A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Cost-effectiveness analysis is widely adopted as an analytical framework to evaluate whether health care interventions represent value for money, and its use in dentistry is increasing. Traditionally, in cost-effectiveness analysis, one assumes that the decision maker’s maximum willingness to pay (W...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedram Sendi, Arta Ramadani, Nicola U. Zitzmann, Michael M. Bornstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/3/301
id doaj-67e207db660c40b19f80ace955b5d95d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67e207db660c40b19f80ace955b5d95d2020-11-25T03:51:32ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322020-08-01830130110.3390/healthcare8030301A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisPedram Sendi0Arta Ramadani1Nicola U. Zitzmann2Michael M. Bornstein3Department of Oral Health and Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Oral Health and Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Oral Health and Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandCost-effectiveness analysis is widely adopted as an analytical framework to evaluate whether health care interventions represent value for money, and its use in dentistry is increasing. Traditionally, in cost-effectiveness analysis, one assumes that the decision maker’s maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for health gain is equivalent to his minimum willingness to accept (WTA) monetary compensation for health loss. It has been documented in the literature that losses are weighted higher than equivalent gains, i.e., that WTA exceeds WTP for the same health condition, resulting in a WTA/WTP ratio greater than 1. There is a knowledge gap of published WTA/WTP ratios for dental interventions in the literature. We therefore conducted a (i) systematic review of published WTA-WTP estimates in dentistry (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, London, UK) and (ii) a patient-level analysis of WTA/WTP ratios of included studies, and (iii) we demonstrate the impact of a WTA-WTP disparity on cost-effectiveness analysis. Out of 55 eligible studies, two studies were included in our review. The WTA/WTP ratio ranged from 2.58 for discontinuing water fluoridation to 5.12 for mandibular implant overdentures, indicating a higher disparity for implant rehabilitations than for dental public health interventions. A WTA-WTP disparity inflates the cost-effectiveness of dental interventions when there is a substantial risk of both lower costs and health outcomes. We therefore recommend that in these cases the results of cost-effectiveness analyses are reported using different WTA/WTP ratios in a sensitivity analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/3/301health services researcheconomic evaluationpublic healthdental implantswater fluoridationdentistry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pedram Sendi
Arta Ramadani
Nicola U. Zitzmann
Michael M. Bornstein
spellingShingle Pedram Sendi
Arta Ramadani
Nicola U. Zitzmann
Michael M. Bornstein
A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Healthcare
health services research
economic evaluation
public health
dental implants
water fluoridation
dentistry
author_facet Pedram Sendi
Arta Ramadani
Nicola U. Zitzmann
Michael M. Bornstein
author_sort Pedram Sendi
title A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of WTA-WTP Disparity for Dental Interventions and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort systematic review of wta-wtp disparity for dental interventions and implications for cost-effectiveness analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Healthcare
issn 2227-9032
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Cost-effectiveness analysis is widely adopted as an analytical framework to evaluate whether health care interventions represent value for money, and its use in dentistry is increasing. Traditionally, in cost-effectiveness analysis, one assumes that the decision maker’s maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for health gain is equivalent to his minimum willingness to accept (WTA) monetary compensation for health loss. It has been documented in the literature that losses are weighted higher than equivalent gains, i.e., that WTA exceeds WTP for the same health condition, resulting in a WTA/WTP ratio greater than 1. There is a knowledge gap of published WTA/WTP ratios for dental interventions in the literature. We therefore conducted a (i) systematic review of published WTA-WTP estimates in dentistry (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, London, UK) and (ii) a patient-level analysis of WTA/WTP ratios of included studies, and (iii) we demonstrate the impact of a WTA-WTP disparity on cost-effectiveness analysis. Out of 55 eligible studies, two studies were included in our review. The WTA/WTP ratio ranged from 2.58 for discontinuing water fluoridation to 5.12 for mandibular implant overdentures, indicating a higher disparity for implant rehabilitations than for dental public health interventions. A WTA-WTP disparity inflates the cost-effectiveness of dental interventions when there is a substantial risk of both lower costs and health outcomes. We therefore recommend that in these cases the results of cost-effectiveness analyses are reported using different WTA/WTP ratios in a sensitivity analysis.
topic health services research
economic evaluation
public health
dental implants
water fluoridation
dentistry
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/3/301
work_keys_str_mv AT pedramsendi asystematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT artaramadani asystematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT nicolauzitzmann asystematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT michaelmbornstein asystematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT pedramsendi systematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT artaramadani systematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT nicolauzitzmann systematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT michaelmbornstein systematicreviewofwtawtpdisparityfordentalinterventionsandimplicationsforcosteffectivenessanalysis
_version_ 1724487083598282752