Behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: Disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive control

Abstract Background Behavioral inhibition (BI) is a temperament style characterized by heightened reactivity and negative affect in response to novel people and situations, and it predicts anxiety problems later in life. However, not all BI children develop anxiety problems, and mounting evidence su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emilio A. Valadez, Sonya V. Troller‐Renfree, George A. Buzzell, Heather A. Henderson, Andrea Chronis‐Tuscano, Daniel S. Pine, Nathan A. Fox
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-07-01
Series:JCPP Advances
Subjects:
EEG
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12022
id doaj-6732c0926cf84c4a8a0d6accaf57dc03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6732c0926cf84c4a8a0d6accaf57dc032021-08-05T14:44:27ZengWileyJCPP Advances2692-93842021-07-0112n/an/a10.1002/jcv2.12022Behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: Disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive controlEmilio A. Valadez0Sonya V. Troller‐Renfree1George A. Buzzell2Heather A. Henderson3Andrea Chronis‐Tuscano4Daniel S. Pine5Nathan A. Fox6Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology University of Maryland College Park Maryland USADepartment of Biobehavioral Sciences Teachers College Columbia University New York New York USADepartment of Psychology Florida International University Miami Florida USADepartment of Psychology University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario CanadaDepartment of Psychology University of Maryland College Park Maryland USAEmotion and Development Branch National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program National Institute of Mental Health Bethesda Maryland USADepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology University of Maryland College Park Maryland USAAbstract Background Behavioral inhibition (BI) is a temperament style characterized by heightened reactivity and negative affect in response to novel people and situations, and it predicts anxiety problems later in life. However, not all BI children develop anxiety problems, and mounting evidence suggests that how one manages their cognitive resources (cognitive control) influences anxiety risk. The present study tests whether more (proactive control) or less (reactive control) planful cognitive strategies moderate relations between early BI and later anxiety. Methods Participants included 112 adolescents (55% female; Mage = 15.4 years) whose temperament was assessed during toddlerhood. In adolescence, participants completed an AX Continuous Performance Test while electroencephalography was recorded to disentangle neural activity related to proactive (cue‐locked P3b) and reactive (probe‐locked N2) control. Results Greater BI was associated with greater total anxiety scores only among adolescents with smaller ΔP3bs and larger ΔN2s—a pattern consistent with decreased reliance on proactive strategies and increased reliance on reactive strategies. Additionally, a larger ΔP3b was associated with greater total anxiety scores; however, this effect was largely explained by the fact that females tended to have larger ΔP3bs and greater anxiety than males. Conclusions Early BI relates to risk for later anxiety specifically among adolescents who rely less on proactive strategies and more on reactive control strategies. Thus, cognitive control strategy moderates the association between developmental context (i.e., temperament) and later anxiety. The present study is the first to characterize how proactive and reactive control uniquely relate to pathways toward anxiety risk.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12022adolescenceanxietybehavioral inhibitioncognitive controlEEG
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emilio A. Valadez
Sonya V. Troller‐Renfree
George A. Buzzell
Heather A. Henderson
Andrea Chronis‐Tuscano
Daniel S. Pine
Nathan A. Fox
spellingShingle Emilio A. Valadez
Sonya V. Troller‐Renfree
George A. Buzzell
Heather A. Henderson
Andrea Chronis‐Tuscano
Daniel S. Pine
Nathan A. Fox
Behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: Disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive control
JCPP Advances
adolescence
anxiety
behavioral inhibition
cognitive control
EEG
author_facet Emilio A. Valadez
Sonya V. Troller‐Renfree
George A. Buzzell
Heather A. Henderson
Andrea Chronis‐Tuscano
Daniel S. Pine
Nathan A. Fox
author_sort Emilio A. Valadez
title Behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: Disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive control
title_short Behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: Disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive control
title_full Behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: Disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive control
title_fullStr Behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: Disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive control
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: Disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive control
title_sort behavioral inhibition and dual mechanisms of anxiety risk: disentangling neural correlates of proactive and reactive control
publisher Wiley
series JCPP Advances
issn 2692-9384
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background Behavioral inhibition (BI) is a temperament style characterized by heightened reactivity and negative affect in response to novel people and situations, and it predicts anxiety problems later in life. However, not all BI children develop anxiety problems, and mounting evidence suggests that how one manages their cognitive resources (cognitive control) influences anxiety risk. The present study tests whether more (proactive control) or less (reactive control) planful cognitive strategies moderate relations between early BI and later anxiety. Methods Participants included 112 adolescents (55% female; Mage = 15.4 years) whose temperament was assessed during toddlerhood. In adolescence, participants completed an AX Continuous Performance Test while electroencephalography was recorded to disentangle neural activity related to proactive (cue‐locked P3b) and reactive (probe‐locked N2) control. Results Greater BI was associated with greater total anxiety scores only among adolescents with smaller ΔP3bs and larger ΔN2s—a pattern consistent with decreased reliance on proactive strategies and increased reliance on reactive strategies. Additionally, a larger ΔP3b was associated with greater total anxiety scores; however, this effect was largely explained by the fact that females tended to have larger ΔP3bs and greater anxiety than males. Conclusions Early BI relates to risk for later anxiety specifically among adolescents who rely less on proactive strategies and more on reactive control strategies. Thus, cognitive control strategy moderates the association between developmental context (i.e., temperament) and later anxiety. The present study is the first to characterize how proactive and reactive control uniquely relate to pathways toward anxiety risk.
topic adolescence
anxiety
behavioral inhibition
cognitive control
EEG
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12022
work_keys_str_mv AT emilioavaladez behavioralinhibitionanddualmechanismsofanxietyriskdisentanglingneuralcorrelatesofproactiveandreactivecontrol
AT sonyavtrollerrenfree behavioralinhibitionanddualmechanismsofanxietyriskdisentanglingneuralcorrelatesofproactiveandreactivecontrol
AT georgeabuzzell behavioralinhibitionanddualmechanismsofanxietyriskdisentanglingneuralcorrelatesofproactiveandreactivecontrol
AT heatherahenderson behavioralinhibitionanddualmechanismsofanxietyriskdisentanglingneuralcorrelatesofproactiveandreactivecontrol
AT andreachronistuscano behavioralinhibitionanddualmechanismsofanxietyriskdisentanglingneuralcorrelatesofproactiveandreactivecontrol
AT danielspine behavioralinhibitionanddualmechanismsofanxietyriskdisentanglingneuralcorrelatesofproactiveandreactivecontrol
AT nathanafox behavioralinhibitionanddualmechanismsofanxietyriskdisentanglingneuralcorrelatesofproactiveandreactivecontrol
_version_ 1721220291179315200