Assessing the healthiness of UK food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.

<h4>Background</h4>The provision and over-consumption of foods high in energy, saturated fat, free sugars or salt are important risk factors for poor diet and ill-health. In the UK, policies seek to drive improvement through voluntary reformulation of single nutrients in key food groups....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren Kate Bandy, Sven Hollowell, Richard Harrington, Peter Scarborough, Susan Jebb, Mike Rayner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254833
id doaj-678e59855e7e43ecae6b72d05d4c04b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-678e59855e7e43ecae6b72d05d4c04b72021-08-10T04:31:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01168e025483310.1371/journal.pone.0254833Assessing the healthiness of UK food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.Lauren Kate BandySven HollowellRichard HarringtonPeter ScarboroughSusan JebbMike Rayner<h4>Background</h4>The provision and over-consumption of foods high in energy, saturated fat, free sugars or salt are important risk factors for poor diet and ill-health. In the UK, policies seek to drive improvement through voluntary reformulation of single nutrients in key food groups. There has been little consideration of the overall progress by individual companies. This study assesses recent changes in the nutrient profile of brands and products sold by the top 10 food and beverage companies in the UK.<h4>Methods</h4>The FSA/Ofcom nutrient profile model was applied to the nutrient composition data for all products manufactured by the top 10 food and beverage companies and weighted by volume sales. The mean nutrient profiling score, on a scale of 1-100 with thresholds for healthy products being 62 for foods and 68 for drinks, was used to rank companies and food categories between 2015 and 2018, and to calculate the proportion of individual products and sales that are considered by the UK Government to be healthy.<h4>Results</h4>Between 2015 and 2018 there was little change in the sales-weighted nutrient profiling score of the top 10 companies (49 to 51; p = 0.28) or the proportion of products classified as healthy (46% to 48%; p = 0.23). Of the top five brands sold by each of the ten companies, only six brands among ten companies improved their nutrient profiling score by 20% or more. The proportion of total volume sales classified as healthy increased from 44% to 51% (p = 0.07) driven by an increase in the volume sales of bottled water, low/no calorie carbonates and juices, but after removing soft drinks, the proportion of foods classified as healthy decreased from 7% to 6% (p = 33).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The UK voluntary reformulation policies, setting targets for reductions in calories, sugar and salt, do not appear to have led to significant changes in the nutritional quality of foods, though there has been progress in soft drinks where the soft drink industry levy also applies. Further policy action is needed to incentivise companies to make more substantive changes in product composition to support consumers to achieve a healthier diet.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254833
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lauren Kate Bandy
Sven Hollowell
Richard Harrington
Peter Scarborough
Susan Jebb
Mike Rayner
spellingShingle Lauren Kate Bandy
Sven Hollowell
Richard Harrington
Peter Scarborough
Susan Jebb
Mike Rayner
Assessing the healthiness of UK food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lauren Kate Bandy
Sven Hollowell
Richard Harrington
Peter Scarborough
Susan Jebb
Mike Rayner
author_sort Lauren Kate Bandy
title Assessing the healthiness of UK food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.
title_short Assessing the healthiness of UK food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.
title_full Assessing the healthiness of UK food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.
title_fullStr Assessing the healthiness of UK food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the healthiness of UK food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.
title_sort assessing the healthiness of uk food companies' product portfolios using food sales and nutrient composition data.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>The provision and over-consumption of foods high in energy, saturated fat, free sugars or salt are important risk factors for poor diet and ill-health. In the UK, policies seek to drive improvement through voluntary reformulation of single nutrients in key food groups. There has been little consideration of the overall progress by individual companies. This study assesses recent changes in the nutrient profile of brands and products sold by the top 10 food and beverage companies in the UK.<h4>Methods</h4>The FSA/Ofcom nutrient profile model was applied to the nutrient composition data for all products manufactured by the top 10 food and beverage companies and weighted by volume sales. The mean nutrient profiling score, on a scale of 1-100 with thresholds for healthy products being 62 for foods and 68 for drinks, was used to rank companies and food categories between 2015 and 2018, and to calculate the proportion of individual products and sales that are considered by the UK Government to be healthy.<h4>Results</h4>Between 2015 and 2018 there was little change in the sales-weighted nutrient profiling score of the top 10 companies (49 to 51; p = 0.28) or the proportion of products classified as healthy (46% to 48%; p = 0.23). Of the top five brands sold by each of the ten companies, only six brands among ten companies improved their nutrient profiling score by 20% or more. The proportion of total volume sales classified as healthy increased from 44% to 51% (p = 0.07) driven by an increase in the volume sales of bottled water, low/no calorie carbonates and juices, but after removing soft drinks, the proportion of foods classified as healthy decreased from 7% to 6% (p = 33).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The UK voluntary reformulation policies, setting targets for reductions in calories, sugar and salt, do not appear to have led to significant changes in the nutritional quality of foods, though there has been progress in soft drinks where the soft drink industry levy also applies. Further policy action is needed to incentivise companies to make more substantive changes in product composition to support consumers to achieve a healthier diet.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254833
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenkatebandy assessingthehealthinessofukfoodcompaniesproductportfoliosusingfoodsalesandnutrientcompositiondata
AT svenhollowell assessingthehealthinessofukfoodcompaniesproductportfoliosusingfoodsalesandnutrientcompositiondata
AT richardharrington assessingthehealthinessofukfoodcompaniesproductportfoliosusingfoodsalesandnutrientcompositiondata
AT peterscarborough assessingthehealthinessofukfoodcompaniesproductportfoliosusingfoodsalesandnutrientcompositiondata
AT susanjebb assessingthehealthinessofukfoodcompaniesproductportfoliosusingfoodsalesandnutrientcompositiondata
AT mikerayner assessingthehealthinessofukfoodcompaniesproductportfoliosusingfoodsalesandnutrientcompositiondata
_version_ 1721212887687495680