Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence

<p>Abstract</p> <p>This paper reports on income generation practices among civil servants in the health sector, with a particular emphasis on dual practice. It first approaches the subject of public–private overlap. Thereafter it focuses on coping strategies in general and then on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hipólito Fátima, Fronteira Inês, Van Lerberghe Wim, Ferrinho Paulo, Biscaia André
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-10-01
Series:Human Resources for Health
Online Access:http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/2/1/14
id doaj-6748e3aba4994bd6bbd1bdae48e8fc27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6748e3aba4994bd6bbd1bdae48e8fc272020-11-25T01:14:55ZengBMCHuman Resources for Health1478-44912004-10-01211410.1186/1478-4491-2-14Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidenceHipólito FátimaFronteira InêsVan Lerberghe WimFerrinho PauloBiscaia André<p>Abstract</p> <p>This paper reports on income generation practices among civil servants in the health sector, with a particular emphasis on dual practice. It first approaches the subject of public–private overlap. Thereafter it focuses on coping strategies in general and then on dual practice in particular.</p> <p>To compensate for unrealistically low salaries, health workers rely on individual coping strategies. Many clinicians combine salaried, public-sector clinical work with a fee-for-service private clientele. This dual practice is often a means by which health workers try to meet their survival needs, reflecting the inability of health ministries to ensure adequate salaries and working conditions.</p> <p>Dual practice may be considered present in most countries, if not all. Nevertheless, there is surprisingly little hard evidence about the extent to which health workers resort to dual practice, about the balance of economic and other motives for doing so, or about the consequences for the proper use of the scarce public resources dedicated to health.</p> <p>In this paper dual practice is approached from six different perspectives: (1) conceptual, regarding what is meant by dual practice; (2) descriptive, trying to develop a typology of dual practices; (3) quantitative, trying to determine its prevalence; (4) impact on personal income, the health care system and health status; (5) qualitative, looking at the reasons why practitioners so frequently remain in public practice while also working in the private sector and at contextual, personal life, institutional and professional factors that make it easier or more difficult to have dual practices; and (6) possible interventions to deal with dual practice.</p> http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/2/1/14
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hipólito Fátima
Fronteira Inês
Van Lerberghe Wim
Ferrinho Paulo
Biscaia André
spellingShingle Hipólito Fátima
Fronteira Inês
Van Lerberghe Wim
Ferrinho Paulo
Biscaia André
Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence
Human Resources for Health
author_facet Hipólito Fátima
Fronteira Inês
Van Lerberghe Wim
Ferrinho Paulo
Biscaia André
author_sort Hipólito Fátima
title Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence
title_short Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence
title_full Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence
title_fullStr Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence
title_sort dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence
publisher BMC
series Human Resources for Health
issn 1478-4491
publishDate 2004-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>This paper reports on income generation practices among civil servants in the health sector, with a particular emphasis on dual practice. It first approaches the subject of public–private overlap. Thereafter it focuses on coping strategies in general and then on dual practice in particular.</p> <p>To compensate for unrealistically low salaries, health workers rely on individual coping strategies. Many clinicians combine salaried, public-sector clinical work with a fee-for-service private clientele. This dual practice is often a means by which health workers try to meet their survival needs, reflecting the inability of health ministries to ensure adequate salaries and working conditions.</p> <p>Dual practice may be considered present in most countries, if not all. Nevertheless, there is surprisingly little hard evidence about the extent to which health workers resort to dual practice, about the balance of economic and other motives for doing so, or about the consequences for the proper use of the scarce public resources dedicated to health.</p> <p>In this paper dual practice is approached from six different perspectives: (1) conceptual, regarding what is meant by dual practice; (2) descriptive, trying to develop a typology of dual practices; (3) quantitative, trying to determine its prevalence; (4) impact on personal income, the health care system and health status; (5) qualitative, looking at the reasons why practitioners so frequently remain in public practice while also working in the private sector and at contextual, personal life, institutional and professional factors that make it easier or more difficult to have dual practices; and (6) possible interventions to deal with dual practice.</p>
url http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/2/1/14
work_keys_str_mv AT hipolitofatima dualpracticeinthehealthsectorreviewoftheevidence
AT fronteiraines dualpracticeinthehealthsectorreviewoftheevidence
AT vanlerberghewim dualpracticeinthehealthsectorreviewoftheevidence
AT ferrinhopaulo dualpracticeinthehealthsectorreviewoftheevidence
AT biscaiaandre dualpracticeinthehealthsectorreviewoftheevidence
_version_ 1725155609875054592