Supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methods

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Over the course of the last few years there has been a significant amount of research performed on ontology-based formalization of phenotype descriptions. In order to fully capture the intrinsic value and knowledge expressed within t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Groza Tudor, Hunter Jane, Zankl Andreas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-10-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/265
id doaj-67c623e425a149ddb4b81fd4c36082d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67c623e425a149ddb4b81fd4c36082d52020-11-24T23:55:59ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052012-10-0113126510.1186/1471-2105-13-265Supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methodsGroza TudorHunter JaneZankl Andreas<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Over the course of the last few years there has been a significant amount of research performed on ontology-based formalization of phenotype descriptions. In order to fully capture the intrinsic value and knowledge expressed within them, we need to take advantage of their inner structure, which implicitly combines qualities and anatomical entities. The first step in this process is the segmentation of the phenotype descriptions into their atomic elements.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We present a two-phase hybrid segmentation method that combines a series individual classifiers using different aggregation schemes (set operations and simple majority voting). The approach is tested on a corpus comprised of skeletal phenotype descriptions emerged from the Human Phenotype Ontology. Experimental results show that the best hybrid method achieves an F-Score of 97.05% in the first phase and F-Scores of 97.16% / 94.50% in the second phase.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The performance of the initial segmentation of anatomical entities and qualities (phase I) is not affected by the presence / absence of external resources, such as domain dictionaries. From a generic perspective, hybrid methods may not always improve the segmentation accuracy as they are heavily dependent on the goal and data characteristics.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/265
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Groza Tudor
Hunter Jane
Zankl Andreas
spellingShingle Groza Tudor
Hunter Jane
Zankl Andreas
Supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methods
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Groza Tudor
Hunter Jane
Zankl Andreas
author_sort Groza Tudor
title Supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methods
title_short Supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methods
title_full Supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methods
title_fullStr Supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methods
title_full_unstemmed Supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methods
title_sort supervised segmentation of phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome using hybrid methods
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2012-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Over the course of the last few years there has been a significant amount of research performed on ontology-based formalization of phenotype descriptions. In order to fully capture the intrinsic value and knowledge expressed within them, we need to take advantage of their inner structure, which implicitly combines qualities and anatomical entities. The first step in this process is the segmentation of the phenotype descriptions into their atomic elements.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We present a two-phase hybrid segmentation method that combines a series individual classifiers using different aggregation schemes (set operations and simple majority voting). The approach is tested on a corpus comprised of skeletal phenotype descriptions emerged from the Human Phenotype Ontology. Experimental results show that the best hybrid method achieves an F-Score of 97.05% in the first phase and F-Scores of 97.16% / 94.50% in the second phase.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The performance of the initial segmentation of anatomical entities and qualities (phase I) is not affected by the presence / absence of external resources, such as domain dictionaries. From a generic perspective, hybrid methods may not always improve the segmentation accuracy as they are heavily dependent on the goal and data characteristics.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/265
work_keys_str_mv AT grozatudor supervisedsegmentationofphenotypedescriptionsforthehumanskeletalphenomeusinghybridmethods
AT hunterjane supervisedsegmentationofphenotypedescriptionsforthehumanskeletalphenomeusinghybridmethods
AT zanklandreas supervisedsegmentationofphenotypedescriptionsforthehumanskeletalphenomeusinghybridmethods
_version_ 1725460261967495168