Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.

The network architecture of an ecological community describes the structure of species interactions established in a given place and time. It has been suggested that this architecture presents unique features for each type of ecological interaction: e.g., nested and modular architectures would corre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chuliang Song, Serguei Saavedra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-04-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007787
id doaj-674eea717c5343669b13704017b9d192
record_format Article
spelling doaj-674eea717c5343669b13704017b9d1922021-04-21T15:15:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582020-04-01164e100778710.1371/journal.pcbi.1007787Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.Chuliang SongSerguei SaavedraThe network architecture of an ecological community describes the structure of species interactions established in a given place and time. It has been suggested that this architecture presents unique features for each type of ecological interaction: e.g., nested and modular architectures would correspond to mutualistic and antagonistic interactions, respectively. Recently, Michalska-Smith and Allesina (2019) proposed a computational challenge to test whether it is indeed possible to differentiate ecological interactions based on network architecture. Contrary to the expectation, they found that this differentiation is practically impossible, moving the question to why it is not possible to differentiate ecological interactions based on their network architecture alone. Here, we show that this differentiation becomes possible by adding the local environmental information where the networks were sampled. We show that this can be explained by the fact that environmental conditions are a confounder of ecological interactions and network architecture. That is, the lack of association between network architecture and type of ecological interactions changes by conditioning on the local environmental conditions. Additionally, we find that environmental conditions are linked to the stability of ecological networks, but the direction of this effect depends on the type of interaction network. This suggests that the association between ecological interactions and network architectures exists, but cannot be fully understood without attention to the environmental conditions acting upon them.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007787
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chuliang Song
Serguei Saavedra
spellingShingle Chuliang Song
Serguei Saavedra
Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Chuliang Song
Serguei Saavedra
author_sort Chuliang Song
title Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.
title_short Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.
title_full Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.
title_fullStr Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.
title_full_unstemmed Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.
title_sort telling ecological networks apart by their structure: an environment-dependent approach.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2020-04-01
description The network architecture of an ecological community describes the structure of species interactions established in a given place and time. It has been suggested that this architecture presents unique features for each type of ecological interaction: e.g., nested and modular architectures would correspond to mutualistic and antagonistic interactions, respectively. Recently, Michalska-Smith and Allesina (2019) proposed a computational challenge to test whether it is indeed possible to differentiate ecological interactions based on network architecture. Contrary to the expectation, they found that this differentiation is practically impossible, moving the question to why it is not possible to differentiate ecological interactions based on their network architecture alone. Here, we show that this differentiation becomes possible by adding the local environmental information where the networks were sampled. We show that this can be explained by the fact that environmental conditions are a confounder of ecological interactions and network architecture. That is, the lack of association between network architecture and type of ecological interactions changes by conditioning on the local environmental conditions. Additionally, we find that environmental conditions are linked to the stability of ecological networks, but the direction of this effect depends on the type of interaction network. This suggests that the association between ecological interactions and network architectures exists, but cannot be fully understood without attention to the environmental conditions acting upon them.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007787
work_keys_str_mv AT chuliangsong tellingecologicalnetworksapartbytheirstructureanenvironmentdependentapproach
AT sergueisaavedra tellingecologicalnetworksapartbytheirstructureanenvironmentdependentapproach
_version_ 1714667647479578624