Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision

Abstract The ability to estimate the distance of objects from one’s self and from each other is fundamental to a variety of behaviours from grasping objects to navigating. The main cue to distance, stereopsis, relies on the slight offsets between the images derived from our left and right eyes, also...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrien Chopin, Dennis M. Levi, Daphné Bavelier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03425-1
id doaj-6777776c3a6d4279855d697ba269c001
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6777776c3a6d4279855d697ba269c0012020-12-08T00:34:00ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-06-01711710.1038/s41598-017-03425-1Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic visionAdrien Chopin0Dennis M. Levi1Daphné Bavelier2Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, CNRS, Département d’études cognitives, Laboratoire des Systèmes PerceptifsSchool of Optometry, and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, BerkeleyFaculty of Psychology and Educational Science, University of GenevaAbstract The ability to estimate the distance of objects from one’s self and from each other is fundamental to a variety of behaviours from grasping objects to navigating. The main cue to distance, stereopsis, relies on the slight offsets between the images derived from our left and right eyes, also termed disparities. Here we ask whether the precision of stereopsis varies with professional experience with precise manual tasks. We measured stereo-acuities of dressmakers and non-dressmakers for both absolute and relative disparities. We used a stereoscope and a computerized test removing monocular cues. We also measured vergence noise and bias using the Nonius line technique. We demonstrate that dressmakers’ stereoscopic acuities are better than those of non-dressmakers, for both absolute and relative disparities. In contrast, vergence noise and bias were comparable in the two groups. Two non-exclusive mechanisms may be at the source of the group difference we document: (i) self-selection or the fact that stereo-vision is functionally important to become a dressmaker, and (ii) plasticity, or the fact that training on demanding stereovision tasks improves stereo-acuity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03425-1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adrien Chopin
Dennis M. Levi
Daphné Bavelier
spellingShingle Adrien Chopin
Dennis M. Levi
Daphné Bavelier
Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision
Scientific Reports
author_facet Adrien Chopin
Dennis M. Levi
Daphné Bavelier
author_sort Adrien Chopin
title Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision
title_short Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision
title_full Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision
title_fullStr Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision
title_full_unstemmed Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision
title_sort dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract The ability to estimate the distance of objects from one’s self and from each other is fundamental to a variety of behaviours from grasping objects to navigating. The main cue to distance, stereopsis, relies on the slight offsets between the images derived from our left and right eyes, also termed disparities. Here we ask whether the precision of stereopsis varies with professional experience with precise manual tasks. We measured stereo-acuities of dressmakers and non-dressmakers for both absolute and relative disparities. We used a stereoscope and a computerized test removing monocular cues. We also measured vergence noise and bias using the Nonius line technique. We demonstrate that dressmakers’ stereoscopic acuities are better than those of non-dressmakers, for both absolute and relative disparities. In contrast, vergence noise and bias were comparable in the two groups. Two non-exclusive mechanisms may be at the source of the group difference we document: (i) self-selection or the fact that stereo-vision is functionally important to become a dressmaker, and (ii) plasticity, or the fact that training on demanding stereovision tasks improves stereo-acuity.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03425-1
work_keys_str_mv AT adrienchopin dressmakersshowenhancedstereoscopicvision
AT dennismlevi dressmakersshowenhancedstereoscopicvision
AT daphnebavelier dressmakersshowenhancedstereoscopicvision
_version_ 1724396202807525376