Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak
In analyzing the distinction between flak and scandal, this investigation focuses on the discourse around Solyndra in 2011–2012 on two media platforms. Solyndra was a solar panel firm that went bankrupt after receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (‘The Stimulus’) funds. The analysis shows...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Media and Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3692 |
id |
doaj-674e7cbf3c654858a2b66a90885057dd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-674e7cbf3c654858a2b66a90885057dd2021-04-06T10:35:26ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392021-04-0192889710.17645/mac.v9i2.36921928Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as FlakBrian Michael Goss0Department of Communication, Saint Louis University—Madrid Campus, SpainIn analyzing the distinction between flak and scandal, this investigation focuses on the discourse around Solyndra in 2011–2012 on two media platforms. Solyndra was a solar panel firm that went bankrupt after receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (‘The Stimulus’) funds. The analysis shows that National Review—a rightwing journal of opinion that increasingly operates as an online platform—unswervingly utilized the Solyndra bankruptcy as an instrument of political combat. Following flak lines rehearsed by Republicans in congressional hearings, National Review narrated Solyndra as scandalous evidence of the Obama administration’s putative ineptitude and/or criminality that, moreover, discredited the efficacy of green energy. The performance of the mainstream newspaper The Washington Post presented a grab-bag mix as its objective methods insinuated flak packaged as scandal into stories when they followed Republican talking points. At the same time, The Washington Post’s discourse noted that no evidence of administration corruption was discovered despite extensive investigation and that government intervention into the economy is often highly beneficial.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3692democratsflaknational reviewpolitical scandalrepublicanssolyndrathe washington post |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brian Michael Goss |
spellingShingle |
Brian Michael Goss Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak Media and Communication democrats flak national review political scandal republicans solyndra the washington post |
author_facet |
Brian Michael Goss |
author_sort |
Brian Michael Goss |
title |
Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak |
title_short |
Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak |
title_full |
Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak |
title_fullStr |
Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak |
title_full_unstemmed |
Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak |
title_sort |
making watergate “look like child’s play”: the solyndra discourse (2011–2012) as flak |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Media and Communication |
issn |
2183-2439 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
In analyzing the distinction between flak and scandal, this investigation focuses on the discourse around Solyndra in 2011–2012 on two media platforms. Solyndra was a solar panel firm that went bankrupt after receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (‘The Stimulus’) funds. The analysis shows that National Review—a rightwing journal of opinion that increasingly operates as an online platform—unswervingly utilized the Solyndra bankruptcy as an instrument of political combat. Following flak lines rehearsed by Republicans in congressional hearings, National Review narrated Solyndra as scandalous evidence of the Obama administration’s putative ineptitude and/or criminality that, moreover, discredited the efficacy of green energy. The performance of the mainstream newspaper The Washington Post presented a grab-bag mix as its objective methods insinuated flak packaged as scandal into stories when they followed Republican talking points. At the same time, The Washington Post’s discourse noted that no evidence of administration corruption was discovered despite extensive investigation and that government intervention into the economy is often highly beneficial. |
topic |
democrats flak national review political scandal republicans solyndra the washington post |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3692 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brianmichaelgoss makingwatergatelooklikechildsplaythesolyndradiscourse20112012asflak |
_version_ |
1721538329234636800 |