Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential Method

This paper analyses the possibilities of improving the precision of, and obtaining better, drainage density (Dd) input data for the Erosion Potential Method (EPM). This method is used for erosion assessments in karst areas that are characterised by torrential watercourses. The analysis is conducted...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nevena Dragičević, Barbara Karleuša, Nevenka Ožanić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/593
id doaj-6723230a289548d195de813c1840de5e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6723230a289548d195de813c1840de5e2020-11-24T21:21:35ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412019-03-0111359310.3390/w11030593w11030593Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential MethodNevena Dragičević0Barbara Karleuša1Nevenka Ožanić2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Radmile Matejčić 3, 51 000 Rijeka, CroatiaUniversity of Rijeka, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Radmile Matejčić 3, 51 000 Rijeka, CroatiaUniversity of Rijeka, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Radmile Matejčić 3, 51 000 Rijeka, CroatiaThis paper analyses the possibilities of improving the precision of, and obtaining better, drainage density (Dd) input data for the Erosion Potential Method (EPM). This method is used for erosion assessments in karst areas that are characterised by torrential watercourses. The analysis is conducted in the Dubračina catchment in Croatia. Four different methodologies are used to derive a Dd map. The approaches use different assumptions and allow different spatial variability. The first two are commonly applied in the EPM. The Dd in the first case scenario corresponds to very low Dd and is homogenous throughout the entire catchment. In the second case, Dd is calculated on the sub-catchment level and varies from very low to medium. The third and fourth case scenarios provide the most spatially variant maps. The output of the third case is the actual Dd based on a topographic map, and the fourth potential Dd is based on a river network map derived from a Lidar digital elevation model. The third and fourth case scenarios provide better spatial variability for the Dd parameter, and both case scenarios are considered appropriate input data for the EPM and an improvement of the accuracy and precision of the EPM.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/593Erosion Potential Methoddrainage densityspatial variancesoil erosiondigital elevation modelriver network
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nevena Dragičević
Barbara Karleuša
Nevenka Ožanić
spellingShingle Nevena Dragičević
Barbara Karleuša
Nevenka Ožanić
Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential Method
Water
Erosion Potential Method
drainage density
spatial variance
soil erosion
digital elevation model
river network
author_facet Nevena Dragičević
Barbara Karleuša
Nevenka Ožanić
author_sort Nevena Dragičević
title Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential Method
title_short Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential Method
title_full Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential Method
title_fullStr Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential Method
title_full_unstemmed Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential Method
title_sort different approaches to estimation of drainage density and their effect on the erosion potential method
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2019-03-01
description This paper analyses the possibilities of improving the precision of, and obtaining better, drainage density (Dd) input data for the Erosion Potential Method (EPM). This method is used for erosion assessments in karst areas that are characterised by torrential watercourses. The analysis is conducted in the Dubračina catchment in Croatia. Four different methodologies are used to derive a Dd map. The approaches use different assumptions and allow different spatial variability. The first two are commonly applied in the EPM. The Dd in the first case scenario corresponds to very low Dd and is homogenous throughout the entire catchment. In the second case, Dd is calculated on the sub-catchment level and varies from very low to medium. The third and fourth case scenarios provide the most spatially variant maps. The output of the third case is the actual Dd based on a topographic map, and the fourth potential Dd is based on a river network map derived from a Lidar digital elevation model. The third and fourth case scenarios provide better spatial variability for the Dd parameter, and both case scenarios are considered appropriate input data for the EPM and an improvement of the accuracy and precision of the EPM.
topic Erosion Potential Method
drainage density
spatial variance
soil erosion
digital elevation model
river network
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/593
work_keys_str_mv AT nevenadragicevic differentapproachestoestimationofdrainagedensityandtheireffectontheerosionpotentialmethod
AT barbarakarleusa differentapproachestoestimationofdrainagedensityandtheireffectontheerosionpotentialmethod
AT nevenkaozanic differentapproachestoestimationofdrainagedensityandtheireffectontheerosionpotentialmethod
_version_ 1725999180251398144