Effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafers

Thin (100) wafers of single crystal undoped InSb have been strength tested by plane transverse bending. The strength of the wafers (≤ 800 mm in thickness) has been shown to depend on their mechanical treatment type. If the full mechanical treatment cycle is used (grinding + chemical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svetlana S. Kormilitsina, Elena V. Molodtsova, Stanislav N. Knyzev, Roman Yu. Kozlov, Dmitry A. Zavrazhin, Elena V. Zharikova, Yuri V. Syrov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2020-12-01
Series:Modern Electronic Materials
Online Access:https://moem.pensoft.net/article/64991/download/pdf/
id doaj-67bf523b36b24853a97193a5a8f0976d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67bf523b36b24853a97193a5a8f0976d2021-04-05T16:12:04ZengPensoft PublishersModern Electronic Materials2452-17792020-12-016414715310.3897/j.moem.6.4.6499164991Effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafersSvetlana S. Kormilitsina0Elena V. Molodtsova1Stanislav N. Knyzev2Roman Yu. Kozlov3Dmitry A. Zavrazhin4Elena V. Zharikova5Yuri V. Syrov6Federal State Research and Develpment Institute of Rare Metal Industry (Giredmet JSC) Federal State Research and Develpment Institute of Rare Metal Industry (Giredmet JSC)Federal State Research and Develpment Institute of Rare Metal Industry (Giredmet JSC) Federal State Research and Develpment Institute of Rare Metal Industry (Giredmet JSC) Federal State Research and Develpment Institute of Rare Metal Industry (Giredmet JSC)Federal State Research and Develpment Institute of Rare Metal Industry (Giredmet JSC) MIREA – Russian Technological University Thin (100) wafers of single crystal undoped InSb have been strength tested by plane transverse bending. The strength of the wafers (≤ 800 mm in thickness) has been shown to depend on their mechanical treatment type. If the full mechanical treatment cycle is used (grinding + chemical polishing) the strength of the InSb wafers increases twofold (from 3.0 to 6.4 kg/mm2). We show that the strength dependence on mechanical treatment type for (100) wafers is similar to that for (111) wafers, the strength of (111) wafers being 2 times higher. The roughness of the thin wafers after the full mechanical treatment cycle has been measured using contact profilometry. After the full mechanical treatment cycle the roughness of the InSb wafers Ra decreases from 0.6 to 0.04 mm leading to general surface smoothening. We have compared the strength and roughness between (100) InSb and GaAs wafers. The roughness of InSb and GaAs wafers after the full mechanical treatment cycle decreases significantly: by 10 times for InSb due to the general surface smoothening and by 3 times for GaAs (Rz from 2.4 to 0.8 mm) due to a reduction of the peak roughness component. The full mechanical treatment cycle increases the strength of InSb wafers by removing damaged layers through the sequence of operations and reducing the risk of mechanical damage development. https://moem.pensoft.net/article/64991/download/pdf/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Svetlana S. Kormilitsina
Elena V. Molodtsova
Stanislav N. Knyzev
Roman Yu. Kozlov
Dmitry A. Zavrazhin
Elena V. Zharikova
Yuri V. Syrov
spellingShingle Svetlana S. Kormilitsina
Elena V. Molodtsova
Stanislav N. Knyzev
Roman Yu. Kozlov
Dmitry A. Zavrazhin
Elena V. Zharikova
Yuri V. Syrov
Effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafers
Modern Electronic Materials
author_facet Svetlana S. Kormilitsina
Elena V. Molodtsova
Stanislav N. Knyzev
Roman Yu. Kozlov
Dmitry A. Zavrazhin
Elena V. Zharikova
Yuri V. Syrov
author_sort Svetlana S. Kormilitsina
title Effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafers
title_short Effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafers
title_full Effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafers
title_fullStr Effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafers
title_full_unstemmed Effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafers
title_sort effect of mechanical treatment type on the strength of undoped single crystal indium antimonide wafers
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Modern Electronic Materials
issn 2452-1779
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Thin (100) wafers of single crystal undoped InSb have been strength tested by plane transverse bending. The strength of the wafers (≤ 800 mm in thickness) has been shown to depend on their mechanical treatment type. If the full mechanical treatment cycle is used (grinding + chemical polishing) the strength of the InSb wafers increases twofold (from 3.0 to 6.4 kg/mm2). We show that the strength dependence on mechanical treatment type for (100) wafers is similar to that for (111) wafers, the strength of (111) wafers being 2 times higher. The roughness of the thin wafers after the full mechanical treatment cycle has been measured using contact profilometry. After the full mechanical treatment cycle the roughness of the InSb wafers Ra decreases from 0.6 to 0.04 mm leading to general surface smoothening. We have compared the strength and roughness between (100) InSb and GaAs wafers. The roughness of InSb and GaAs wafers after the full mechanical treatment cycle decreases significantly: by 10 times for InSb due to the general surface smoothening and by 3 times for GaAs (Rz from 2.4 to 0.8 mm) due to a reduction of the peak roughness component. The full mechanical treatment cycle increases the strength of InSb wafers by removing damaged layers through the sequence of operations and reducing the risk of mechanical damage development.
url https://moem.pensoft.net/article/64991/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT svetlanaskormilitsina effectofmechanicaltreatmenttypeonthestrengthofundopedsinglecrystalindiumantimonidewafers
AT elenavmolodtsova effectofmechanicaltreatmenttypeonthestrengthofundopedsinglecrystalindiumantimonidewafers
AT stanislavnknyzev effectofmechanicaltreatmenttypeonthestrengthofundopedsinglecrystalindiumantimonidewafers
AT romanyukozlov effectofmechanicaltreatmenttypeonthestrengthofundopedsinglecrystalindiumantimonidewafers
AT dmitryazavrazhin effectofmechanicaltreatmenttypeonthestrengthofundopedsinglecrystalindiumantimonidewafers
AT elenavzharikova effectofmechanicaltreatmenttypeonthestrengthofundopedsinglecrystalindiumantimonidewafers
AT yurivsyrov effectofmechanicaltreatmenttypeonthestrengthofundopedsinglecrystalindiumantimonidewafers
_version_ 1721540722654445568