Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014

A major issue in Swedish and international research has, indeed, been the overriding purpose of social studies, along with the recurring discussion on whether the teaching of social studies should be organised in the individual subjects or be subject-integrated. The main aim of this article is to an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johan Samuelsson
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Karlstads Universitet 2014-06-01
Series:Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33319
id doaj-674c8abd450342e388a8d3515545c70a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-674c8abd450342e388a8d3515545c70a2020-11-24T21:01:41ZdanKarlstads Universitet Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education2000-98792000-98792014-06-0120142014:185118Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014Johan SamuelssonA major issue in Swedish and international research has, indeed, been the overriding purpose of social studies, along with the recurring discussion on whether the teaching of social studies should be organised in the individual subjects or be subject-integrated. The main aim of this article is to analyse how social studies as a specific field of study is featured in government commissions of inquiry and steering documents in the period 1980-2014. The analysis is primarily based on American and Nordic history and social studies education theory, which has identified a number of concepts regarding the purpose and organization of the social studies subject; the humanistic approach; the progressively approach; the disciplinary oriented approach and the postmodern and interpretive approach. The article is based on an analysis of national evaluations and reviews of social studies as well as curricula and government commissioned inquiries. The analysis shows that social studies as a knowledge domain is characterized by progressivism in the national evaluations in the whole period. Although curricula nowadays have a disciplinary perspective on the purpose and organization of social studies, progressivism is still prevalent in evaluations. It is clear that the public authorities responsible for the most recent inspections embrace progressivism. Concurrent with the predominance of certain education philosophies–progressivism in 1980-2011 and the disciplinary perspective from 2011– there are also traces of other approaches in the curricula, for example, the humanistic as well as the postmodern perspectives. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33319 : SOCIAL STUDIESHISTORYCURRICULUM DEBATE
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johan Samuelsson
spellingShingle Johan Samuelsson
Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014
Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education
: SOCIAL STUDIES
HISTORY
CURRICULUM DEBATE
author_facet Johan Samuelsson
author_sort Johan Samuelsson
title Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014
title_short Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014
title_full Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014
title_fullStr Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014
title_full_unstemmed Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014
title_sort ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: so-undervisning i sverige 1980-2014
publisher Karlstads Universitet
series Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education
issn 2000-9879
2000-9879
publishDate 2014-06-01
description A major issue in Swedish and international research has, indeed, been the overriding purpose of social studies, along with the recurring discussion on whether the teaching of social studies should be organised in the individual subjects or be subject-integrated. The main aim of this article is to analyse how social studies as a specific field of study is featured in government commissions of inquiry and steering documents in the period 1980-2014. The analysis is primarily based on American and Nordic history and social studies education theory, which has identified a number of concepts regarding the purpose and organization of the social studies subject; the humanistic approach; the progressively approach; the disciplinary oriented approach and the postmodern and interpretive approach. The article is based on an analysis of national evaluations and reviews of social studies as well as curricula and government commissioned inquiries. The analysis shows that social studies as a knowledge domain is characterized by progressivism in the national evaluations in the whole period. Although curricula nowadays have a disciplinary perspective on the purpose and organization of social studies, progressivism is still prevalent in evaluations. It is clear that the public authorities responsible for the most recent inspections embrace progressivism. Concurrent with the predominance of certain education philosophies–progressivism in 1980-2011 and the disciplinary perspective from 2011– there are also traces of other approaches in the curricula, for example, the humanistic as well as the postmodern perspectives.
topic : SOCIAL STUDIES
HISTORY
CURRICULUM DEBATE
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33319
work_keys_str_mv AT johansamuelsson amnesintegreringochamnesspecialiseringsoundervisningisverige19802014
_version_ 1716777218921725952