The effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow pattern

In this paper some results concerning the evolution of 3D fluid flow pattern through all four strokes in combustion chambers with entirely different bowl-in-piston geometry layouts ranging from ”omega” to “simple cylinder” were presented. All combustion chambers i.e. those with „omega“ bowls, wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jovanovic Zoran S., Živanović Zlatomir M., Šakota Željko B., Tomić Miroljub V., Petrović Velimir S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences 2011-01-01
Series:Thermal Science
Subjects:
CFD
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-9836/2011/0354-98361100040J.pdf
id doaj-675118750fca4a1dba33fe8213a64480
record_format Article
spelling doaj-675118750fca4a1dba33fe8213a644802021-01-02T00:48:54ZengVINCA Institute of Nuclear SciencesThermal Science0354-98362011-01-0115381783210.2298/TSCI110417040JThe effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow patternJovanovic Zoran S.Živanović Zlatomir M.Šakota Željko B.Tomić Miroljub V.Petrović Velimir S.In this paper some results concerning the evolution of 3D fluid flow pattern through all four strokes in combustion chambers with entirely different bowl-in-piston geometry layouts ranging from ”omega” to “simple cylinder” were presented. All combustion chambers i.e. those with „omega“ bowls, with different profiles, and those with „cylinder“ bowls, with different squish area ranging from 44% to 62%, were with flat head, vertical valves and identical elevation of intake and exhaust ports. A bunch of results emerged by dint of multidimensional modeling of nonreactive fluid flow in arbitrary geometry with moving objects and boundaries. The fluid flow pattern during induction and compression in all cases was extremely complicated and entirely three-dimensional. It should be noted that significant differences due to geometry of the bowl were encountered only in the vicinity of TDC. Namely, in the case of “omega” bowl all three types of organized macro flows were observed while in the case of “cylinder” bowl no circumferential velocity was registered at all. On the contrary, in the case of “cylinder” bowl some interesting results concerning reverse tumble and its center of rotation shifting from exhaust valve zone to intake valve zone during induction stroke and vice-verse from intake valve zone to exhaust valve zone during compression were observed while in the case of “omega” bowl no such a displacement was legible. During expansion the fluid flow pattern is fully controlled by piston motion and during exhaust it is mainly one-dimensional, except in the close proximity of exhaust valve. For that reason it is not affected by the geometry of the bowl.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-9836/2011/0354-98361100040J.pdf3D modellingCFDfluid flowturbulence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jovanovic Zoran S.
Živanović Zlatomir M.
Šakota Željko B.
Tomić Miroljub V.
Petrović Velimir S.
spellingShingle Jovanovic Zoran S.
Živanović Zlatomir M.
Šakota Željko B.
Tomić Miroljub V.
Petrović Velimir S.
The effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow pattern
Thermal Science
3D modelling
CFD
fluid flow
turbulence
author_facet Jovanovic Zoran S.
Živanović Zlatomir M.
Šakota Željko B.
Tomić Miroljub V.
Petrović Velimir S.
author_sort Jovanovic Zoran S.
title The effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow pattern
title_short The effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow pattern
title_full The effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow pattern
title_fullStr The effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow pattern
title_full_unstemmed The effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow pattern
title_sort effect of bowl-in-piston geometry layout on fluid flow pattern
publisher VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences
series Thermal Science
issn 0354-9836
publishDate 2011-01-01
description In this paper some results concerning the evolution of 3D fluid flow pattern through all four strokes in combustion chambers with entirely different bowl-in-piston geometry layouts ranging from ”omega” to “simple cylinder” were presented. All combustion chambers i.e. those with „omega“ bowls, with different profiles, and those with „cylinder“ bowls, with different squish area ranging from 44% to 62%, were with flat head, vertical valves and identical elevation of intake and exhaust ports. A bunch of results emerged by dint of multidimensional modeling of nonreactive fluid flow in arbitrary geometry with moving objects and boundaries. The fluid flow pattern during induction and compression in all cases was extremely complicated and entirely three-dimensional. It should be noted that significant differences due to geometry of the bowl were encountered only in the vicinity of TDC. Namely, in the case of “omega” bowl all three types of organized macro flows were observed while in the case of “cylinder” bowl no circumferential velocity was registered at all. On the contrary, in the case of “cylinder” bowl some interesting results concerning reverse tumble and its center of rotation shifting from exhaust valve zone to intake valve zone during induction stroke and vice-verse from intake valve zone to exhaust valve zone during compression were observed while in the case of “omega” bowl no such a displacement was legible. During expansion the fluid flow pattern is fully controlled by piston motion and during exhaust it is mainly one-dimensional, except in the close proximity of exhaust valve. For that reason it is not affected by the geometry of the bowl.
topic 3D modelling
CFD
fluid flow
turbulence
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-9836/2011/0354-98361100040J.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jovanoviczorans theeffectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT zivanoviczlatomirm theeffectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT sakotazeljkob theeffectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT tomicmiroljubv theeffectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT petrovicvelimirs theeffectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT jovanoviczorans effectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT zivanoviczlatomirm effectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT sakotazeljkob effectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT tomicmiroljubv effectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
AT petrovicvelimirs effectofbowlinpistongeometrylayoutonfluidflowpattern
_version_ 1724363445014364160