Fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber posts

Aim: This study evaluated the fracture load and pattern failure of different prefabricated glass fiber posts (GFPs) of the same diameter. Methods: Seventy-eight (n=13 for six groups) GFPs of 1.6 mm coronal diameter of different brands were evaluated— Exacto (Angelus), Power Post (BM4), White Post D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helder Callegaro Velho, Paolo Baldissara, Jovito Adiel Skupien, Vinicius Felipe Wandscher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2019-11-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657253
id doaj-6740a0adfcd243d5b83dd9458bf560a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6740a0adfcd243d5b83dd9458bf560a92021-07-14T18:45:59ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252019-11-011810.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657253Fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber postsHelder Callegaro Velho0Paolo Baldissara1Jovito Adiel Skupien2Vinicius Felipe Wandscher3Franciscan UniversityUniversity of BolognaFranciscan UniversityFranciscan University Aim: This study evaluated the fracture load and pattern failure of different prefabricated glass fiber posts (GFPs) of the same diameter. Methods: Seventy-eight (n=13 for six groups) GFPs of 1.6 mm coronal diameter of different brands were evaluated— Exacto (Angelus), Power Post (BM4), White Post DC (FGM), HiRem (Overfibers), MAQ (Maquira), and SD (Supordont). The posts were subjected to fracture load testing (45° of inclination and 1 mm/min until fracture). Each factor (load (N) and shear stress (MPa)) was analyzed separately using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=0.05). Results: The type of failure was evaluated on a stereomicroscope (×10). The Power Post samples presented higher values of fracture load (p<0.001) followed by Maquira fiber post, White Post , HiRem, Superpost, and the Exacto posts. The failure pattern observed was intralaminar mode II in-plane shear, such as a failure occur parallel to fibers. Conclusion: Despite the same diameter of GFPs, the fracture load and shear resistance were brand-dependent. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657253GlassMaterials testingStress, mechanicalFlexural strength.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helder Callegaro Velho
Paolo Baldissara
Jovito Adiel Skupien
Vinicius Felipe Wandscher
spellingShingle Helder Callegaro Velho
Paolo Baldissara
Jovito Adiel Skupien
Vinicius Felipe Wandscher
Fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber posts
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Glass
Materials testing
Stress, mechanical
Flexural strength.
author_facet Helder Callegaro Velho
Paolo Baldissara
Jovito Adiel Skupien
Vinicius Felipe Wandscher
author_sort Helder Callegaro Velho
title Fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber posts
title_short Fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber posts
title_full Fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber posts
title_fullStr Fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber posts
title_full_unstemmed Fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber posts
title_sort fracture load and shear stress of prefabricated glass fiber posts
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
issn 1677-3225
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Aim: This study evaluated the fracture load and pattern failure of different prefabricated glass fiber posts (GFPs) of the same diameter. Methods: Seventy-eight (n=13 for six groups) GFPs of 1.6 mm coronal diameter of different brands were evaluated— Exacto (Angelus), Power Post (BM4), White Post DC (FGM), HiRem (Overfibers), MAQ (Maquira), and SD (Supordont). The posts were subjected to fracture load testing (45° of inclination and 1 mm/min until fracture). Each factor (load (N) and shear stress (MPa)) was analyzed separately using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=0.05). Results: The type of failure was evaluated on a stereomicroscope (×10). The Power Post samples presented higher values of fracture load (p<0.001) followed by Maquira fiber post, White Post , HiRem, Superpost, and the Exacto posts. The failure pattern observed was intralaminar mode II in-plane shear, such as a failure occur parallel to fibers. Conclusion: Despite the same diameter of GFPs, the fracture load and shear resistance were brand-dependent.
topic Glass
Materials testing
Stress, mechanical
Flexural strength.
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657253
work_keys_str_mv AT heldercallegarovelho fractureloadandshearstressofprefabricatedglassfiberposts
AT paolobaldissara fractureloadandshearstressofprefabricatedglassfiberposts
AT jovitoadielskupien fractureloadandshearstressofprefabricatedglassfiberposts
AT viniciusfelipewandscher fractureloadandshearstressofprefabricatedglassfiberposts
_version_ 1721302473662005248