to do so, using a unique data set created through an experiment. 124 participants studied word lists of paired words, where the experiment employed a 2 (context) x 2 (response form) x 6 (actual frequency) factorial design, with the context and form factors manipulated between subjects, and the frequency factor manipulated within subjects. The two conditions for the context factor are same-context and different-context conditions where the context word either was the same or different for each presentation of the target word. The other between subject factor was response form, where participants responded to a recall test using either vague quantifiers or numeric open-ended responses. Translations of vague quantifiers were obtained and used in accuracy tests. Finally, a numeracy test was administered to collect information about respondent numeracy. Different accuracy measures are estimated and analyzed. Results show context memory did not have a significant effect. Numeracy has an effect, but the direction depends on form and context. Actual frequency had a significant effect on accuracy, but did not interact with other variables. Importantly, results suggest vague quantifiers tend to improve accuracy more often relative to numeric open-ended response.   DOI:10.2458/azu_jmmss_v5i2_Al_baghalhttps://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jmmss/article/view/18476response optionsnumeric cognitionvague quantifiersrecall
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tarek Al Baghal
spellingShingle Tarek Al Baghal
Numeric Estimation and Response Options: An Examination of the Accuracy of Numeric and Vague Quantifier Responses
Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences
response options
numeric cognition
vague quantifiers
recall
author_facet Tarek Al Baghal
author_sort Tarek Al Baghal
title Numeric Estimation and Response Options: An Examination of the Accuracy of Numeric and Vague Quantifier Responses
title_short Numeric Estimation and Response Options: An Examination of the Accuracy of Numeric and Vague Quantifier Responses
title_full Numeric Estimation and Response Options: An Examination of the Accuracy of Numeric and Vague Quantifier Responses
title_fullStr Numeric Estimation and Response Options: An Examination of the Accuracy of Numeric and Vague Quantifier Responses
title_full_unstemmed Numeric Estimation and Response Options: An Examination of the Accuracy of Numeric and Vague Quantifier Responses
title_sort numeric estimation and response options: an examination of the accuracy of numeric and vague quantifier responses
publisher University of Arizona Libraries
series Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences
issn 2159-7855
publishDate 2014-02-01
description Many survey questions ask respondents to provide responses that contain quantitative information, often using either numeric open-ended responses or vague quantifier scales. Generally, survey researchers have argued against the use of vague quantifier scales. However, no study has compared accuracy between vague quantifiers and numeric open-ended responses. This study is the first to do so, using a unique data set created through an experiment. 124 participants studied word lists of paired words, where the experiment employed a 2 (context) x 2 (response form) x 6 (actual frequency) factorial design, with the context and form factors manipulated between subjects, and the frequency factor manipulated within subjects. The two conditions for the context factor are same-context and different-context conditions where the context word either was the same or different for each presentation of the target word. The other between subject factor was response form, where participants responded to a recall test using either vague quantifiers or numeric open-ended responses. Translations of vague quantifiers were obtained and used in accuracy tests. Finally, a numeracy test was administered to collect information about respondent numeracy. Different accuracy measures are estimated and analyzed. Results show context memory did not have a significant effect. Numeracy has an effect, but the direction depends on form and context. Actual frequency had a significant effect on accuracy, but did not interact with other variables. Importantly, results suggest vague quantifiers tend to improve accuracy more often relative to numeric open-ended response.   DOI:10.2458/azu_jmmss_v5i2_Al_baghal
topic response options
numeric cognition
vague quantifiers
recall
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jmmss/article/view/18476
work_keys_str_mv AT tarekalbaghal numericestimationandresponseoptionsanexaminationoftheaccuracyofnumericandvaguequantifierresponses
_version_ 1724675953344380928