Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study

Purpose: Hounsfield unit (HU) provides a quantitative evaluation of bone density. The assessment of bone density is essential for successful treatment plan. Although, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is considered as gold standard in evaluating bone density, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanjana Patrick, N Praveen Birur, Keerthi Gurushanth, A Shubhasini Raghavan, Shubha Gurudath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2017;volume=28;issue=1;spage=66;epage=70;aulast=Patrick
id doaj-67af83769ac3424585b30afc60698303
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67af83769ac3424585b30afc606983032020-11-24T23:16:39ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032017-01-01281667010.4103/ijdr.IJDR_415_16Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro studySanjana PatrickN Praveen BirurKeerthi GurushanthA Shubhasini RaghavanShubha GurudathPurpose: Hounsfield unit (HU) provides a quantitative evaluation of bone density. The assessment of bone density is essential for successful treatment plan. Although, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is considered as gold standard in evaluating bone density, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is frequently used in dentomaxillofacial imaging due to lower radiation dose, less complex device, and images with satisfactory resolution. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine and compare the gray value and HU value of hypodense and hyperdense structures on CBCT and MSCT, respectively. The study also evaluated and compared the gray values in different field of views within CBCT. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 dry human mandibles were obtained. The gray values and HU values of hypodense structures (extraction socket, inferior alveolar canal, and mental foramen) and hyperdense structures (enamel, cancellous, and cortical bone) were evaluated and compared between CBCT and MSCT images, respectively. The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Statistical Analysis: One-way analyses of variance, ANOVA F-test. Results: The gray value for hypodense structures in large volume CBCT scans resembled the HU value. The study showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in gray values for all the hyperdense structures in CBCT when compared to HU values of MSCT scans. Conclusion: The gray value for hypodense structures in large volume CBCT scan was more reliable and analogous to HU value in MSCT. The determination of grey values in CBCT may not be as accurate as HU value in CT for hyperdense structures.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2017;volume=28;issue=1;spage=66;epage=70;aulast=PatrickComputed tomographycone beam computed tomographyfield of viewHounsfield units
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sanjana Patrick
N Praveen Birur
Keerthi Gurushanth
A Shubhasini Raghavan
Shubha Gurudath
spellingShingle Sanjana Patrick
N Praveen Birur
Keerthi Gurushanth
A Shubhasini Raghavan
Shubha Gurudath
Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Computed tomography
cone beam computed tomography
field of view
Hounsfield units
author_facet Sanjana Patrick
N Praveen Birur
Keerthi Gurushanth
A Shubhasini Raghavan
Shubha Gurudath
author_sort Sanjana Patrick
title Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: an in vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Purpose: Hounsfield unit (HU) provides a quantitative evaluation of bone density. The assessment of bone density is essential for successful treatment plan. Although, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is considered as gold standard in evaluating bone density, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is frequently used in dentomaxillofacial imaging due to lower radiation dose, less complex device, and images with satisfactory resolution. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine and compare the gray value and HU value of hypodense and hyperdense structures on CBCT and MSCT, respectively. The study also evaluated and compared the gray values in different field of views within CBCT. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 dry human mandibles were obtained. The gray values and HU values of hypodense structures (extraction socket, inferior alveolar canal, and mental foramen) and hyperdense structures (enamel, cancellous, and cortical bone) were evaluated and compared between CBCT and MSCT images, respectively. The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Statistical Analysis: One-way analyses of variance, ANOVA F-test. Results: The gray value for hypodense structures in large volume CBCT scans resembled the HU value. The study showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in gray values for all the hyperdense structures in CBCT when compared to HU values of MSCT scans. Conclusion: The gray value for hypodense structures in large volume CBCT scan was more reliable and analogous to HU value in MSCT. The determination of grey values in CBCT may not be as accurate as HU value in CT for hyperdense structures.
topic Computed tomography
cone beam computed tomography
field of view
Hounsfield units
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2017;volume=28;issue=1;spage=66;epage=70;aulast=Patrick
work_keys_str_mv AT sanjanapatrick comparisonofgrayvaluesofconebeamcomputedtomographywithhounsfieldunitsofmultislicecomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT npraveenbirur comparisonofgrayvaluesofconebeamcomputedtomographywithhounsfieldunitsofmultislicecomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT keerthigurushanth comparisonofgrayvaluesofconebeamcomputedtomographywithhounsfieldunitsofmultislicecomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT ashubhasiniraghavan comparisonofgrayvaluesofconebeamcomputedtomographywithhounsfieldunitsofmultislicecomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT shubhagurudath comparisonofgrayvaluesofconebeamcomputedtomographywithhounsfieldunitsofmultislicecomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1725586387717062656