Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and Thailand

Radicalism has become a serious problem for many countries, including in Southeast Asia. One of its triggering factors is an extreme understanding of religion that leads to the assumption that people with different understandings are wrong and that violence is a legitimate way to change the situatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bayu Mitra A. Kusuma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 2017-07-01
Series:IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/27467
id doaj-6748ab2eb29b49dab9086a77ec7c79ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6748ab2eb29b49dab9086a77ec7c79ec2020-11-25T03:22:50ZengUniversitas Gadjah Mada, YogyakartaIKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies2580-65802017-07-0111334610.22146/ikat.v1i1.2746717474Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and ThailandBayu Mitra A. Kusuma0Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic UniversityRadicalism has become a serious problem for many countries, including in Southeast Asia. One of its triggering factors is an extreme understanding of religion that leads to the assumption that people with different understandings are wrong and that violence is a legitimate way to change the situation. This often occurs because of a love of lineage or clan, as well as aggressive instincts. Such an extreme understanding results in the religious social conflicts, which in reality—particularly those involving Islam in Southeast Asia—are often influenced by regimes’ asymmetric policies. This study, therefore, explores the role of the State as a root of radicalism in the context of the dynamic relationship between Islam and asymmetric policies, with a focus on the southern Philippines and Thailand. Research findings show that the rise of radicalism in the Philippines was caused by social conflict resulting from government manipulation of referendum policy on special autonomy in predominant Muslim areas. Meanwhile, radicalism in Thailand was triggered by social conflict resulting from the cultural assimilation policy imposed upon the Muslim community by the government.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/27467islam, radicalism, asymmetric policy, social conflict
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bayu Mitra A. Kusuma
spellingShingle Bayu Mitra A. Kusuma
Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and Thailand
IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
islam, radicalism, asymmetric policy, social conflict
author_facet Bayu Mitra A. Kusuma
author_sort Bayu Mitra A. Kusuma
title Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and Thailand
title_short Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and Thailand
title_full Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and Thailand
title_fullStr Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and Thailand
title_sort islam, asymmetric policy, and social conflict: the state's role as a root of radicalism in the philippines and thailand
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
series IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
issn 2580-6580
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Radicalism has become a serious problem for many countries, including in Southeast Asia. One of its triggering factors is an extreme understanding of religion that leads to the assumption that people with different understandings are wrong and that violence is a legitimate way to change the situation. This often occurs because of a love of lineage or clan, as well as aggressive instincts. Such an extreme understanding results in the religious social conflicts, which in reality—particularly those involving Islam in Southeast Asia—are often influenced by regimes’ asymmetric policies. This study, therefore, explores the role of the State as a root of radicalism in the context of the dynamic relationship between Islam and asymmetric policies, with a focus on the southern Philippines and Thailand. Research findings show that the rise of radicalism in the Philippines was caused by social conflict resulting from government manipulation of referendum policy on special autonomy in predominant Muslim areas. Meanwhile, radicalism in Thailand was triggered by social conflict resulting from the cultural assimilation policy imposed upon the Muslim community by the government.
topic islam, radicalism, asymmetric policy, social conflict
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/27467
work_keys_str_mv AT bayumitraakusuma islamasymmetricpolicyandsocialconflictthestatesroleasarootofradicalisminthephilippinesandthailand
_version_ 1724609247916851200