Comparative Analysis of Measurement after Recognition of Property, Plant and Equipment – IAS 16 vs. OMPF No. 1802/2014

Valuating property, plant and equipment after recognition with the purpose of preparing the annual financial statements is an extremely important step in presenting a true and fair view of the entity. Thus, the companies must take into account the main valuation methods used and develop appropriate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mărioara MOLOCINIUC (HRIȚCAN)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania 2021-04-01
Series:CECCAR Business Review
Subjects:
Online Access: https://www.ceccarbusinessreview.ro/comparative-analysis-of-measurement-after-recognition-of-property-plant-and-equipment-ias-16-vs-ompf-no-1802-2014-a115d/download-PDF/
id doaj-6762f3654d6949cb96392c1eb680bc2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6762f3654d6949cb96392c1eb680bc2c2021-04-28T11:59:27ZengThe Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania CECCAR Business Review2668-89212668-89212021-04-0123597210.37945/cbr.2021.03.0726688921Comparative Analysis of Measurement after Recognition of Property, Plant and Equipment – IAS 16 vs. OMPF No. 1802/2014Mărioara MOLOCINIUC (HRIȚCAN)0"Ștefan cel Mare" University of SuceavaValuating property, plant and equipment after recognition with the purpose of preparing the annual financial statements is an extremely important step in presenting a true and fair view of the entity. Thus, the companies must take into account the main valuation methods used and develop appropriate accounting policies and procedures to ensure that the users of financial and accounting information are properly informed and understand every change that occurs. The book value, respectively the carrying amount, of property, plant and equipment is represented abiding by the prudence concept, according to which every impairment or change from the determined value shall be taken into account. The efficiency with which these assets are valuated brings surplus value to the entity and has a direct impact on the financial statements.The main objective of this article is to present the methods of valuation used to valuate property, plant and equipment. This way, at the end of the research the main applicable accounting treatments and the differences between IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment and Order of the Minister of Public Finance No. 1802/2014 for the approval of the Accounting regulations regarding the individual annual financial statements and consolidated annual financial statements, as subsequently amended and supplemented, will be understood. https://www.ceccarbusinessreview.ro/comparative-analysis-of-measurement-after-recognition-of-property-plant-and-equipment-ias-16-vs-ompf-no-1802-2014-a115d/download-PDF/ impairmentvaluationpropertyplant and equipmentrevaluationnet carrying valuejust value
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mărioara MOLOCINIUC (HRIȚCAN)
spellingShingle Mărioara MOLOCINIUC (HRIȚCAN)
Comparative Analysis of Measurement after Recognition of Property, Plant and Equipment – IAS 16 vs. OMPF No. 1802/2014
CECCAR Business Review
impairment
valuation
property
plant and equipment
revaluation
net carrying value
just value
author_facet Mărioara MOLOCINIUC (HRIȚCAN)
author_sort Mărioara MOLOCINIUC (HRIȚCAN)
title Comparative Analysis of Measurement after Recognition of Property, Plant and Equipment – IAS 16 vs. OMPF No. 1802/2014
title_short Comparative Analysis of Measurement after Recognition of Property, Plant and Equipment – IAS 16 vs. OMPF No. 1802/2014
title_full Comparative Analysis of Measurement after Recognition of Property, Plant and Equipment – IAS 16 vs. OMPF No. 1802/2014
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Measurement after Recognition of Property, Plant and Equipment – IAS 16 vs. OMPF No. 1802/2014
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Measurement after Recognition of Property, Plant and Equipment – IAS 16 vs. OMPF No. 1802/2014
title_sort comparative analysis of measurement after recognition of property, plant and equipment – ias 16 vs. ompf no. 1802/2014
publisher The Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania
series CECCAR Business Review
issn 2668-8921
2668-8921
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Valuating property, plant and equipment after recognition with the purpose of preparing the annual financial statements is an extremely important step in presenting a true and fair view of the entity. Thus, the companies must take into account the main valuation methods used and develop appropriate accounting policies and procedures to ensure that the users of financial and accounting information are properly informed and understand every change that occurs. The book value, respectively the carrying amount, of property, plant and equipment is represented abiding by the prudence concept, according to which every impairment or change from the determined value shall be taken into account. The efficiency with which these assets are valuated brings surplus value to the entity and has a direct impact on the financial statements.The main objective of this article is to present the methods of valuation used to valuate property, plant and equipment. This way, at the end of the research the main applicable accounting treatments and the differences between IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment and Order of the Minister of Public Finance No. 1802/2014 for the approval of the Accounting regulations regarding the individual annual financial statements and consolidated annual financial statements, as subsequently amended and supplemented, will be understood.
topic impairment
valuation
property
plant and equipment
revaluation
net carrying value
just value
url https://www.ceccarbusinessreview.ro/comparative-analysis-of-measurement-after-recognition-of-property-plant-and-equipment-ias-16-vs-ompf-no-1802-2014-a115d/download-PDF/
work_keys_str_mv AT marioaramolociniuchritcan comparativeanalysisofmeasurementafterrecognitionofpropertyplantandequipmentias16vsompfno18022014
_version_ 1721503579084161024