Buddhist Ritual from Syntax to Cognition: Insight Meditation and Homa
The concept of “ritual syntax” is developed by relating it to cognitive studies of ritual, providing a fuller theoretical basis. Developing theoretical grounding requires differentiating between the members of five pairs of concepts: production is not the same as analysis, syntax is not the same as...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-08-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/8/104 |
id |
doaj-67ca620fbd294577a2ff68574e19972b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-67ca620fbd294577a2ff68574e19972b2020-11-24T23:04:22ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442016-08-017810410.3390/rel7080104rel7080104Buddhist Ritual from Syntax to Cognition: Insight Meditation and HomaRichard K. Payne0Institute of Buddhist Studies at the Graduate Theological Union, 2140 Durant Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94704, USAThe concept of “ritual syntax” is developed by relating it to cognitive studies of ritual, providing a fuller theoretical basis. Developing theoretical grounding requires differentiating between the members of five pairs of concepts: production is not the same as analysis, syntax is not the same as semantics, ritual is not the same as the mental, cognition is not the same as the mental, and syntax is not the same as language. These distinctions help avoid overly strong interpretations of the analogy between ritual and language. A discussion of “ritual” suggests that it is best conceptualized in terms of multiple scalar characteristics with degrees of ritualization. Two Buddhist practices, insight meditation and homa, are introduced as instances for the cognitive study of ritual. Syntax involves not simply ordering of elements, but also hierarchical organization of those elements. While syntax allows sentential elements to move within a sentence, ritual tends toward invariance. Invariance seems to contradict the claim that ritual is syntactically organized. However, rituals are often modeled on ordinary activities, producing a kind of “semantic” motivation for invariance.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/8/104ritualtantrasyntaxsemanticscognitive linguisticsembodied cognitioninsight meditationhomaFrits Staalritual invariance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Richard K. Payne |
spellingShingle |
Richard K. Payne Buddhist Ritual from Syntax to Cognition: Insight Meditation and Homa Religions ritual tantra syntax semantics cognitive linguistics embodied cognition insight meditation homa Frits Staal ritual invariance |
author_facet |
Richard K. Payne |
author_sort |
Richard K. Payne |
title |
Buddhist Ritual from Syntax to Cognition: Insight Meditation and Homa |
title_short |
Buddhist Ritual from Syntax to Cognition: Insight Meditation and Homa |
title_full |
Buddhist Ritual from Syntax to Cognition: Insight Meditation and Homa |
title_fullStr |
Buddhist Ritual from Syntax to Cognition: Insight Meditation and Homa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Buddhist Ritual from Syntax to Cognition: Insight Meditation and Homa |
title_sort |
buddhist ritual from syntax to cognition: insight meditation and homa |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2016-08-01 |
description |
The concept of “ritual syntax” is developed by relating it to cognitive studies of ritual, providing a fuller theoretical basis. Developing theoretical grounding requires differentiating between the members of five pairs of concepts: production is not the same as analysis, syntax is not the same as semantics, ritual is not the same as the mental, cognition is not the same as the mental, and syntax is not the same as language. These distinctions help avoid overly strong interpretations of the analogy between ritual and language. A discussion of “ritual” suggests that it is best conceptualized in terms of multiple scalar characteristics with degrees of ritualization. Two Buddhist practices, insight meditation and homa, are introduced as instances for the cognitive study of ritual. Syntax involves not simply ordering of elements, but also hierarchical organization of those elements. While syntax allows sentential elements to move within a sentence, ritual tends toward invariance. Invariance seems to contradict the claim that ritual is syntactically organized. However, rituals are often modeled on ordinary activities, producing a kind of “semantic” motivation for invariance. |
topic |
ritual tantra syntax semantics cognitive linguistics embodied cognition insight meditation homa Frits Staal ritual invariance |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/8/104 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT richardkpayne buddhistritualfromsyntaxtocognitioninsightmeditationandhoma |
_version_ |
1725630973780951040 |