Size composition and length-weight relationships of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Bone Bay

The size composition, length-weight relationship, and condition factor of Thunnus albacares were examined in Bone Bay. Sampling was conducted at two stations, i.e., Station I at Cimpu in Luwu Regency and Station II at Lonrae in Bone Regency between July 2018 and June 2019. 10246 and 2651 yellowfin t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jalil, Mallawa Achmar, Amir Faisal, Safruddin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/13/e3sconf_corectijjss2020_01006.pdf
id doaj-67e76a5b13e74ae9a69a5b8b4952d7a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67e76a5b13e74ae9a69a5b8b4952d7a82021-04-02T12:19:32ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-011530100610.1051/e3sconf/202015301006e3sconf_corectijjss2020_01006Size composition and length-weight relationships of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Bone BayJalilMallawa Achmar0Amir Faisal1Safruddin2Marine Science and Fisheries Faculty of Hasanuddin UniversityMarine Science and Fisheries Faculty of Hasanuddin UniversityMarine Science and Fisheries Faculty of Hasanuddin UniversityThe size composition, length-weight relationship, and condition factor of Thunnus albacares were examined in Bone Bay. Sampling was conducted at two stations, i.e., Station I at Cimpu in Luwu Regency and Station II at Lonrae in Bone Regency between July 2018 and June 2019. 10246 and 2651 yellowfin tunas were captured in Station I and Station II, respectively. Measurement of the fork length ranged between 20 cm and 192 cm with an average length of 81,257 ± 33,456 cm in Station I, and between 26 to 162 cm with an average length of 95,479 cm in Station II. The weight measurement ranged between 0,35 and 99,21 kg with an average of 14,539 kg in Station I, and between 0,46 and 97,35 kg with an average of 26,978 kg in Station II. Calculation of the relationship was based on the formula W= 5,5−5FL2,7454 (R2 = 0,963) in Station I, and W=4,1−5FL2,9103 (R2 = 0,761) in Station II. The values of condition factor at Station I and Station II were 2,1395 and 3,4374, respectively. It is quite evident that the growth pattern of the yellowfin tunas at Bone Bay was negatively allometric, indicating that the length increased faster than the weight.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/13/e3sconf_corectijjss2020_01006.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jalil
Mallawa Achmar
Amir Faisal
Safruddin
spellingShingle Jalil
Mallawa Achmar
Amir Faisal
Safruddin
Size composition and length-weight relationships of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Bone Bay
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Jalil
Mallawa Achmar
Amir Faisal
Safruddin
author_sort Jalil
title Size composition and length-weight relationships of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Bone Bay
title_short Size composition and length-weight relationships of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Bone Bay
title_full Size composition and length-weight relationships of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Bone Bay
title_fullStr Size composition and length-weight relationships of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Bone Bay
title_full_unstemmed Size composition and length-weight relationships of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Bone Bay
title_sort size composition and length-weight relationships of the yellowfin tuna (thunnus albacares) in bone bay
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The size composition, length-weight relationship, and condition factor of Thunnus albacares were examined in Bone Bay. Sampling was conducted at two stations, i.e., Station I at Cimpu in Luwu Regency and Station II at Lonrae in Bone Regency between July 2018 and June 2019. 10246 and 2651 yellowfin tunas were captured in Station I and Station II, respectively. Measurement of the fork length ranged between 20 cm and 192 cm with an average length of 81,257 ± 33,456 cm in Station I, and between 26 to 162 cm with an average length of 95,479 cm in Station II. The weight measurement ranged between 0,35 and 99,21 kg with an average of 14,539 kg in Station I, and between 0,46 and 97,35 kg with an average of 26,978 kg in Station II. Calculation of the relationship was based on the formula W= 5,5−5FL2,7454 (R2 = 0,963) in Station I, and W=4,1−5FL2,9103 (R2 = 0,761) in Station II. The values of condition factor at Station I and Station II were 2,1395 and 3,4374, respectively. It is quite evident that the growth pattern of the yellowfin tunas at Bone Bay was negatively allometric, indicating that the length increased faster than the weight.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/13/e3sconf_corectijjss2020_01006.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jalil sizecompositionandlengthweightrelationshipsoftheyellowfintunathunnusalbacaresinbonebay
AT mallawaachmar sizecompositionandlengthweightrelationshipsoftheyellowfintunathunnusalbacaresinbonebay
AT amirfaisal sizecompositionandlengthweightrelationshipsoftheyellowfintunathunnusalbacaresinbonebay
AT safruddin sizecompositionandlengthweightrelationshipsoftheyellowfintunathunnusalbacaresinbonebay
_version_ 1721569472960004096