A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Cost-effectiveness analysis is widely adopted as an analytical framework to evaluate whether health care interventions represent value for money, and its use in dentistry is increasing. Traditionally, in cost-effectiveness analysis, one assumes that the decision maker’s maximum willingness to pay (W...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Healthcare |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/3/301 |
id |
doaj-67e207db660c40b19f80ace955b5d95d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-67e207db660c40b19f80ace955b5d95d2020-11-25T03:51:32ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322020-08-01830130110.3390/healthcare8030301A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisPedram Sendi0Arta Ramadani1Nicola U. Zitzmann2Michael M. Bornstein3Department of Oral Health and Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Oral Health and Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Oral Health and Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandCost-effectiveness analysis is widely adopted as an analytical framework to evaluate whether health care interventions represent value for money, and its use in dentistry is increasing. Traditionally, in cost-effectiveness analysis, one assumes that the decision maker’s maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for health gain is equivalent to his minimum willingness to accept (WTA) monetary compensation for health loss. It has been documented in the literature that losses are weighted higher than equivalent gains, i.e., that WTA exceeds WTP for the same health condition, resulting in a WTA/WTP ratio greater than 1. There is a knowledge gap of published WTA/WTP ratios for dental interventions in the literature. We therefore conducted a (i) systematic review of published WTA-WTP estimates in dentistry (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, London, UK) and (ii) a patient-level analysis of WTA/WTP ratios of included studies, and (iii) we demonstrate the impact of a WTA-WTP disparity on cost-effectiveness analysis. Out of 55 eligible studies, two studies were included in our review. The WTA/WTP ratio ranged from 2.58 for discontinuing water fluoridation to 5.12 for mandibular implant overdentures, indicating a higher disparity for implant rehabilitations than for dental public health interventions. A WTA-WTP disparity inflates the cost-effectiveness of dental interventions when there is a substantial risk of both lower costs and health outcomes. We therefore recommend that in these cases the results of cost-effectiveness analyses are reported using different WTA/WTP ratios in a sensitivity analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/3/301health services researcheconomic evaluationpublic healthdental implantswater fluoridationdentistry |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pedram Sendi Arta Ramadani Nicola U. Zitzmann Michael M. Bornstein |
spellingShingle |
Pedram Sendi Arta Ramadani Nicola U. Zitzmann Michael M. Bornstein A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Healthcare health services research economic evaluation public health dental implants water fluoridation dentistry |
author_facet |
Pedram Sendi Arta Ramadani Nicola U. Zitzmann Michael M. Bornstein |
author_sort |
Pedram Sendi |
title |
A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_short |
A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full |
A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_fullStr |
A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_sort |
systematic review of wta-wtp disparity for dental interventions and implications for cost-effectiveness analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Healthcare |
issn |
2227-9032 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Cost-effectiveness analysis is widely adopted as an analytical framework to evaluate whether health care interventions represent value for money, and its use in dentistry is increasing. Traditionally, in cost-effectiveness analysis, one assumes that the decision maker’s maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for health gain is equivalent to his minimum willingness to accept (WTA) monetary compensation for health loss. It has been documented in the literature that losses are weighted higher than equivalent gains, i.e., that WTA exceeds WTP for the same health condition, resulting in a WTA/WTP ratio greater than 1. There is a knowledge gap of published WTA/WTP ratios for dental interventions in the literature. We therefore conducted a (i) systematic review of published WTA-WTP estimates in dentistry (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, London, UK) and (ii) a patient-level analysis of WTA/WTP ratios of included studies, and (iii) we demonstrate the impact of a WTA-WTP disparity on cost-effectiveness analysis. Out of 55 eligible studies, two studies were included in our review. The WTA/WTP ratio ranged from 2.58 for discontinuing water fluoridation to 5.12 for mandibular implant overdentures, indicating a higher disparity for implant rehabilitations than for dental public health interventions. A WTA-WTP disparity inflates the cost-effectiveness of dental interventions when there is a substantial risk of both lower costs and health outcomes. We therefore recommend that in these cases the results of cost-effectiveness analyses are reported using different WTA/WTP ratios in a sensitivity analysis. |
topic |
health services research economic evaluation public health dental implants water fluoridation dentistry |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/3/301 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pedramsendi asystematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT artaramadani asystematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT nicolauzitzmann asystematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT michaelmbornstein asystematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT pedramsendi systematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT artaramadani systematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT nicolauzitzmann systematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT michaelmbornstein systematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis |
_version_ |
1724487083598282752 |